Trends in treatment and spending for patients receiving outpatient treatment of depression in the United States, 1998-2015
Open accessAbstract
Context: After marked increases from 1987 to 1997, trends in depression treatment in the United States increased modestly from 1998 to 2007. However, multiple policy changes that expanded insurance coverage for mental health conditions may have shifted these trends again since 2007. Objective: To examine national trends in outpatient treatment of depression from 1998 to 2015, with particular focus on 2007 to 2015. Design, Setting, and Participants: This analysis of the use of health services and spending for treatment of depression in the United States assessed data from the 1998 (n = 22 953), 2007 (n = 29 370), and 2015 (n = 33 893) Medical Expenditure Panel Surveys (MEPSs). Participants included respondent households to the nationally representative survey. Data were analyzed from June 15 through December 18, 2018. Main Outcomes and Measures: Rates of outpatient and pharmaceutical treatment of depression; counts of outpatient visits, psychotherapy visits, and prescriptions; and expenditures. Results: The analysis included 86 216 individuals from the 1998, 2007, and 2015 MEPSs. Respondents' mean (SD) age was 37.2 (22.7) years; 45 086 (52.3%) were female, 24 312 (28.2%) were Hispanic, 15 463 (17.9%) were black, and 62 926 (72.9%) were white. Rates of outpatient treatment of depression increased from 2.36 (95% CI, 2.12-2.61) per 100 population in 1998 to 3.47 (95% CI, 3.16-3.79) per 100 population in 2015. The proportion of respondents who were treated for depression using psychotherapy decreased from 53.7% (95% CI, 48.3%-59.1%) in 1998 to 43.2% (95% CI, 39.0%-47.4%) in 2007 and then increased to 50.4% (95% CI, 46.0%-54.9%) in 2015, whereas the proportion receiving pharmacotherapy remained steady at 81.9% (95% CI, 77.9%-85.9%) in 1998, 82.4% (95% CI, 79.3%-85.4%) in 2007, and 80.8% (95% CI, 77.9%-83.7%) in 2015. After adjusting for inflation using 2015 US dollars, prescription expenditures for these individuals decreased from $848 (95% CI, $713-$984) per year in 1998 to $603 (95% CI, $484-$722) per year in 2015, whereas the mean number of prescriptions decreased from 7.64 (95% CI, 6.61-8.67) in 1998 to 7.03 (95% CI, 6.51-7.56) in 2015. National expenditures for outpatient treatment of depression increased from $12 430 000 000 in 1997 to $15 554 000 000 in 2007 and then to $17 404 000 000 in 2015, consistent with a slowing growth in national outpatient expenditures for depression. The percentage of this spending that came from self-pay (uninsured) individuals decreased from 32% in 1998 to 29% in 2007 and then to 20% in 2015. This decrease was largely associated with increasing Medicaid coverage, because the percentage of this spending covered was 19% in 1998, 15% in 2007, and 36% in 2015. Conclusions and Relevance: Recent policy changes that increased insurance coverage for depression may be associated with reduced uninsured burden and with modest increases in the prevalence of and overall spending for outpatient treatment of depression. The lower-than-expected rate of treatment suggests that substantial barriers remain to individuals receiving treatment for their depression.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Several previous studies using the MEPS have results comparable with results generated from other sources.
“However, there are several previous studies using the MEPS and their results are comparable with results generated from other sources (42–44).”
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study
Spitzer, R. L. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.272.22.1749 · Cited by 2,648 · see citing works
Utility of a New Procedure for Diagnosing Mental Disorders in Primary Care: The PRIME-MD 1000 Study
Spitzer, R. L. (1994) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1994.03520220043029 · Cited by 1,873 · see citing works
The Economic Burden of Adults With Major Depressive Disorder in the United States (2005 and 2010)
Greenberg, P. E., Fournier, A.-A., Sisitsky, T., Pike, C. T., & Kessler, R. C. (2015) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.14m09298 · Cited by 1,779 · see citing works
Kessler, R. C. (2012) · Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.psc.2011.11.005 · Cited by 871 · see citing works
National Trends in the Outpatient Treatment of Depression
Olfson, M. (2002) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.287.2.203 · Cited by 834 · see citing works
Dunn, A., Grosse, S. D., & Zuvekas, S. H. (2018) · Health Services Research · doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12612 · Cited by 494 · see citing works
Walker, E. R., Cummings, J. R., Hockenberry, J. M., & Druss, B. G. (2015) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201400248 · Cited by 392 · see citing works
Self-citationTreatment of Adult Depression in the United States
Olfson, M., Blanco, C., & Marcus, S. C. (2016) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.5057 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Comparing The National Economic Burden Of Five Chronic Conditions
Druss, B. G., Marcus, S. C., Olfson, M., Tanielian, T., Elinson, L., & Pincus, H. A. (2001) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.233 · Cited by 322 · see citing works
Self-citationNational trends in the treatment for depression from 1998 to 2007
Marcus, S. C., & Olfson, M. (2010) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2010.151 · Cited by 312 · see citing works
Effects of Pharmaceutical Promotion on Adherence to the Treatment Guidelines for Depression
Donohue, J. M., Berndt, E. R., Rosenthal, M. B., Epstein, A. M., & Frank, R. G. (2004) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200412000-00004 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Trends in Serious Psychological Distress and Outpatient Mental Health Care of US Adults
Olfson, M., Wang, S., Wall, M. M., Marcus, S. C., & Blanco, C. (2018) · JAMA Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.3550 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
Sensitivity of household reported medical conditions in the medical expenditure panel survey
Machlin, S., Cohen, J., Elixhauser, A., Beauregard, K., & Steiner, C. (2009) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e318195fa79 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Thorpe, K., Jain, S., & Joski, P. (2017) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.2016.0875 · Cited by 41 · see citing works
Self-citationTen-Year Trends in Quality of Care and Spending for Depression
Fullerton, C. A. (2011) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2011.146 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
Generic penetration in the retail antidepressant market.
Ventimiglia, J., & Kalali, A. H. (2010) · PubMed · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Work Requirements in Medicaid for People With Mental Illnesses and Substance Use Disorders
Frank, R. G., & Glied, S. (2018) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.201800126 · Cited by 7 · see citing works
Prescription Drugs And The Slowdown In Health Care Spending
(2015) · Forefront Group · doi:10.1377/forefront.20151118.051820 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Luo, Y., Kataoka, Y., Ostinelli, E. G., Cipriani, A., & Furukawa, T. A. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychiatry · doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00035 · Cited by 206 · see citing works
- Authors
- Hockenberry, J. M., Joski, P., Yarbrough, C., & Druss, B. G.
- Affiliations
- Emory University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Hockenberry, Jason M.
- Venue
- JAMA Psychiatry
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2019-08-01
- Volume
- 76
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 810
- ISSN
- 2168-622X (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6487900
- OpenAlex
- W2942004784
- Cited by
- 122
- References
- 18
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 52 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 5
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
- Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
- Keywords
- depression, outpatient care, mental health service utilization, mental health care costs, psychotherapy, antidepressant prescribing, mental health coverage, Medicare, health care costs, treatment trends, United States, Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
- MeSH terms
- Facilities and Services Utilization, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Health Expenditures, Female, Health Services, Humans, Male, Medicaid, Middle Aged, Outpatients, Drug Prescriptions, Psychotherapy, Psychotropic Drugs, United States, Prevalence, Health Care Surveys, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review