The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Associations of Luminal and Basal Subtyping of Prostate Cancer With Prognosis and Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy
Open accessAbstract
Importance: There is a clear need for a molecular subtyping approach in prostate cancer to identify clinically distinct subgroups that benefit from specific therapies. Objectives: To identify prostate cancer subtypes based on luminal and basal lineage and to determine associations with clinical outcomes and response to treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: The PAM50 classifier was used to subtype 1567 retrospectively collected (median follow-up, 10 years) and 2215 prospectively collected prostate cancer samples into luminal- and basal-like subtypes. Main Outcomes and Measures: Metastasis, biochemical recurrence, overall survival, prostate cancer–specific survival, associations with biological pathways, and clinicopathologic variables were the main outcomes. Results: Among the 3782 samples, the PAM50 classifier consistently segregated prostate cancer into 3 subtypes in both the retrospective and prospective cohorts: luminal A (retrospective, 538 [34.3%]; prospective, 737 [33.3%]), luminal B (retrospective, 447 [28.5%]; prospective, 723 [32.6%]), and basal (retrospective, 582 [37.1%]; prospective, 755 [34.1%]). Known luminal lineage markers, such as NKX3.1 and KRT18, were enriched in luminal-like cancers, and the basal lineage CD49f signature was enriched in basal-like cancers, demonstrating the connection between these subtypes and established prostate cancer biology. In the retrospective cohort, luminal B prostate cancers exhibited the poorest clinical prognoses on both univariable and multivariable analyses accounting for standard clinicopathologic prognostic factors (10-year biochemical recurrence-free survival [bRFS], 29%; distant metastasis-free survival [DMFS], 53%; prostate cancer-specific survival [PCSS], 78%; overall survival [OS], 69%), followed by basal prostate cancers (10-year bRFS, 39%; DMFS, 73%; PCSS, 86%; OS, 80%) and luminal A prostate cancers (10-year bRFS, 41%; DMFS, 73%; PCSS, 89%; OS, 82%). Although both luminal-like subtypes were associated with increased androgen receptor expression and signaling, only luminal B prostate cancers were significantly associated with postoperative response to androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) in a subset analysis in our retrospective cohorts (n = 315) matching patients based on clinicopathologic variables (luminal B 10-year metastasis: treated, 33% vs untreated, 55%; nonluminal B 10-year metastasis: treated, 37% vs untreated, 21%; P = .006 for interaction). Conclusions and Relevance: Luminal- and basal-like prostate cancers demonstrate divergent clinical behavior, and patients with luminal B tumors respond better to postoperative ADT than do patients with non–luminal B tumors. These findings contribute novel insight into prostate cancer biology, providing a potential clinical tool to personalize ADT treatment for prostate cancer by predicting which men may benefit from ADT after surgery.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Subramanian, A., Tamayo, P., Mootha, V. K., Mukherjee, S., Ebert, B. L., Gillette, M. A., Paulovich, A., Pomeroy, S. L., Golub, T. R., Lander, E. S., et al. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0506580102 · Cited by 53,625
PD-1 and PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade to Treat Breast Cancer
Hartkopf, A. D., Taran, F.-A., Wallwiener, M., Walter, C. B., Krämer, B., Grischke, E.-M., & Brucker, S. Y. (2016) · Breast Care · doi:10.1159/000453569 · Cited by 30,845
Molecular portraits of human breast tumours
Perou, C. M., Sørlie, T., Eisen, M. B., van de Rijn, M., Jeffrey, S. S., Rees, C. A., Pollack, J. R., Ross, D. T., Johnsen, H., Akslen, L. A., et al. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35021093 · Cited by 16,261
