Cited by 163Team Dynamics and PerformanceSocial and Intergroup PsychologyLeadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies

A Partial Test of Janis' Groupthink Model: Effects of Group Cohesiveness and Leader Behavior on Defective Decision Making

Leana, Carrie R.·1985·Journal of Management

Abstract

The effects of group cohesiveness and leader behavior on Janis' (1982) symptoms of defective decision making were investigated within a laboratory setting. Two-hundred-eight college students were divided into four-person groups to solve a hypothetical business problem during tape-recorded group discussion sessions. Results showed that members of noncohesive groups engaged in more self-censorship of information than did members of cohesive groups. Teams with directive leaders proposed and discussed fewer alternative solutions to the problem than did groups with leaders who encouraged member participation. Groups with directive leaders were also willing to comply with the leaders' proposed solutions when the leaders stated their preferences early in the group discussion. These results only partially support Janis' groupthink model.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/014920638501100102

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Leana, C. R.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Leana, Carrie R.
Venue
Journal of Management
Published
1985-04
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
5-18
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
OpenAlex
W2087972269
Cited by
163
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Leadership, Behavior, and Decision-Making Studies
Keywords
groupthink, group cohesion, leadership behavior, self-censorship, directive leadership, group decision making

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review