Cited by 32Nutrition and Health in AgingClinical Nutrition and GastroenterologyHip and Femur Fractures

Lower limb fracture, cognitive impairment and risk of subsequent malnutrition: a prospective evaluation of dietary energy and protein intake on an orthopaedic ward

Miller, M D, Bannerman, E, Daniels, L A, Crotty, M·2006·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Objective To report the dietary energy and protein intake of undernourished older adults (with and without cognitive impairment) admitted to hospital following a lower limb fracture and to determine whether dietary intakes met estimated requirements. Design An observational study of a sequential sample. Setting The orthopaedic ward of a South Australian metropolitan teaching hospital. Subjects Sixty-eight patients aged > or =70 years screened as undernourished and admitted to hospital following lower limb fracture (50% cognitively impaired) provided 3 to 5 days of dietary data. MAJOR OUTCOME METHODS: Dietary energy and protein intake. Methods Dietary assessment using plate waste methodology and snack record charts commenced within 6 days postinjury and continued for up to five consecutive days or until discharge. Estimated resting energy requirements were calculated and adjusted for activity equivalent to bed rest and physiological stress. Protein requirements were calculated as 1 g/kg/day. Cognition was assessed using the Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire. Results Cognitively impaired participants and those without cognitive impairment consumed, mean (95% CI) respectively, 3661 kJ/day (3201, 4121) versus 4208 kJ/day (3798, 4619) and 38 g (33, 44) versus 47 g (41, 52) protein/day. Cognitively impaired participants consumed mean (95% CI) 48% (43, 53) of estimated total energy expenditure and 78% (69, 87) of estimated protein requirements. Conclusions Orthopaedic fracture patients at greatest nutritional risk, including those with cognitive impairment, do not achieve estimated energy or protein requirements from diet alone. Effective methods of achieving requirements in this vulnerable group are needed before improvements in outcomes will be observed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1602390

Cites

54 of 54 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 55 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, M. D., Bannerman, E., Daniels, L. A., & Crotty, M.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Crotty, M
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2006-02-01
Volume
60
Issue
7
Pages
853-861
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W1969653076
Cited by
32
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
1.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (acceptedVersion)
  • Flinders Academic Commons (Flinders University) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Margaret University Publications Repository (Queen Margaret University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • National Medical Research Council
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Nutrition and Health in Aging
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Clinical Nutrition and Gastroenterology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hip and Femur Fractures
Keywords
lower limb fractures, cognitive impairment, malnutrition, older adults, energy intake, protein intake, nutrient requirements, orthopedic ward, hospitalization, Short Portable Mental Status Questionnaire
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Energy Intake, Cognition Disorders, Dietary Proteins, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Male, Nutritional Requirements, Prospective Studies, Weight Loss, Nutrition Assessment, Fracture Healing, Malnutrition, Fractures, Bone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review