Cited by 77Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderNeurotransmitter Receptor Influence on BehaviorSchizophrenia research and treatment

Age-Dependent Effects of Methylphenidate on the Human Dopaminergic System in Young vs Adult Patients With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Schrantee, Anouk, Tamminga, Hyke G. H., Bouziane, Cheima, Bottelier, Marco A., Bron, Esther E., Mutsaerts, Henk-Jan M. M., Zwinderman, Aeilko H., Groote, Inge R. +10 more·2016·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Although numerous children receive methylphenidate hydrochloride for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), little is known about age-dependent and possibly lasting effects of methylphenidate on the human dopaminergic system. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the effects of methylphenidate on the dopaminergic system are modified by age and to test the hypothesis that methylphenidate treatment of young but not adult patients with ADHD induces lasting effects on the cerebral blood flow response to dopamine challenge, a noninvasive probe for dopamine function. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (Effects of Psychotropic Drugs on Developing Brain-Methylphenidate) among ADHD referral centers in the greater Amsterdam area in the Netherlands between June 1, 2011, and June 15, 2015. Additional inclusion criteria were male sex, age 10 to 12 years or 23 to 40 years, and stimulant treatment-naive status. INTERVENTIONS: Treatment with either methylphenidate or a matched placebo for 16 weeks. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Change in the cerebral blood flow response to an acute challenge with methylphenidate, noninvasively assessed using pharmacological magnetic resonance imaging, between baseline and 1 week after treatment. Data were analyzed using intent-to-treat analyses. RESULTS: Among 131 individuals screened for eligibility, 99 patients met DSM-IV criteria for ADHD, and 50 participants were randomized to receive methylphenidate and 49 to placebo. Sixteen weeks of methylphenidate treatment increased the cerebral blood flow response to methylphenidate within the thalamus (mean difference, 6.5; 95% CI, 0.4-12.6; P = .04) of children aged 10 to 12 years old but not in adults or in the placebo group. In the striatum, the methylphenidate condition differed significantly from placebo in children but not in adults (mean difference, 7.7; 95% CI, 0.7-14.8; P = .03). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: We confirm preclinical data and demonstrate age-dependent effects of methylphenidate treatment on human extracellular dopamine striatal-thalamic circuitry. Given its societal relevance, these data warrant replication in larger groups with longer follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: identifier: NL34509.000.10 and trialregister.nl identifier: NTR3103.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.1572

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In pre-pubertal children, exposure to methylphenidate produces an enduring increase in methylphenidate-stimulated blood flow in the striatum and thalamus, with no significant change observed in adult-exposed subjects.

    “Moreover, in pre-pubertal children exposure to methylphenidate produces an enduring increase in methylphenidate-stimulated blood flow in the STR and thalamus, with no significant change observed in adult-exposed subjects (Schrantee et al., 2016).”

    From Sensitive periods of substance abuse: Early risk for the transition to dependence (2017) · cites this paper as Schrantee et al., 2016

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]Center for Drug Evaluation and Research Medical review: Focalin XR Silver Spring, MD US Food and Drug Administration 2004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schrantee, A., Tamminga, H. G. H., Bouziane, C., Bottelier, M. A., Bron, E. E., Mutsaerts, H.-J. M. M., Zwinderman, A. H., Groote, I. R., Rombouts, S. A. R. B., Lindauer, R. J. L., Klein, S., Niessen, W. J., Opmeer, B. C., Boer, F., Lucassen, P. J., Andersen, S. L., Geurts, H. M., & Reneman, L.
Affiliations
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Erasmus MC (NL)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Leiden University (NL)
  • Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands13De Bascule Academic Center for Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • Harvard University (US)
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2016-09-01
Volume
73
Issue
9
Pages
955
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2484812056
Cited by
77
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Leiden Repository (Leiden University) (submittedVersion)
  • RePub (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Universiteit van Amsterdam
  • Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091114)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA026485, R01DA015403)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
methylphenidate, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, dopaminergic system, age-dependent effects, cerebral blood flow, striatum, thalamus, developing brain, children, adults, pharmacological MRI
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Brain, Child, Corpus Striatum, Dopamine, Double-Blind Method, Gyrus Cinguli, Humans, Long-Term Care, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Methylphenidate, Nerve Net, Receptors, Dopamine, Regional Blood Flow, Thalamus, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review