CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 567Schizophrenia research and treatmentBipolar Disorder and TreatmentPsychiatric care and mental health services

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Recovery in Remitted First-Episode Psychosis at 7 Years of Follow-up of an Early Dose Reduction/Discontinuation or Maintenance Treatment Strategy: Long-term Follow-up of a 2-Year Randomized Clinical Trial

Wunderink, Lex, Nieboer, Roeline M., Wiersma, Durk, Sytema, Sjoerd, Nienhuis, Fokko J.·2013·JAMA Psychiatry
DOI 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.19
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Short-term outcome studies of antipsychotic dose-reduction/discontinuation strategies in patients with remitted first-episode psychosis (FEP) showed higher relapse rates but no other disadvantages compared with maintenance treatment; however, long-term effects on recovery have not been studied before. OBJECTIVE: To compare rates of recovery in patients with remitted FEP after 7 years of follow-up of a dose reduction/discontinuation (DR) vs maintenance treatment (MT) trial. DESIGN: Seven-year follow-up of a 2-year open randomized clinical trial comparing MT and DR. SETTING: One hundred twenty-eight patients participating in the original trial were recruited from 257 patients with FEP referred from October 2001 to December 2002 to 7 mental health care services in a 3.2 million-population catchment area. Of these, 111 patients refused to participate and 18 patients did not experience remission. PARTICIPANTS After 7 years, 103 patients (80.5%) of 128 patients who were included in the original trial were located and consented to follow-up assessment. INTERVENTION: After 6 months of remission, patients were randomly assigned to DR strategy or MT for 18 months. After the trial, treatment was at the discretion of the clinician. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Primary outcome was rate of recovery, defined as meeting the criteria of symptomatic and functional remission. Determinants of recovery were examined using logistic regression analysis; the treatment strategy (MT or DR) was controlled for baseline parameters. RESULTS: The DR patients experienced twice the recovery rate of the MT patients (40.4% vs 17.6%). Logistic regression showed an odds ratio of 3.49 (P = .01). Better DR recovery rates were related to higher functional remission rates in the DR group but were not related to symptomatic remission rates. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Dose reduction/discontinuation of antipsychotics during the early stages of remitted FEP shows superior long-term recovery rates compared with the rates achieved with MT. To our knowledge, this is the first study showing long-term gains of an early-course DR strategy in patients with remitted FEP. Additional studies are necessary before these results are incorporated into general practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: isrctn.org Identifier: ISRCTN16228411.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.19

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 24 references

1 of the 24 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 301–400 of 567

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Wunderink, L., Nieboer, R. M., Wiersma, D., Sytema, S., & Nienhuis, F. J.
Affiliations
University Medical Center Groningen (NL)
Corresponding author
Wunderink, Lex
ORCID
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Publisher
American Medical Association (AMA)
Published
2013-09-01
Volume
70
Issue
9
Pages
913
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.19
OpenAlex
W2125616168
Cited by
567
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 27 · 2024: 31 · 2023: 39 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 42 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 59 · 2017: 43 · 2016: 65 · 2015: 42 · 2014: 36 · 2013: 8
FWCI
35.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion)
  • University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
Keywords
first-episode psychosis, remission, antipsychotic dose reduction, antipsychotic discontinuation, long-term antipsychotic treatment, long-term recovery, functional remission, symptom remission, relapse
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Long-Term Care, Male, Psychotic Disorders, Recurrence, Remission Induction, Antipsychotic Agents, Treatment Outcome, Age of Onset, Young Adult, Maintenance Chemotherapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review