The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for low back pain
Open accessAbstract
BACKGROUND: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the most frequently prescribed medications worldwide and are widely used for patients with low-back pain. Selective COX-2 inhibitors are currently available and used for patients with low-back pain. OBJECTIVES: The objective was to assess the effects of NSAIDs and COX-2 inhibitors in the treatment of non-specific low-back pain and to assess which type of NSAID is most effective. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials up to and including June 2007 if reported in English, Dutch or German. We also screened references given in relevant reviews and identified trials. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials and double-blind controlled trials of NSAIDs in non-specific low-back pain with or without sciatica were included. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed methodological quality. All studies were also assessed on clinical relevance, from which no further interpretations or conclusions were drawn. If data were considered clinically homogeneous, a meta-analysis was performed. If data were lacking for clinically homogeneous trials, a qualitative analysis was performed using a rating system with four levels of evidence (strong, moderate, limited, no evidence). MAIN RESULTS: In total, 65 trials (total number of patients = 11,237) were included in this review. Twenty-eight trials (42%) were considered high quality. Statistically significant effects were found in favour of NSAIDs compared to placebo, but at the cost of statistically significant more side effects. There is moderate evidence that NSAIDs are not more effective than paracetamol for acute low-back pain, but paracetamol had fewer side effects. There is moderate evidence that NSAIDs are not more effective than other drugs for acute low-back pain. There is strong evidence that various types of NSAIDs, including COX-2 NSAIDs, are equally effective for acute low-back pain. COX-2 NSAIDs had statistically significantly fewer side-effects than traditional NSAIDs. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence from the 65 trials included in this review suggests that NSAIDs are effective for short-term symptomatic relief in patients with acute and chronic low-back pain without sciatica. However, effect sizes are small. Furthermore, there does not seem to be a specific type of NSAID which is clearly more effective than others. The selective COX-2 inhibitors showed fewer side effects compared to traditional NSAIDs in the RCTs included in this review. However, recent studies have shown that COX-2 inhibitors are associated with increased cardiovascular risks in specific patient populations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Improving the Quality of Reporting of Randomized Controlled Trials: The CONSORT Statement
Begg, C. (1996) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1996.03540080059030 · Cited by 3,127
Chapter 4 European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain
Airaksinen, O., Brox, J. I., Cedraschi, C., Hildebrandt, J., Klaber-Moffett, J., Kovacs, F., Mannion, A. F., Reis, S., Staal, J. B., Ursin, H., et al. (2006) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1 · Cited by 2,594
Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group
van Tulder, M., Furlan, A., Bombardier, C., & Bouter, L. (2003) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000065484.95996.af · Cited by 2,180
Cited by
Qaseem, A., Wilt, T. J., McLean, R. M., Forciea, M. A., & for the Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians* (2017) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/m16-2367 · Cited by 3,234
Chapter 4 European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain
Airaksinen, O., Brox, J. I., Cedraschi, C., Hildebrandt, J., Klaber-Moffett, J., Kovacs, F., Mannion, A. F., Reis, S., Staal, J. B., Ursin, H., et al. (2006) · European Spine Journal · doi:10.1007/s00586-006-1072-1 · Cited by 2,594
Maher, C., Underwood, M., & Buchbinder, R. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30970-9 · Cited by 2,535
Treatment of chronic non-cancer pain
Turk, D. C., Wilson, H. D., & Cahana, A. (2011) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(11)60402-9 · Cited by 716
Chou, R., & Huffman, L. H. (2007) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-147-7-200710020-00008 · Cited by 583
Management of functional somatic syndromes and bodily distress
Henningsen, P., Zipfel, S., Sattel, H., & Creed, F. (2018) · Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics · doi:10.1159/000484413 · Cited by 335
Efficacy of paracetamol for acute low-back pain: a double-blind, randomised controlled trial
Williams, C. M., Maher, C. G., Latimer, J., McLachlan, A. J., Hancock, M. J., Day, R. O., & Lin, C.-W. C. (2014) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(14)60805-9 · Cited by 325
Chenot, J.-F., Greitemann, B., Kladny, B., Petzke, F., Pfingsten, M., & Schorr, S. G. (2017) · Deutsches Ärzteblatt international · doi:10.3238/arztebl.2017.0883 · Cited by 282
Drugs for relief of pain in patients with sciatica: systematic review and meta-analysis
Pinto, R. Z., Maher, C. G., Ferreira, M. L., Ferreira, P. H., Hancock, M., Oliveira, V. C., McLachlan, A. J., & Koes, B. (2012) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.e497 · Cited by 213
Self-citationNon-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs for spinal pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Machado, G. C., Maher, C. G., Ferreira, P. H., Day, R. O., Pinheiro, M. B., & Ferreira, M. L. (2017) · Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases · doi:10.1136/annrheumdis-2016-210597 · Cited by 199
Comparative effectiveness of CBT interventions for co-morbid chronic pain & insomnia: A pilot study
Pigeon, W. R., Moynihan, J., Matteson-Rusby, S., Jungquist, C. R., Xia, Y., Tu, X., & Perlis, M. L. (2012) · Behaviour Research and Therapy · doi:10.1016/j.brat.2012.07.005 · Cited by 134
Prevention and management of chronic back pain
Weiner, S. S., & Nordin, M. (2010) · Best Practice & Research Clinical Rheumatology · doi:10.1016/j.berh.2009.12.001 · Cited by 119
Golob, A. L., & Wipf, J. E. (2014) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2014.01.003 · Cited by 109
Colle, F., Rannou, F., Revel, M., Fermanian, J., & Poiraudeau, S. (2002) · Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation · doi:10.1053/apmr.2002.35657 · Cited by 68
Garschagen, A., Steegers, M. A. H., van Bergen, A. H. M. M., Jochijms, J. A. M., Skrabanja, T. L. M., Vrijhoef, H. J. M., Smeets, R. J. E. M., & Vissers, K. C. P. (2015) · Pain Practice · doi:10.1111/papr.12234 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Roelofs, P. D., Deyo, R. A., Koes, B. W., Scholten, R. J., & van Tulder, M. W.
- Venue
- Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2008-01-23
- Volume
- 2011
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- CD000396-CD000396
- ISSN
- 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
- 1465-1858
- OpenAlex
- W1822035430
- Cited by
- 398
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.