Nishimura, R., Osako, T., Nishiyama, Y., Tashima, R., Nakano, M., Fujisue, M., Toyozumi, Y., & Arima, N. (2013) · Oncology · doi:10.1159/000353099 · Cited by 13,166
Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11412 · Cited by 12,129
Supervised Risk Predictor of Breast Cancer Based on Intrinsic Subtypes
Parker, J. S., Mullins, M., Cheang, M. C. U., Leung, S., Voduc, D., Vickery, T., Davies, S., Fauron, C., He, X., Hu, Z., et al. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2008.18.1370 · Cited by 4,721
D'Amico, A. V. (1998) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.280.11.969 · Cited by 4,523
Elkablawy, M. A., Albasri, A. M., Mohammed, R. A., Hussainy, A. S., Nouh, M. M., & Alhujaily, A. S. (2016) · Saudi Medical Journal · doi:10.15537/smj.2016.2.12285 · Cited by 4,382
Choi, W., Porten, S., Kim, S., Willis, D., Plimack, E. R., Hoffman-Censits, J., Roth, B., Cheng, T., Tran, M., Lee, I.-L., et al. (2014) · Cancer Cell · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2014.01.009 · Cited by 1,716
Pilepich, M. V., Winter, K., Lawton, C. A., Krisch, R. E., Wolkov, H. B., Movsas, B., Hug, E. B., Asbell, S. O., & Grignon, D. (2005) · International Journal of Radiation Oncology*Biology*Physics · doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.08.047 · Cited by 913
Cited by
Widespread and Functional RNA Circularization in Localized Prostate Cancer
Chen, S., Huang, V., Xu, X., Livingstone, J., Soares, F., Jeon, J., Zeng, Y., Hua, J. T., Petricca, J., Guo, H., et al. (2019) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2019.01.025 · Cited by 544
Self-citationIntegrative epigenetic taxonomy of primary prostate cancer
Stelloo, S., Nevedomskaya, E., Kim, Y., Schuurman, K., Valle-Encinas, E., Lobo, J., Krijgsman, O., Peeper, D. S., Chang, S. L., Feng, F. Y.-C., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07270-2 · Cited by 154
Self-citationPredictability of human differential gene expression
Crow, M., Lim, N., Ballouz, S., Pavlidis, P., & Gillis, J. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1802973116 · Cited by 117
The Proteome of Prostate Cancer Bone Metastasis Reveals Heterogeneity with Prognostic Implications
Iglesias-Gato, D., Thysell, E., Tyanova, S., Crnalic, S., Santos, A., Lima, T. S., Geiger, T., Cox, J., Widmark, A., Bergh, A., et al. (2018) · Clinical Cancer Research · doi:10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-18-1229 · Cited by 106
Mouillet-Richard, S., Martin-Lannerée, S., Le Corre, D., Hirsch, T. Z., Ghazi, A., Sroussi, M., Pilati, C., de Reyniès, A., Djouadi, F., Vodovar, N., et al. (2022) · Oncogene · doi:10.1038/s41388-022-02430-7 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, S. G., Chang, S. L., Erho, N., Yu, M., Lehrer, J., Alshalalfa, M., Speers, C., Cooperberg, M. R., Kim, W., Ryan, C. J., Den, R. B., Freedland, S. J., Posadas, E., Sandler, H., Klein, E. A., Black, P., Seiler, R., Tomlins, S. A., Chinnaiyan, A. M., Jenkins, R. B., Davicioni, E., Ross, A. E., Schaeffer, E. M., Nguyen, P. L., Carroll, P. R., Karnes, R. J., Spratt, D. E., & Feng, F. Y.
- Venue
- JAMA Oncology
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-12-01
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1663
- ISSN
- 2374-2437 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2613162682
- Cited by
- 308
- References
- 48
- FWCI
- 19.03
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Associations of Luminal and Basal Subtyping of Prostate Cancer With Prognosis and Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0751
- The paper
- Zhao, S. G., Chang, S. L., Erho, N., Yu, M., Lehrer, J., Alshalalfa, M., Speers, C., Cooperberg, M. R., Kim, W., Ryan, C. J., Den, R. B., Freedland, S. J., Posadas, E., Sandler, H., Klein, E. A., Black, P., Seiler, R., Tomlins, S. A., Chinnaiyan, A. M., . . . Feng, F. Y. (2017). Associations of Luminal and Basal Subtyping of Prostate Cancer With Prognosis and Response to Androgen Deprivation Therapy. JAMA Oncology. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0751
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.