Association of Weekly Protected Nonclinical Time With Resident Physician Burnout and Well-being
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Burnout among physicians is high, with resulting concern about quality of care. With burnout beginning early in physician training, much-needed data are lacking on interventions to decrease burnout and improve well-being among resident physicians. Objectives: To design a departmental-level burnout intervention, evaluate its association with otolaryngology residents' burnout and well-being, and describe how residents used and perceived the study intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants: A prospective, nonrandomized crossover study was conducted from September 25, 2017, to June 24, 2018, among all 19 current residents in the Department of Otolaryngology at the University of Minnesota. Statistical analysis was performed from June 28 to August 7, 2018. Interventions: All participants were assigned 2 hours per week of protected nonclinical time alternating with a control period of no intervention at 6-week intervals. Main Outcomes and Measures: Burnout was measured by the Maslach Burnout Inventory and Mini-Z Survey. Well-being was measured by the Resident and Fellow Well-Being Index and a quality-of-life single-item self-assessment. In addition to a baseline demographic survey, participants completed the aforementioned surveys at approximately 6-week intervals during the study period. Results: Among the 19 residents in the study (10 men [53%]), the overall protected time intervention (week 0 to week 32) was associated with a mean decrease of 0.63 points (95% CI, -1.03 to -0.22 points) in the Maslach Burnout Inventory emotional exhaustion score, indicating a clinically meaningful decrease in burnout, and a mean decrease of 1.26 points (95% CI, -2.18 to -0.34 points) in the Resident and Fellow Well-Being Index score, indicating a clinically meaningful improvement in well-being. The baseline to week 32 mean changes in the Maslach Burnout Inventory depersonalization score, Maslach Burnout Inventory personal accomplishment score, and quality-of-life single-item self-assessment were not clinically meaningful. There were clinically meaningful improvements in 4 of 6 tested Mini-Z Questionnaire items from baseline to week 32: job stress (weighted κ statistic, 0.21; 95% CI, -0.11 to 0.53), burnout (weighted κ statistic, 0.25; 95% CI, -0.02 to 0.53), control over workload (weighted κ statistic, 0.26; 95% CI, -0.01 to 0.53), and sufficient time for documentation (weighted κ statistic, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.08 to 0.54). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that 2 hours per week of protected nonclinical time was associated with decreased burnout and increased well-being in a small sample of otolaryngology residents. Future randomized clinical studies in larger cohorts are warranted to infer causality of decreased burnout and increased well-being as a result of protected nonclinical time.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the organizational work-hour intervention subgroup, there was no significant post-intervention effect across all outcome domains: EE -0.20 (95% CI -0.58 to 0.17, p = 0.29, I2 = 67.1%), DP -0.16 (95% CI -0.48 to 0.16, p = 0.33, I2 = 55.8%), and PA 0.04 (95% CI -0.12 to 0.20, p = 0.60, I2 = 0%).
“Subgroup analyses revealed no post-intervention Cohen’s d SMD in work-hour interventions [44, 45, 47, 73, 76] across all outcome domains: EE (-0.20, 95% CI -0.58 to 0.17, p = 0.29, I2 = 67.1%), DP (-0.16, 95% CI -0.48 to 0.16, p = 0.33, I2 = 55.8%), and PA (0.04, 95% CI -0.12 to 0.20, p = 0.60, I2 = 0%).”
From Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
Organizational interventions showed no statistically significant association with any burnout domain (EE, DP, PA).
“In organizational intervention studies [44, 45, 47–49, 73, 76], pooling of post-intervention intervention Cohen’s d SMD yielded non-statistically significant resulted in all outcomes, EE (-0.22, 95% CI -0.47 to 0.04, p = 0.10, I2 = 62.6%) (Fig. 3A), DP (-0.15, 95% CI -0.38 to 0.08, p = 0.21, I2 = 53.0%) (Fig. 3B), and PA (0.12, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.25, p = 0.07; I2 = 0%) (Fig. 3C).”
From Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
Outcome measurements were conducted using various versions of the validated Maslach Burnout Inventory (MBI): 26 studies used the 22-item MBI, 5 used the 9-item MBI, 1 used the 20-item Dutch version, and 1 used the 16-item MBI.
