Cited by 97Hip and Femur FracturesNutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology

Nutritional supplementation for hip fracture aftercare in older people

Avenell, Alison, Handoll, Helen HG·2010·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Older people with hip fractures are often malnourished at the time of fracture, and have poor food intake subsequently. OBJECTIVES: To review the effects of nutritional interventions in older people recovering from hip fracture. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register (September 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 3), MEDLINE and other major databases (to July 2008). SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of nutritional interventions for people aged over 65 years with hip fracture. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Both authors independently selected trials, extracted data and assessed trial quality. We pooled data for primary outcomes. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-four randomised trials involving 1940 participants were included. Outcome data were limited and many trials were methodologically flawed. Results from 23 trials are presented here.Ten trials evaluated oral multinutrient feeds: providing non-protein energy, protein, some vitamins and minerals. Oral feeds had no statistically significant effect on mortality (16/244 versus 21/226; risk ratio (RR) 0.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.42 to 1.37) or 'unfavourable outcome' (combined outcome of mortality and survivors with medical complications) (46/126 versus 41/103; RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.04).Four heterogenous trials examining nasogastric multinutrient feeding showed no evidence of an effect on mortality (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.97). Nasogastric feeding was poorly tolerated.One trial examining nasogastric tube feeding followed by oral feeds found no evidence for an effect on mortality or complications.One trial of multinutrient intravenous feeding followed by oral supplements found a reduction in participants with complications (RR 0.21, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.46), but not in mortality (RR 0.11, 95% CI 0.01 to 2.00).Four trials testing increasing protein intake in an oral feed found no evidence for an effect on mortality (RR 1.42, 95% CI 0.85 to 2.37). Protein supplementation may have reduced the number of long term medical complications.Two trials, testing intravenous vitamin B1 and other water soluble vitamins, or oral 1-alpha-hydroxycholecalciferol (vitamin D) respectively, produced no evidence of effect.One trial, evaluating dietetic assistants to help with feeding, showed no statistically significant effect on mortality (RR 0.57, 99% CI 0.29 to 1.11). AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Weak evidence exists for the effectiveness of protein and energy feeds. Adequately sized randomised trials with robust methodology are required. In particular, the role of dietetic assistants, and peripheral venous feeding require further evaluation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd001880.pub5

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Avenell, A., & Handoll, H. H.
Affiliations
  • University of Aberdeen (GB)
  • Teesside University (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Published
2010-01-20
Issue
1
Pages
CD001880-CD001880
ISSN
1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4241746263
Cited by
97
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 11 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
Type
reference entry
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
Keywords
hip fracture, dietary supplementation, older adults, malnutrition, nasogastric tube feeding, parenteral nutrition, protein supplementation, mortality, postoperative complications, dietary intervention, fracture recovery, dietary intake, vitamin and mineral supplementation, nursing homes, hospital readmission, length of hospital stay, quality of life
MeSH terms
Aftercare, Aged, Hip Fractures, Humans, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Nutritional Support, Dietary Supplements, Malnutrition

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review