Cited by 94Glaucoma and retinal disordersOcular Surface and Contact LensIntraocular Surgery and Lenses

24-Hour Intraocular Pressure Rhythm in Young Healthy Subjects Evaluated With Continuous Monitoring Using a Contact Lens Sensor

Mottet, Benjamin, Aptel, Florent, Romanet, Jean-Paul, Hubanova, Ralitsa, Pépin, Jean-Louis, Chiquet, Christophe·2013·JAMA Ophthalmology

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: This study evaluates a new device that has been proposed to continuously monitor intraocular pressure (IOP) over 24 hours. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate 24-hour IOP rhythm reproducibility during repeated continuous 24-hour IOP monitoring with noncontact tonometry (NCT) and a contact lens sensor (CLS) in healthy participants. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Cross-sectional study of 12 young healthy volunteers at a referral center of chronobiology. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were housed in a sleep laboratory and underwent four 24-hour sessions of IOP measurements over a 6-month period. After initial randomized attribution, the IOP of the first eye was continuously monitored using a CLS and the IOP of the fellow eye was measured hourly using NCT. Two sessions with NCT measurements in 1 eye and CLS measurements in the fellow eye, 1 session with CLS measurements in only 1 eye, and 1 session with NCT measurements in both eyes were performed. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: A nonlinear least squares, dual-harmonic regression analysis was used to model the 24-hour IOP rhythm. Comparison of acrophase, bathyphase, amplitude, midline estimating statistic of rhythm, IOP values, IOP changes, and agreement were evaluated in the 3 tonometry methods. RESULTS: A significant nyctohemeral IOP rhythm was found in 31 of 36 sessions (86%) using NCT and in all sessions (100%) using CLS. Hourly awakening during NCT IOP measurements did not significantly change the mean phases of the 24-hour IOP pattern evaluated using CLS in the contralateral eye. Throughout the sessions, intraclass correlation coefficients of the CLS acrophase (0.6 [95% CI, 0.0 to 0.9]; P = .03), CLS bathyphase (0.7 [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.9]; P = .01), NCT amplitude (0.7 [95% CI, 0.1 to 0.9]; P = .01), and NCT midline estimating statistic of rhythm (0.9 [95% CI, 0.9 to 1.0]; P < .01) were significant. When performing NCT measurements in 1 eye and CLS measurements in the contralateral eye, the IOP change at each point normalized from the first measurement (9 am) was not symmetric individually or within the population. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The CLS is an accurate and reproducible method to characterize the nyctohemeral IOP rhythm in healthy participants but does not allow for estimating the IOP value in millimeters of mercury corresponding to the relative variation of the electrical signal measured.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2013.5297

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other electrochemical sensors embedded in contact lenses were utilized to quantify lactate concentration in 35 s with 53 μA mm−1 resolution.

    “Other electrochemical sensors embedded in contact lenses were utilized to quantify lactate concentration in 35 s with 53 µA mm −1 resolution.65”

    From Wearables in Medicine (2018) · cites this paper as [65]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mottet, B., Aptel, F., Romanet, J.-P., Hubanova, R., Pépin, J.-L., & Chiquet, C.
Affiliations
  • Inserm (FR)
  • Université Joseph Fourier (FR)
Corresponding author
Aptel, Florent
Venue
JAMA Ophthalmology
Published
2013-12-01
Volume
131
Issue
12
Pages
1507
ISSN
2168-6165 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2000111502
Cited by
94
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 12
FWCI
11.74
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Ophthalmology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Glaucoma and retinal disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ocular Surface and Contact Lens
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Intraocular Surgery and Lenses
Keywords
intraocular pressure, contact lens sensor, non-contact tonometry, nyctohemeral rhythm, acrophase, measurement agreement, healthy young adults, chronobiology, sleep laboratory, contralateral eye comparison, device validation
MeSH terms
Circadian Rhythm, Contact Lenses, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Intraocular Pressure, Male, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Telemetry, Tonometry, Ocular, Reproducibility of Results, Monitoring, Ambulatory, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review