CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 613Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentTemporomandibular Joint Disorders

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 264 of the 267 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Exercises for mechanical neck disorders

Open access
Gross, Anita, Kay, Theresa M, Paquin, Jean-Philippe, Blanchette, Samuel, Lalonde, Patrick, Christie, Trevor, Dupont, Genevieve, Graham, Nadine, Burnie, Stephen J, Gelley, Geoff, Goldsmith, Charles H, Forget, Mario, Hoving, Jan L, Brønfort, Gert, Santaguida, Pasqualina L, Cervical Overview Group·2015·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
DOI 10.1002/14651858.cd004250.pub5PMC PMC9508492
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Neck pain is common, disabling and costly. Exercise is one treatment approach. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness of exercises to improve pain, disability, function, patient satisfaction, quality of life and global perceived effect in adults with neck pain. SEARCH METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, MANTIS, ClinicalTrials.gov and three other computerized databases up to between January and May 2014 plus additional sources (reference checking, citation searching, contact with authors). SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing single therapeutic exercise with a control for adults suffering from neck pain with or without cervicogenic headache or radiculopathy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently conducted trial selection, data extraction, 'Risk of bias' assessment and clinical relevance. The quality of the evidence was assessed using GRADE. Meta-analyses were performed for relative risk and standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) after judging clinical and statistical heterogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: Twenty-seven trials (2485 analyzed /3005 randomized participants) met our inclusion criteria.For acute neck pain only, no evidence was found.For chronic neck pain, moderate quality evidence supports 1) cervico-scapulothoracic and upper extremity strength training to improve pain of a moderate to large amount immediately post treatment [pooled SMD (SMDp) -0.71 (95% CI: -1.33 to -0.10)] and at short-term follow-up; 2) scapulothoracic and upper extremity endurance training for slight beneficial effect on pain at immediate post treatment and short-term follow-up; 3) combined cervical, shoulder and scapulothoracic strengthening and stretching exercises varied from a small to large magnitude of beneficial effect on pain at immediate post treatment [SMDp -0.33 (95% CI: -0.55 to -0.10)] and up to long-term follow-up and a medium magnitude of effect improving function at both immediate post treatment and at short-term follow-up [SMDp -0.45 (95%CI: -0.72 to -0.18)]; 4) cervico-scapulothoracic strengthening/stabilization exercises to improve pain and function at intermediate term [SMDp -14.90 (95% CI:-22.40 to -7.39)]; 5) Mindfulness exercises (Qigong) minimally improved function but not global perceived effect at short term. Low evidence suggests 1) breathing exercises; 2) general fitness training; 3) stretching alone; and 4) feedback exercises combined with pattern synchronization may not change pain or function at immediate post treatment to short-term follow-up. Very low evidence suggests neuromuscular eye-neck co-ordination/proprioceptive exercises may improve pain and function at short-term follow-up.For chronic cervicogenic headache, moderate quality evidence supports static-dynamic cervico-scapulothoracic strengthening/endurance exercises including pressure biofeedback immediate post treatment and probably improves pain, function and global perceived effect at long-term follow-up. Low grade evidence supports sustained natural apophyseal glides (SNAG) exercises.For acute radiculopathy, low quality evidence suggests a small benefit for pain reduction at immediate post treatment with cervical stretch/strengthening/stabilization exercises. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: No high quality evidence was found, indicating that there is still uncertainty about the effectiveness of exercise for neck pain. Using specific strengthening exercises as a part of routine practice for chronic neck pain, cervicogenic headache and radiculopathy may be beneficial. Research showed the use of strengthening and endurance exercises for the cervico-scapulothoracic and shoulder may be beneficial in reducing pain and improving function. However, when only stretching exercises were used no beneficial effects may be expected. Future research should explore optimal dosage.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd004250.pub5

