The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Preoperative Modified FOLFIRINOX Treatment Followed by Capecitabine-Based Chemoradiation for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Trial A021101
Open accessAbstract
IMPORTANCE: Although consensus statements support the preoperative treatment of borderline resectable pancreatic cancer, no prospective, quality-controlled, multicenter studies of this strategy have been conducted. Existing studies are retrospective and confounded by heterogeneity in patients studied, therapeutic algorithms used, and outcomes reported. OBJECTIVE: To determine the feasibility of conducting studies of multimodality therapy for borderline resectable pancreatic cancer in the cooperative group setting. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: A prospective, multicenter, single-arm trial of a multimodality treatment regimen administered within a study framework using centralized quality control with the cooperation of 14 member institutions of the National Clinical Trials Network. Twenty-nine patients with biopsy-confirmed pancreatic cancer preregistered, and 23 patients with tumors who met centrally reviewed radiographic criteria registered. Twenty-two patients initiated therapy (median age, 64 years [range, 50-76 years]; 55% female). Patients registered between May 29, 2013, and February 7, 2014. INTERVENTIONS: Patients received modified FOLFIRINOX treatment (85 mg/m2 of oxaliplatin, 180 mg/m2 of irinotecan hydrochloride, 400 mg/m2 of leucovorin calcium, and then 2400 mg/m2 of 5-fluorouracil for 4 cycles) followed by 5.5 weeks of external-beam radiation (50.4 Gy delivered in 28 daily fractions) with capecitabine (825 mg/m2 orally twice daily) prior to pancreatectomy. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Feasibility, defined by the accrual rate, the safety of the preoperative regimen, and the pancreatectomy rate. RESULTS: The accrual rate of 2.6 patients per month was superior to the anticipated rate. Although 14 of the 22 patients (64% [95% CI, 41%-83%]) had grade 3 or higher adverse events, 15 of the 22 patients (68% [95% CI, 49%-88%]) underwent pancreatectomy. Of these 15 patients, 12 (80%) required vascular resection, 14 (93%) had microscopically negative margins, 5 (33%) had specimens that had less than 5% residual cancer cells, and 2 (13%) had specimens that had pathologic complete responses. The median overall survival of all patients was 21.7 months (95% CI, 15.7 to not reached) from registration. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The successful completion of this collaborative study demonstrates the feasibility of conducting quality-controlled trials for this disease stage in the multi-institutional setting. The data generated by this study and the logistical elements that facilitated the trial's completion are currently being used to develop cooperative group trials with the goal of improving outcomes for this subset of patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01821612.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1992) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-4380-9_25 · Cited by 45,181
Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete Observations
Kaplan, E. L., & Meier, P. (1958) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1958.10501452 · Cited by 39,158
New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1)
Eisenhauer, E. A., Therasse, P., Bogaerts, J., Schwartz, L. H., Sargent, D., Ford, R., Dancey, J., Arbuck, S., Gwyther, S., Mooney, M., et al. (2009) · European Journal of Cancer · doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026 · Cited by 29,534
Self-citation(2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-40618-3 · Cited by 17,242
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Walter, S. D., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2532320 · Cited by 11,668
FOLFIRINOX versus Gemcitabine for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Conroy, T., Desseigne, F., Ychou, M., Bouché, O., Guimbaud, R., Bécouarn, Y., Adenis, A., Raoul, J.-L., Gourgou-Bourgade, S., de la Fouchardière, C., et al. (2011) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1011923 · Cited by 7,810
Practical Statistics for Medical Research.
Bartko, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (1992) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2290246 · Cited by 4,797
A Randomized Trial of Chemoradiotherapy and Chemotherapy after Resection of Pancreatic Cancer
Neoptolemos, J. P., Stocken, D. D., Friess, H., Bassi, C., Dunn, J. A., Hickey, H., Beger, H., Fernandez-Cruz, L., Dervenis, C., Lacaine, F., et al. (2004) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa032295 · Cited by 2,716
Oettle, H., Post, S., Neuhaus, P., Gellert, K., Langrehr, J., Ridwelski, K., Schramm, H., Fahlke, J., Zuelke, C., Burkart, C., et al. (2007) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.297.3.267 · Cited by 2,419
Gillen, S., Schuster, T., Meyer zum Büschenfelde, C., Friess, H., & Kleeff, J. (2010) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000267 · Cited by 1,552
Cited by
Mizrahi, J. D., Surana, R., Valle, J. W., & Shroff, R. T. (2020) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(20)30974-0 · Cited by 2,559
Murphy, J. E., Wo, J. Y., Ryan, D. P., Clark, J. W., Jiang, W., Yeap, B. Y., Drapek, L. C., Ly, L., Baglini, C. V., Blaszkowsky, L. S., et al. (2019) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0892 · Cited by 522
Neoadjuvant therapy for pancreatic cancer
Springfeld, C., Ferrone, C. R., Katz, M. H. G., Philip, P. A., Hong, T. S., Hackert, T., Büchler, M. W., & Neoptolemos, J. (2023) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/s41571-023-00746-1 · Cited by 377
Self-citationKatz, M. H. G., Shi, Q., Meyers, J., Herman, J. M., Chuong, M., Wolpin, B. M., Ahmad, S., Marsh, R., Schwartz, L., Behr, S., et al. (2022) · JAMA Oncology · doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.2319 · Cited by 312
Self-citationCloyd, J. M., Wang, H., Egger, M. E., Tzeng, C.-W. D., Prakash, L. R., Maitra, A., Varadhachary, G. R., Shroff, R., Javle, M., Fogelman, D., et al. (2017) · JAMA Surgery · doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2017.2227 · Cited by 112
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Katz, M. H. G., Shi, Q., Ahmad, S. A., Herman, J. M., Marsh, R. D. W., Collisson, E., Schwartz, L., Frankel, W., Martin, R., Conway, W., Truty, M., Kindler, H., Lowy, A. M., Bekaii-Saab, T., Philip, P., Talamonti, M., Cardin, D., LoConte, N., Shen, P., Hoffman, J. P., & Venook, A. P.
- Venue
- JAMA Surgery
- Publisher
- American Medical Association (AMA)
- Published
- 2016-08-17
- Volume
- 151
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- e161137
- ISSN
- 2168-6254 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2409856225
- Cited by
- 448
- References
- 28
- FWCI
- 22.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative Modified FOLFIRINOX Treatment Followed by Capecitabine-Based Chemoradiation for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Trial A021101. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1137
- The paper
- Katz, M. H. G., Shi, Q., Ahmad, S. A., Herman, J. M., Marsh, R. D. W., Collisson, E., Schwartz, L., Frankel, W., Martin, R., Conway, W., Truty, M., Kindler, H., Lowy, A. M., Bekaii-Saab, T., Philip, P., Talamonti, M., Cardin, D., LoConte, N., Shen, P., . . . Venook, A. P. (2016). Preoperative Modified FOLFIRINOX Treatment Followed by Capecitabine-Based Chemoradiation for Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer: Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Trial A021101. JAMA Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2016.1137
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.