The DOI matches its Crossref record; 91 of the 91 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Efficacy and Safety of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors, Serotonin-Norepinephrine Reuptake Inhibitors, and Placebo for Common Psychiatric Disorders Among Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Open accessAbstract
Importance: Depressive disorders (DDs), anxiety disorders (ADs), obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD), and posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) are common mental disorders in children and adolescents. Objective: To examine the relative efficacy and safety of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and placebo for the treatment of DD, AD, OCD, and PTSD in children and adolescents. Data Sources: PubMed, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Cochrane Database from inception through August 7, 2016. Study Selection: Published and unpublished randomized clinical trials of SSRIs or SNRIs in youths with DD, AD, OCD, or PTSD were included. Trials using other antidepressants (eg, tricyclic antidepressants, monoamine oxidase inhibitors) were excluded. Data Extraction and Synthesis: Effect sizes, calculated as standardized mean differences (Hedges g) and risk ratios (RRs) for adverse events, were assessed in a random-effects model. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes, as defined by authors on preintervention and postintervention data, mean change data, and adverse event data, were extracted independently by multiple observers following PRISMA guidelines. Results: Thirty-six trials were eligible, including 6778 participants (3484 [51.4%] female; mean [SD] age, 12.9 [5.1] years); 17 studies for DD, 10 for AD, 8 for OCD, and 1 for PTSD. Analysis showed that SSRIs and SNRIs were significantly more beneficial compared with placebo, yielding a small effect size (g = 0.32; 95% CI, 0.25-0.40; P < .001). Anxiety disorder (g = 0.56; 95% CI, 0.40-0.72; P < .001) showed significantly larger between-group effect sizes than DD (g = 0.20; 95% CI, 0.13-0.27; P < .001). This difference was driven primarily by the placebo response: patients with DD exhibited significantly larger placebo responses (g = 1.57; 95% CI, 1.36-1.78; P < .001) compared with those with AD (g = 1.03; 95% CI, 0.84-1.21; P < .001). The SSRIs produced a relatively large effect size for ADs (g = 0.71; 95% CI, 0.45-0.97; P < .001). Compared with participants receiving placebo, patients receiving an antidepressant reported significantly more treatment-emergent adverse events (RR, 1.07; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12; P = .01 or RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.22-1.82; P < .001, depending on the reporting method), severe adverse events (RR, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.34-2.32; P < .001), and study discontinuation due to adverse events (RR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.38-2.32; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with placebo, SSRIs and SNRIs are more beneficial than placebo in children and adolescents; however, the benefit is small and disorder specific, yielding a larger drug-placebo difference for AD than for other conditions. Response to placebo is large, especially in DD. Severe adverse events are significantly more common with SSRIs and SNRIs than placebo.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Unfortunately, current therapeutic tools have failed to reduce the prevalence of depression, with many patients not responding to, and most having significant side effects from, first-line treatments such as selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs)”
From Mechanisms of ketamine and its metabolites as antidepressants (2022) · cites this paper as Locher et al., 2017
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“While this reduction does not lower glutamate levels to the same concentration as healthy controls, it has been shown that antidepressant-treated glutamate levels are positively correlated with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale scores187.”
From Dysregulation of adult hippocampal neuroplasticity in major depression: Pathogenesis and therapeutic implications (2022) · cites this paper as [187]
In the citing paper
“Antidepressants are indicated and used for depressive disorders, anxiety disorders, posttraumatic stress disorder, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, obsessive-compulsive disorder, bulimia nervosa, and binge-eating disorder, among others.[3][4][5]”
From Association of Antidepressant Use With Adverse Health Outcomes: A Systematic Umbrella Review (2019) · cites this paper as [4]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Higgins, J. P. T., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557 · Cited by 63,139
Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test
Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629 · Cited by 56,722
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M., Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000100 · Cited by 28,164
Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions: Cochrane Book Series
(2008) · doi:10.1002/9780470712184 · Cited by 25,048
Wang, G., Ma, R., Qiao, G., Wada, K., Aizawa, Y., & Satoh, T. (2015) · Integrative Medicine International · doi:10.1159/000368408 · Cited by 18,762
Operating characteristics of a rank correlation test for publication bias
Begg, C. B., & Mazumdar, M. (1994) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533446 · Cited by 16,955
Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000) · Biometrics · doi:10.1111/j.0006-341x.2000.00455.x · Cited by 14,099
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [25]Hedges LV Olkin I Statistical methods for meta-analysis Academic press 2014
- [75]Rutherford BR Sneed JR Tandler JM Rindskopf D Peterson BS Roose SP Deconstructing pediatric depression trials: An analysis of the effect of expectancy and theurapeutic contact J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2011 50 8 782 795 21784298 PMC3143372
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Penninx, B. W., Pine, D. S., Holmes, E. A., & Reif, A. (2021) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(21)00359-7 · Cited by 740
Self-citationAdolescent and adult differences in major depression symptom profiles
Rice, F. J., Riglin, L., Lomax, T., Souter, E., Potter, R. C., Smıth, D. J., Thapar, A. K., & Thapar, A. (2018) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jad.2018.09.015 · Cited by 465
Tartt, A. N., Mariani, M. B., Hen, R., Mann, J. J., & Boldrini, M. (2022) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/s41380-022-01520-y · Cited by 408
Zhou, X., Teng, T., Zhang, Y., Del Giovane, C., Furukawa, T. A., Weisz, J. R., Li, X., Cuijpers, P., Coghill, D., Xiang, Y., et al. (2020) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(20)30137-1 · Cited by 367
Metadata
- Authors
- Locher, C., Koechlin, H., Zion, S. R., Werner, C., Pine, D. S., Kirsch, I., Kessler, R. C., & Kossowsky, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Basel (CH)
- Boston Children's Hospital (US)
- Stanford University (US)
- National Institute of Mental Health (US)
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center (US)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kossowsky, Joe
- ORCID
- Venue
- JAMA Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2017-10-01
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1011
- ISSN
- 2168-622X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC5667359
- OpenAlex
- W2752088033
- Cited by
- 360
- References
- 90
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 48 · 2018: 30 · 2017: 3
- FWCI
- 23.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (ZIA‐MH002781)
- U.S. National Library of Medicine (T15LM007092)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Keywords
- selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, children and adolescents, depression, anxiety disorders, obsessive-compulsive disorder, post-traumatic stress disorder, placebo response, adverse drug reactions, antidepressant efficacy, antidepressant safety, treatment-resistant depression, treatment-emergent mania, suicidal ideation
- MeSH terms
- Serotonin and Noradrenaline Reuptake Inhibitors, Adolescent, Mental Disorders, Child, Female, Humans, Male, Treatment Outcome, Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review