Cited by 166Economic and Financial Impacts of CancerCancer survivorship and careNursing Roles and Practices

Resource Use and Medicare Costs During Lay Navigation for Geriatric Patients With Cancer

Open access
Rocque, Gabrielle B., Pisu, Maria, Jackson, Bradford E., Kvale, Elizabeth A., Demark-Wahnefried, Wendy, Martin, Michelle Y., Meneses, Karen, Li, Yufeng +8 more·2017·JAMA Oncology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Lay navigators in the Patient Care Connect Program support patients with cancer from diagnosis through survivorship to end of life. They empower patients to engage in their health care and navigate them through the increasingly complex health care system. Navigation programs can improve access to care, enhance coordination of care, and overcome barriers to timely, high-quality health care. However, few data exist regarding the financial implications of implementing a lay navigation program. OBJECTIVE: To examine the influence of lay navigation on health care spending and resource use among geriatric patients with cancer within The University of Alabama at Birmingham Health System Cancer Community Network. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This observational study from January 1, 2012, through December 31, 2015, used propensity score-matched regression analysis to compare quarterly changes in the mean total Medicare costs and resource use between navigated patients and nonnavigated, matched comparison patients. The setting was The University of Alabama at Birmingham Health System Cancer Community Network, which includes 2 academic and 10 community cancer centers across Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Mississippi, and Tennessee. Participants were Medicare beneficiaries with cancer who received care at participating institutions from 2012 through 2015. EXPOSURES: The primary exposure was contact with a patient navigator. Navigated patients were matched to nonnavigated patients on age, race, sex, cancer acuity (high vs low), comorbidity score, and preenrollment characteristics (costs, emergency department visits, hospitalizations, intensive care unit admissions, and chemotherapy in the preenrollment quarter). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Total costs to Medicare, components of cost, and resource use (emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit admissions). RESULTS: In total, 12 428 patients (mean (SD) age at cancer diagnosis, 75 (7) years; 52.0% female) were propensity score matched, including 6214 patients in the navigated group and 6214 patients in the matched nonnavigated comparison group. Compared with the matched comparison group, the mean total costs declined by $781.29 more per quarter per navigated patient (β = -781.29, SE = 45.77, P < .001), for an estimated $19 million decline per year across the network. Inpatient and outpatient costs had the largest between-group quarterly declines, at $294 and $275, respectively, per patient. Emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and intensive care unit admissions decreased by 6.0%, 7.9%, and 10.6%, respectively, per quarter in navigated patients compared with matched comparison patients (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Costs to Medicare and health care use from 2012 through 2015 declined significantly for navigated patients compared with matched comparison patients. Lay navigation programs should be expanded as health systems transition to value-based health care.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.6307

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Harvey R, Drzayich Jankus D, Mosley D; UnitedHealthcare. Random assignment of proxy event dates to unexposed individuals in observational studies: an automated technique using SAS. http://www.mwsug.org/proceedings /2012/PH/MWSUG-2012-PH02.pdf. Published 2012. Accessed August 4, 2016.
  2. Rocque GB, Partridge EE, Pisu M, et al. The Patient Care Connect Program: transforming health care through lay navigation. J Oncol Pract. 2016;12 (6):e633-e642. doi:10.1200/JOP.2015.008896 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rocque, G. B., Pisu, M., Jackson, B. E., Kvale, E. A., Demark-Wahnefried, W., Martin, M. Y., Meneses, K., Li, Y., Taylor, R. A., Acemgil, A., Williams, C. P., Lisovicz, N., Fouad, M., Kenzik, K. M., Partridge, E. E., & for the Patient Care Connect Group
Affiliations
  • University of Alabama at Birmingham (US)
  • Department of Nutrition Science, The University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US)
Corresponding author
Rocque, Gabrielle B.
Venue
JAMA Oncology
Published
2017-06-01
Volume
3
Issue
6
Pages
817
ISSN
2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2580419378
Cited by
166
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 29 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 11
FWCI
37.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (K12HS023009)
  • National Cancer Institute (P30CA013148)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Economic and Financial Impacts of Cancer
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Nursing Roles and Practices
Keywords
elderly cancer patients, Medicare spending, health care utilization, cost reduction, emergency department visits, hospitalization, intensive care unit admission, cancer survivorship, health care access, care coordination, community cancer centers, academic medical centers, racial disparities, socioeconomic disparities
MeSH terms
Aged, Alabama, Costs and Cost Analysis, Critical Care, Emergency Service, Hospital, Health Expenditures, Female, Medicare, Health Resources, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Neoplasms, Regression Analysis, Salaries and Fringe Benefits, United States, Patient Navigation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review