Cited by 291Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation StudiesNeurological disorders and treatmentsTreatment of Major Depression

Functional magnetic resonance imaging-guided personalization of transcranial magnetic stimulation treatment for depression

Open access
Cash, Robin F. H., Cocchi, Luca, Lv, Jinglei, Fitzgerald, Paul B., Zalesky, Andrew·2021·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

This study assesses whether treatment response for depression could be improved via a single one-site-fits-all dorsolateral prefrontal cortex target, representing the group average optimal site of subgenual cingulate cortex functional connectivity, or whether target site personalization is necessary.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2020.3794

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [5]Cash R, Cocchi L, Lv J, Fitzgerald P, Zalesky A. Toward state-of-the-art connectivity-guided TMS: personalization, precision & clinical response. Paper presented at: 26th Annual Meeting of the Organization For Human Brain Mapping; June 23-July 3, 2020; virtual meeting. Accessed October 22, 2020. https://www.humanbrainmapping.org/files/2020/OHBM_2020_Virtual_Abstracts_2.pdf [Google Scholar]

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cash, R. F. H., Cocchi, L., Lv, J., Fitzgerald, P. B., & Zalesky, A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute (AU)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Epworth Hospital (AU)
Corresponding author
Cash, Robin F. H.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2021-03-01
Volume
78
Issue
3
Pages
337
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3109502500
Cited by
291
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 60 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 63 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 1
FWCI
10.16
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
transcranial magnetic stimulation, depression, treatment response, dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, subgenual anterior cingulate cortex, functional connectivity, personalized treatment
MeSH terms
Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex, Adult, Brain Mapping, Depressive Disorder, Major, Major Depressive Disorder, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review