“Outcome measurements were conducted using various versions of the validated MBI. Specifically, 26 studies (78.7%) used the 22-item MBI [44, 45, 47–49, 51, 52, 54, 56, 58, 60–65, 67, 68, 70–76], 5 studies (15.2%) employed the 9-item MBI [50, 53, 55, 59, 69], 1 study (3.0%) used the 20-item Dutch version of the MBI [57], and 1 study (3.0%) utilized the 16-item MBI [66].”
From Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
The majority of studies employed non-randomized, non-concurrent designs, with 9 using historical controls, 13 utilizing self-control studies, and 11 randomized controlled concurrent trials.
“The majority of studies employed non-randomized, non-concurrent designs, with 9 (27.2%) using historical controls [44, 48, 49, 56, 59, 68, 71, 75, 76] and 13 (39.4%) utilizing self-control studies [47, 50, 53, 54, 58, 61, 65–67, 69, 70, 72, 73]. Eleven (33.3%) studies were randomized, controlled, concurrent trials [45, 51, 52, 55, 57, 60–64, 74].”
From Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [47]
Cites
Interventions to prevent and reduce physician burnout: a systematic review and meta-analysis
West, C. P., Dyrbye, L. N., Erwin, P. J., & Shanafelt, T. D. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31279-x · Cited by 2,362 · see citing works
Arndt, B. G., Beasley, J. W., Watkinson, M. D., Temte, J. L., Tuan, W.-J., Sinsky, C. A., & Gilchrist, V. J. (2017) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.2121 · Cited by 972 · see citing works
Melamed, S., Shirom, A., Toker, S., Berliner, S., & Shapira, I. (2006) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.132.3.327 · Cited by 943 · see citing works
Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Rathert, C. (2008) · Health Care Management Review · doi:10.1097/01.hmr.0000304493.87898.72 · Cited by 519 · see citing works
Golub, J. S., Weiss, P. S., Ramesh, A. K., Ossoff, R. H., & Johns, M. M. (2007) · Academic Medicine · doi:10.1097/acm.0b013e3180556825 · Cited by 175 · see citing works
Reducing stress and burnout in junior doctors: the impact of debriefing sessions
Gunasingam, N., Burns, K., Edwards, J., Dinh, M., & Walton, M. (2015) · Postgraduate Medical Journal · doi:10.1136/postgradmedj-2014-132847 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Impact of a brief intervention on the burnout levels of pediatric residents
Martins, A. E., Davenport, M. C., Valle, M. D. L. P. D., Lalla, S. D., Domínguez, P., Ormando, L., Ingratta, A., Gambarini, H., & Ferrero, F. (2011) · Jornal de Pediatria · doi:10.2223/jped.2127 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Temporal Associations Between EHR-Derived Workload, Burnout, and Errors: a Prospective Cohort Study
Lou, S. S., Lew, D., Harford, D. R., Lu, C., Evanoff, B. A., Duncan, J. G., & Kannampallil, T. (2022) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-022-07620-3 · Cited by 46 · see citing works
Weitzman, R. E., Wong, K., Worrall, D. M., Park, C., McKee, S., Tufts, R. E., Teng, M. S., & Iloreta, A. M. (2021) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.29529 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Kiratipaisarl, W., Surawattanasakul, V., & Sirikul, W. (2024) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-024-06195-3 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
“%) utilizing self-control studies [47, 50, 53, 54, 58, 61, 65–67, 69, 70, 72, 73].”
BackgroundInfluential
- Authors
- Stevens, K., Davey, C., & Lassig, A. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Minnesota (US)
- Corresponding author
- Stevens, Kristin
- Venue
- JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2020-02-01
- Volume
- 146
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 168
- ISSN
- 2168-6181 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7018397
- OpenAlex
- W2997495199
- Cited by
- 48
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6
- FWCI
- 7.31
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (UL1TR002494)
- National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Keywords
- physician well-being, otolaryngology residents, residency training, burnout intervention, emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, personal accomplishment, occupational stress, quality of life, Maslach Burnout Inventory, work-life balance
- MeSH terms
- Work-Life Balance, Burnout, Professional, Female, Humans, Internship and Residency, Male, Otolaryngology, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Workload, Cross-Over Studies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review