Cited by 423Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesAutism Spectrum Disorder Research

The World Health Organization Adult Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Self-Report Screening Scale for DSM-5

Open access
Ustun, Berk, Adler, Lenard A., Rudin, Cynthia, Faraone, Stephen V., Spencer, Thomas J., Berglund, Patricia, Gruber, Michael J., Kessler, Ronald C.·2017·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

Importance: Recognition that adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is common, seriously impairing, and usually undiagnosed has led to the development of adult ADHD screening scales for use in community, workplace, and primary care settings. However, these scales are all calibrated to DSM-IV criteria, which are narrower than the recently developed DSM-5 criteria. Objectives: To update for DSM-5 criteria and improve the operating characteristics of the widely used World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) for screening. Design, Setting, and Participants: Probability subsamples of participants in 2 general population surveys (2001-2003 household survey [n = 119] and 2004-2005 managed care subscriber survey [n = 218]) who completed the full 29-question self-report ASRS, with both subsamples over-sampling ASRS-screened positives, were blindly administered a semistructured research diagnostic interview for DSM-5 adult ADHD. In 2016, the Risk-Calibrated Supersparse Linear Integer Model, a novel machine-learning algorithm designed to create screening scales with optimal integer weights and limited numbers of screening questions, was applied to the pooled data to create a DSM-5 version of the ASRS screening scale. The accuracy of the new scale was then confirmed in an independent 2011-2012 clinical sample of patients seeking evaluation at the New York University Langone Medical Center Adult ADHD Program (NYU Langone) and 2015-2016 primary care controls (n = 300). Data analysis was conducted from April 4, 2016, to September 22, 2016. Main Outcomes and Measures: The sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve (AUC), and positive predictive value (PPV) of the revised ASRS. Results: Of the total 637 participants, 44 (37.0%) household survey respondents, 51 (23.4%) managed care respondents, and 173 (57.7%) NYU Langone respondents met DSM-5 criteria for adult ADHD in the semistructured diagnostic interview. Of the respondents who met DSM-5 criteria for adult ADHD, 123 were male (45.9%); mean (SD) age was 33.1 (11.4) years. A 6-question screening scale was found to be optimal in distinguishing cases from noncases in the first 2 samples. Operating characteristics were excellent at the diagnostic threshold in the weighted (to the 8.2% DSM-5/Adult ADHD Clinical Diagnostic Scale population prevalence) data (sensitivity, 91.4%; specificity, 96.0%; AUC, 0.94; PPV, 67.3%). Operating characteristics were similar despite a much higher prevalence (57.7%) when the scale was applied to the NYU Langone clinical sample (sensitivity, 91.9%; specificity, 74.0%; AUC, 0.83; PPV, 82.8%). Conclusions and Relevance: The new ADHD screening scale is short, easily scored, detects the vast majority of general population cases at a threshold that also has high specificity and PPV, and could be used as a screening tool in specialty treatment settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.0298

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The introduction of DSM-V might lead to a further increase in adult ADHD prevalence by raising the age-of-onset from seven to 12 years and switching diagnostic emphasis from clinically significant impairments to more lenient symptoms.

    “while the introduction of DSM-V might lead to a further increase by bringing a rise of age-of-onset from seven years to 12 years and switching the diagnostic emphasis from clinically significant impairments to more lenient symptoms [6,30].”

    From The prevalence of adult attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: A global systematic review and meta-analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [30]

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says DSM-5 criteria should increase adult ADHD prevalence because they require fewer symptoms and allow a later age of onset. The ASRS Screening Scale Item Pool section (page unavailable) specifies an onset threshold of age 12, but it also says the diagnoses required clinically significant ADHD-related impairment. The paper therefore does not support the claimed switch away from an impairment requirement. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies of the ASRS-5 found acceptable sensitivity but not specificity in individuals with bipolar disorder and/or borderline personality disorder and other clinical groups.

    “Studies of the ASRS-5 found acceptable sensitivity but not specificity in individuals with bipolar disorder and/or borderline personality disorder (Baggio et al., 2021) and other clinical groups (Ustun et al., 2017).”
  • Other studies of the ASRS-5 have found both specificity and sensitivity levels above 80% in non-clinical controls.

    “Other studies of the DSM-5 version of the ASRS, the ASRS-5, have found both specificity and sensitivity levels above 80% in non-clinical controls (Baggio et al., 2021; Ustun et al., 2017).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 14

  1. de Graaf R, Kessler RC, Fayyad J, et al. The prevalence and effects of adult attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) on the performance of workers: results from the WHO World Mental Health Survey Initiative. Occup Environ Med. 2008;65(12):835-842.
  2. Küpper T, Haavik J, Drexler H, et al. The negative impact of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder on occupational health in adults and adolescents. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2012;85(8):837-847.
  3. Kessler RC, Lane M, Stang PE, Van Brunt DL. The prevalence and workplace costs of adult attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in a large manufacturing firm. Psychol Med. 2009;39(1): 137-147.
  4. Adler LA, Shaw DM, Alperin S. ADHD diagnostic and symptom assessment scales for adults. In: Adler LA, Spencer TJ, Wilens T, eds. Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults and Children. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2014:224-232.
  5. Kessler RC, Adler LA, Gruber MJ, Sarawate CA, Spencer T, Van Brunt DL. Validity of the World Health Organization Adult ADHD Self-Report Scale (ASRS) screener in a representative sample of health plan members. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2007;16(2):52-65.
  6. Kessler RC, Berglund P, Chiu WT, et al. The US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS-R): design and field procedures. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2004;13(2):69-92.
  7. Wender P. Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults. New York, NY: Oxford University Press; 1998.
  8. Adler L, Cohen J. Diagnosis and evaluation of adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2004;27(2):187-201.
  9. Adler LA, Shaw DM, Kovacs K, Alperin S. Diagnosing ADHD in children and adults. In: Adler LA, Spencer TJ, Wilens T, eds. Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Adults and Children. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2014:16-23.
  10. Ustun B, Rudin C. Learning optimized risk scores on large-scaled datasets. arXiv:1610.00168. http://arxiv.org/abs/1610.00168. Updated February 7, 2017. Accessed October 1, 2016. · arXiv
  11. Ustun B, Rudin C. Supersparse linear integer models for optimized medical scoring systems. Mach Learn. 2016;102(3):349-391.
  12. Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143(1):29-36.
  13. Kohavi R. A study of cross-validation and bootstrap for accuracy estimation and model selection. International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Burlington, MA: Morgan Kaufmann; 1995:1137-1143.
  14. Wynants L, Bouwmeester W, Moons KG, et al. A simulation study of sample size demonstrated the importance of the number of events per variable to develop prediction models in clustered data. J Clin Epidemiol. 2015;68(12):1406-1414.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ustun, B., Adler, L. A., Rudin, C., Faraone, S. V., Spencer, T. J., Berglund, P., Gruber, M. J., & Kessler, R. C.
Affiliations
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology (US)
  • NYU Langone Health (US)
  • Duke University (US)
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Michigan (US)
Corresponding author
Kessler, Ronald C.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2017-05-01
Volume
74
Issue
5
Pages
520
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2604231045
Cited by
423
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 50 · 2025: 60 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 71 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
20.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Eli Lilly and Company
  • Pan American Health Organization
  • National Institute of Mental Health
  • Fogarty International Center
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Keywords
adult ADHD, ADHD screening, DSM-5 diagnostic criteria, machine learning, screening accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, primary care, managed care
MeSH terms
Machine Learning, Adolescent, Adult, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Female, Humans, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Sensitivity and Specificity, World Health Organization, Reproducibility of Results, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Young Adult, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review