The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Functional significance of psychological variables that are included in the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a Self-Determination Theory approach to the study of attitudes, subjective norms, perceptions of control and intentions
Abstract
We hypothesize that sharing a birthday is sufficient to create a unit relationship. Two studies demonstrated that individuals cooperated more in a prisoners dilemma game when their (fictitious) opponent shared their birthday. They also reacted more negatively to betrayal and were less sensitive to relative gains for self versus other. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The groupthink reformulations [4, 21, 50] has established the relationship between social identity and groupthink symptoms.”
From Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Simulation results show groupthink results in the decrease in the number of explored solution, decision fitness, and the time needed to reach a consensus which is consistent with previous findings [21, 22].”
From Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“While the number of iteration in group decision making is measured to capture the relation between groupthink to a quick decision that shown in experiments [21].”
From Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure (2021) · cites this paper as [21]
In the citing paper
“Wilson et al. (2002) investigated bivariate predictors of different physical activity intensities [49] and found that at mild intensities, associations were significant only for identified regulation; for moderately intense and strenuous exercise, both identified regulation and intrinsic motivation were significant predictors.”
From Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review (2012) · cites this paper as [49]
In the citing paper
“Despite the positive associations with exercise behaviors, the strength of association for introjected regulation appears to be lower compared to self-determined types of motivation, as reported in several studies [e.g., [55,49].”
From Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review (2012) · cites this paper as [49]
Citations
Cites
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022
Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process.
Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.511 · Cited by 6,247
Prediction of goal-directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4 · Cited by 5,718
Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains.
Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749 · Cited by 3,311
The relation between group cohesiveness and performance: An integration.
Mullen, B., & Copper, C. (1994) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.210 · Cited by 1,398
Aldag, R. J., & Fuller, S. R. (1993) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.113.3.533 · Cited by 306
Allocating scarce resources: A contingency model of distributive justice
Skitka, L. J., & Tetlock, P. E. (1992) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(92)90043-j · Cited by 265
Linguistic intergroup bias: Differential expectancies or in-group protection?
Maass, A., Milesi, A., Zabbini, S., & Stahlberg, D. (1995) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.1.116 · Cited by 175
Self-citationLeana, C. R. (1985) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920638501100102 · Cited by 163
The power motive as an influence on group decision making.
Fodor, E. M., & Smith, T. (1982) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.178 · Cited by 138
Cited by
Exercise, physical activity, and self-determination theory: A systematic review
Teixeira, P. J., Carraça, E. V., Markland, D., Silva, M. N., & Ryan, R. M. (2012) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-9-78 · Cited by 2,963
A Social Identity Theory of Leadership
Hogg, M. A. (2001) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1207/s15327957pspr0503_1 · Cited by 2,298
Rai, T. S., & Fiske, A. P. (2011) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/a0021867 · Cited by 887
The psychology of system justification and the palliative function of ideology
Jost, J., & Hunyady, O. (2003) · European Review of Social Psychology · doi:10.1080/10463280240000046 · Cited by 833
Motivation and dropout in female handballers: a 21-month prospective study
Sarrazin, P., Vallerand, R., Guillet, E., Pelletier, L., & Cury, F. (2002) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.98 · Cited by 616
Metadata
- Authors
- Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Biddle, S. J. H.
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Psychology
- Published
- 1998
- References
- 11
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Functional significance of psychological variables that are included in the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a Self-Determination Theory approach to the study of attitudes, subjective norms, perceptions of control and intentions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199805/06)28:3
- The paper
- Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Biddle, S. J. H. (1998). Functional significance of psychological variables that are included in the Theory of Planned Behaviour: a Self-Determination Theory approach to the study of attitudes, subjective norms, perceptions of control and intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1099-0992(199805/06)28%3A3
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
