Cited by 26Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesChronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research

Sustained Care Smoking Cessation Intervention for Individuals Hospitalized for Psychiatric Disorders: The Helping HAND 3 Randomized Clinical Trial

Open access
Brown, Richard A., Minami, Haruka, Hecht, Jacki, Kahler, Christopher W., Price, Lawrence H., Kjome, Kimberly L., Bloom, Erika Litvin, Levy, Douglas E. +4 more·2021·JAMA Psychiatry

Abstract

Importance: Smoking among individuals with serious mental illness (SMI) represents a major public health problem. Intervening during a psychiatric hospital stay may provide an opportunity to aid engagement in smoking cessation treatment and facilitate success in quitting. Objective: To examine the effectiveness of a multicomponent, sustained care (SusC) smoking cessation intervention in adults with SMI receiving inpatient psychiatric care. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Helping HAND 3 randomized clinical trial compared SusC with usual care (UC) among individuals with SMI who smoked daily and were receiving inpatient psychiatric care in Austin, Texas, in a single hospital. The study was conducted from July 2015 through August 2019. Interventions: The UC intervention involved brief smoking cessation information, self-help materials and advice from the admitting nurse, and an offer to provide nicotine replacement therapy during hospitalization. The SusC intervention included 4 main components designed to facilitate patient engagement with postdischarge smoking cessation resources: (1) inpatient motivational counseling; (2) free transdermal nicotine patches on discharge; (3) an offer of free postdischarge telephone quitline, text-based, and/or web-based smoking cessation counseling, and (4) postdischarge automated interactive voice response calls or text messages. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was biochemically verified 7-day point-prevalence abstinence at 6-month follow-up. A secondary outcome was self-reported smoking cessation treatment use at 1, 3, and 6 months after discharge. Results: A total of 353 participants were randomized, of whom 342 were included in analyses (mean [SD] age, 35.8 [12.3] years; 268 White individuals [78.4%]; 280 non-Hispanic individuals [81.9%]; 169 women [49.4%]). They reported smoking a mean (SD) of 16.9 (10.4) cigarettes per day. Participants in the SusC group evidenced significantly higher 6-month follow-up point-prevalence abstinence rates than those in the UC group (8.9% vs 3.5%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.95 [95% CI, 1.24-6.99]; P = .01). The number needed to treat was 18.5 (95% CI, 9.6-306.4). A series of sensitivity analyses confirmed effectiveness. Finally, participants in the SusC group were significantly more likely to report using smoking cessation treatment over the 6 months postdischarge compared with participants in the UC group (74.6% vs 40.5%; relative risk, 1.8 [95% CI, 1.51-2.25]; P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: The findings of this randomized clinical trial provide evidence for the effectiveness of a scalable, multicomponent intervention in promoting smoking cessation treatment use and smoking abstinence in individuals with SMI following hospital discharge. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02204956.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2021.0707

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Tobacco smoking is recognized as a major factor contributing to the lower life expectancy of persons with mental disorders.

    “Tobacco smoking is recognized as a major factor contributing to the lower life expectancy of persons with mental disorders 134,135 .”

    From Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [134]

    The opening passage says cigarette smoking is an important modifiable risk factor for excess mortality in people with serious mental illness, who have shorter lifespans than the general population. The citing sentence extends that point to people with mental disorders generally, a broader group than the source specifies. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Lasser K, Boyd JW, Woolhandler S, Himmelstein DU, McCormick D, Bor DH. Smoking and mental illness: a population-based prevalence study. JAMA. 2000;284(20):2606-2610. doi:10.1001/jama.284. 20.2606 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged Ն18 years with mental illness-United States, 2009-2011. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2013;62(5):81-87.
  3. Rigotti NA, Regan S, Levy DE, et al. Sustained care intervention and postdischarge smoking cessation among hospitalized adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2014;312(7):719-728. doi:10. 1001/jama.2014.9237 · DOI
  4. Folstein MF, Robins LN, Helzer JE. The Mini-Mental State Examination. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1983;40(7):812. doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1983. 01790060110016 · DOI
  5. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. 3rd ed. The Guildford Press; 2013.
  6. Miller NH, Smith PM, DeBusk RF, Sobel DS, Taylor CB. Smoking cessation in hospitalized patients: results of a randomized trial. Arch Intern Med. 1997;157(4):409-415. doi:10.1001/archinte.1997. 00440250059007 · DOI
  7. Collins LM. Optimization of Behavioral, Biobehavioral, and Biomedical Interventions: The Multiphase Optimization Strategy (MOST). Springer; 2018.

Authors
Brown, R. A., Minami, H., Hecht, J., Kahler, C. W., Price, L. H., Kjome, K. L., Bloom, E. L., Levy, D. E., Carpenter, K. M., Smith, A., Smits, J. A. J., & Rigotti, N. A.
Affiliations
  • The University of Texas at Austin (US)
  • Fordham University (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Optum (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Brown, Richard A.
Venue
JAMA Psychiatry
Published
2021-08-01
Volume
78
Issue
8
Pages
839
ISSN
2168-622X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3158966543
Cited by
26
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 2
FWCI
2.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • JAMA Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH104562)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (K23DA035288)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
Keywords
smoking cessation, severe mental illness, psychiatric hospitalization, nicotine replacement therapy, nicotine patch, telephone quitline, automated text messaging, interactive voice response, motivational counseling, smoking abstinence, post-discharge follow-up, usual care comparison, number needed to treat
MeSH terms
Cigarette Smoking, Adult, Aftercare, Mental Disorders, Combined Modality Therapy, Counseling, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Inpatients, Male, Middle Aged, Comorbidity, Smoking Cessation, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Young Adult, Tobacco Use Cessation Devices, Motivational Interviewing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review