Cited by 14Obstructive Sleep Apnea ResearchAllergic Rhinitis and SensitizationNasal Surgery and Airway Studies

Association of Allergic Rhinitis With Change in Nasal Congestion in New Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Users

Open access
Skirko, Jonathan R., James, Kathryn T., Shusterman, Dennis J., Weaver, Edward M.·2020·JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery

Abstract

Importance: Nasal congestion occurring after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment initiation impairs CPAP adherence. Allergic rhinitis is associated with worsening nasal congestion in patients who are exposed to nonallergic triggers. Use of CPAP presents potential nonallergic triggers (eg, humidity, temperature, pressure, and airflow). Objective: To compare nasal congestion among CPAP users with allergic rhinitis, nonallergic rhinitis, and no rhinitis. We hypothesize that CPAP patients with baseline allergic rhinitis are more likely to experience a worsening of nasal congestion (or less improvement in nasal congestion) compared with patients with no baseline rhinitis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This prospective cohort study included consecutive patients newly diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea in a tertiary sleep center who were using CPAP therapy 3 months after diagnosis. Baseline rhinitis status was assigned as allergic rhinitis, nonallergic rhinitis, or no rhinitis, based on questionnaire responses and past allergy testing. Data were collected from 2004 to 2008 and analyzed from July 2019 to February 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: At baseline before CPAP exposure and again 3 months later, subjective nasal congestion was measured with the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and a visual analog scale (VAS), each scored from 0 to 100 (100 = worst congestion). Changes in nasal congestion were tested over 3 months for the whole cohort, within each rhinitis subgroup (paired t test), and between rhinitis subgroups (multivariate linear regression). Results: The study cohort comprised 102 participants, of whom 61 (60%) were male and the mean (SD) age was 50 (13). The study included 23 (22.5%) participants with allergic rhinitis, 67 (65.7%) with nonallergic rhinitis, and 12 (11.8%) with no rhinitis. Nasal congestion improved from baseline to 3 months in the whole cohort (mean [SD] NOSE score, 38 [26] to 27 [23], mean [SD] change, -10 [23]; 95% CI, -15 to -6; mean [SD] VAS score, 41 [27] to 32 [28]; mean [SD] change, -10 [26]; 95% CI, [-15 to -4]) and in each rhinitis subgroup. Adjusted improvement in nasal congestion at 3 months was significantly less in the allergic rhinitis subgroup compared with the no rhinitis subgroup (positive difference means less improvement) compared with baseline: NOSE score 14 (95% CI, 1 to 28) and VAS score 15 (95% CI, 0 to 30). Conclusions and Relevance: Initiation of CPAP was associated with improved subjective nasal congestion, but less improvement in patients with baseline allergic rhinitis. Baseline allergic rhinitis may predict which patients are more vulnerable to potential congestive effects of CPAP.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0261

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • One cohort study found CPAP users with baseline allergic rhinitis have less improvement in nasal obstruction than those without allergic rhinitis.

    “One cohort study found that CPAP users with baseline AR have less improvement in nasal obstruction than those without AR.1174”

    From International Consensus Statement on Obstructive Sleep Apnea (2023) · cites this paper as [1174]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skirko, J. R., James, K. T., Shusterman, D. J., & Weaver, E. M.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Skirko, Jonathan R.
Venue
JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery
Published
2020-06-01
Volume
146
Issue
6
Pages
523
ISSN
2168-6181 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3015961580
Cited by
14
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Otolaryngology–Head & Neck Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL084139, K23HL068849)
  • National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (T32DC000018)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
Keywords
allergic rhinitis, nasal congestion, continuous positive airway pressure, obstructive sleep apnea, CPAP adherence, non-allergic rhinitis, nasal obstruction, Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation, CPAP side effects
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Rhinitis, Nasal Obstruction, Disease Progression, Sleep Apnea, Obstructive, Continuous Positive Airway Pressure, Rhinitis, Allergic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review