Cited by 514Nasal Surgery and Airway StudiesSinusitis and nasal conditionsObstructive Sleep Apnea Research

Outcomes after Nasal Septoplasty: Results from the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness (NOSE) Study

Stewart, Michael G., Smith, Timothy L., Weaver, Edward M., Witsell, David L., Yueh, Bevan, Hannley, Maureen T., Johnson, Jonas T., The Nose Study Investigators·2004·Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery

Abstract

Objective Our goal was to assess disease-specific quality of life outcomes after nasal septoplasty in adults with nasal obstruction. Design, settings, and patients We conducted a prospective observational outcomes multicenter study with 14 sites and 16 investigators, including private practice and academic settings. Patients had had septal deviation and symptomatic nasal obstruction for at least 3 months, and medical management had failed. Methods Patients with septal deviation completed a validated outcomes instrument (the Nasal Obstruction Septoplasty Effectiveness [NOSE] scale) before and 3 and 6 months after septoplasty, with or without partial turbinectomy. Results Fifty-nine patients underwent surgery; there was a significant improvement in mean NOSE score at 3 months after septoplasty (67.5 versus 23.1, P Conclusions In patients with septal deformity, nasal septoplasty results in significant improvement in disease-specific quality of life, high patient satisfaction, and decreased medication use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.otohns.2003.12.004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Endoscopic surgical treatment is beneficial in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps who have severe symptoms and do not respond to appropriate medical treatment.

    “In CRS with NP , endoscopic surgical treatment has been shown to be beneficial in patients with severe symptoms who do not respond to appropriate medical treatment [20,127,128,212-218] and may be more cost-effective [219,220].”

    From Position Paper on Nasal Obstruction: Evaluation and Treatment (2018) · cites this paper as [213]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Stewart, M. G., Smith, T. L., Weaver, E. M., Witsell, D. L., Yueh, B., Hannley, M. T., Johnson, J. T., & The Nose Study Investigators
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • Medical College of Wisconsin (US)
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
Corresponding author
Stewart, Michael G.
Venue
Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-03
Volume
130
Issue
3
Pages
283-290
ISSN
  • 0161-6439 (ISSN-L)
  • 0194-5998
  • 1097-6817
OpenAlex
W1972210561
Cited by
514
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 23 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 36 · 2020: 46 · 2019: 35 · 2018: 37 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 37 · 2014: 20 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 21
FWCI
6.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Otolaryngology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL068849, HL068849)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research
Keywords
septoplasty, nasal obstruction, septal deviation, quality of life, NOSE scale, patient satisfaction, turbinate reduction, surgical outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Humans, Male, Nasal Septum, Nose Diseases, Prospective Studies, Quality of Life, Otorhinolaryngologic Surgical Procedures, Nasal Obstruction, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review