Cited by 77Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Relapse prevention interventions for smoking cessation

Open access
Livingstone-Banks, Jonathan, Norris, Emma, Hartmann-Boyce, Jamie, West, Robert, Jarvis, Martin, Chubb, Emma, Hajek, Peter·2019·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Relapse prevention interventions for smoking cessation (Review)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd003999.pub6

Cites

204 of 204 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [12]12. Coleman T, Agboola S, Leonardi- Bee J, Taylor M, McEwen A, McNeill A. Relapse prevention in UK Stop Smoking Services: current practice, systemat effectiveness analysis. Health Technology Assessment 2010;14(49):1-152.
  2. [16]16. Hajek P. Appraising the efficacy of psychological treatments for smokers. Journal of Smoking-Related Disorders 1994;5:101-7.
  3. [28]28. Marlatt A, Gordon J. Relapse Prevention. New York: Guilford Press, 1985.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Livingstone-Banks, J., Norris, E., Hartmann-Boyce, J., West, R., Jarvis, M., Chubb, E., & Hajek, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford; Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences; Oxford UK
  • University College London (GB)
  • Cancer Research UK (GB)
  • Cardiff University (GB)
  • Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London; Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine; 55 Philpot Street London UK E1 2HJ
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-10-28
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W4211088671
Cited by
77
References
192
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5
FWCI
1.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • Brunel University Research Archive (BURA) (Brunel University London) (submittedVersion)
  • Queen Mary Research Online (Queen Mary University of London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • University of Washington
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (16/114/20, SRP/16/114/20)
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • Evidence Synthesis Programme
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
relapse prevention, smoking cessation, smoking cessation interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review