Cites

264 of 264 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

3 retracted

Show all 267 references

Research works printed but not linked: 33

  1. Allan, 2003, Stretching as an adjunct to chiropractic manipulation of chronic neck pain - before, after or not at all? A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial, European Journal of Chiropractic, 50, 41
  2. Bronfort G Evan R Nelson B. Aker PD Goldsmith CH Vernon H A randomized controlled clinical trial of spinal manipulation and exercise for chronic neck pain: A report on neck performance outcomes after 11 weeks and long-term effects on patient-rated outcomes Proceedings of the Scientific symposium, 1997 World Chiropractic Congress 1998 62 8
  3. Bronfort G Evans R Nelson B Aker PD Goldsmith CH Vernon H A randomized controlled clinical trial of rehabilitative exercise and spinal manipulation for chronic neck pain. Effects on neck pain and disability, functional health status, biomechanical neck dysfunction, and somato-visceral symptoms Proceedings of the 1998 International Conference of Spinal Manipulation 1998 67 70
  4. Bernaards, 2007, The effectiveness of a work style intervention and a lifestyle physical activity intervention on the recovery from neck and upper limb symptoms in computer workers, Pain, 132, 142, 10.1016/j.pain.2007.06.007 · DOI
  5. Brodin, 1985, Cervical pain and mobilization, Manual Medicine, 2, 18
  6. Cleland, 2010, Thoracic spine manipulation and exercise versus exercise alone in the management of mechanical neck pain: Preliminary analysis of a randomized clinical trial, Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 40, A23
  7. Escortell-Mayor, 2008, Randomised clinical trial for primary care patients with neck pain: manual therapy versus electrical stimulation, Aten Primaria, 40, 337
  8. Giebel, 1997, Die distorsion der halswirbelsaule: Fruhfunktionalle vs. ruhigstellende behandlung, Zentralblatt für Chirurgie, 122, 517
  9. Guzel, 2006, Efficacy of local anesthetic injection versus dry needling in myofascial pain syndrome treatment, Turkish Journal of Physical and Medical Rehabilitation, 52, 22
  10. Hoving, 2001, Manual therapy, physical therapy, or continued care by the general practitioner for patients with neck pain: long-term results from a pragmatic randomized trial, 59
  11. Jordan A Bendix T Nielsen H Hansen FR Host D Winkel A Intensive training, physiotherapy, or manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain. A prospective single-blind randomized clinical trial Proceedings of the 1996 International conference on spinal manipulation 1996
  12. Koes, 1991, The effectiveness of manual therapy, physiotherapy and continued treatment by general practitioner for chronic nonspecific back and neck complaints, Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 14, 498
  13. Koes, 1992a, Efficacy of manual therapy and physiotherapy for back and neck complaints (Thesis)
  14. Koes, 1992d, Randomized clinical trial of manual therapy and physiotherapy for persistent back and neck complaints, Manual Therapy in the Netherlands, 1, 7
  15. Bosmans, 2011, Is behavioral graded activity cost-effective in comparison with manual therapy for patients with subacute neck pain, Spine, 36, 1179, 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31820644ed · DOI
  16. Ragonese, 2009, A randomized trial comparing manual physical therapy to therapeutic exercises, to a combination of therapies, for the treatment of cervical radiculopathy, Orthopaedic Practice, 21, 71
  17. Ryan, 2001, Reducing pain and disability for for patients with chronic neck pain: A double-blind randomised controlled trial
  18. Wei, 2007, Preventative and curative effect of initiative motion on cervical headache, Zhongguo Zuzhi Gongcheng Yanjlu yu Linchuang Kangfu, 11, 8012
  19. Guerriero D Comparative effects of manipulation and physical therapy on motion in the cervical spine Proceedings of the International Conference on Spinal Manipulation 1991
  20. Gurumoorthy D Twomey LT Batalin NJ A prospective study of acute whiplash injury and its clinical management Internation Federation of Manipulation Therapy, 7th Scientific Conference November 2000 Abstract 78
  21. Reginiussen T Johnsen R Torstensen TA Efficiency of manual therapy on patients with cervicogenic headache. A randomized single blinded controlled trial Internation Federation of Manipulation Therapy, 7th Scientific Conference November 2000 Abstract 105
  22. Stokke O A randomized comparison of chiropractic and physiotherapy treatment of neck pain of functional (mechanical) origins: A controlled clinical trial Conference Proceedings of the Chiropractic Centennial Foundation 1995 372 3
  23. Cohen, 1988, Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioural Sciences
  24. Goldsmith, 1993, Criteria for clinically important changes in outcomes. Development, scoring and evaluation of rheumatoid arthritis patients and rial profiles, Journal of Rheumatology, 20, 561
  25. Gross, 2007, Conservative Management of Mechanical NeckDisorders: A Systematic Review, Journal of Rheumatology, 34, 1083
  26. Hall, 2005, Therapeutic Exercise: Moving Toward Function
  27. Higgins, 2008, Cochrane Handbookfor Systematic Reviews of Interventions 5.0.2
  28. Kendal, 1963, The Advanced Theory of Statistics: Distribution Theory
  29. Merskey H Bogduk N Classification of Chronic Pain: Descriptions of Chronic Pain Syndromes and Definition of Pain Terms, second edition International Association for the Study of Pain 1994
  30. Olesen, 1988, Classification and diagnostic criteria for headache disorders, cranial neuralgias and facial pain, Cephalgia, 8, 61
  31. Olesen, 1997, ICD-10 Guide for Headaches. Guide to the classification, diagnosis and assessment of headaches in accordance with the tenth revision of the International classification of diseases and related health problems and its application to neurology, Cephalalgia, 17 Suppl 19, 29
  32. Spitzer, 1987, Scientific approach to the assessment and managment of activity related spinal disorders, Spine, suppl 7, S1
  33. Gross, Conservative management of mechanical neck disorders: A meta-analysis, Online Journal of Current Clinical Trials, 5, Doc No 200-1

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Gross, A., Kay, T. M., Paquin, J.-P., Blanchette, S., Lalonde, P., Christie, T., Dupont, G., Graham, N., Burnie, S. J., Gelley, G., Goldsmith, C. H., Forget, M., Hoving, J. L., Brønfort, G., Santaguida, P. L., & Cervical Overview Group
Affiliations
  • McMaster University (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
  • Physio St-Maurice; Trois-Rivières QC Canada
  • Université Laval (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
  • Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College (CA)
  • University of Manitoba (CA)
  • Simon Fraser University (CA)
  • Department of National Defence (CA)
  • Amsterdam UMC Location University of Amsterdam (NL)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
ORCID
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2015-01-28
Volume
2015
Issue
1
Pages
CD004250-CD004250
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
DOI
10.1002/14651858.cd004250.pub5
PMC
PMC9508492
OpenAlex
W1575164208
Cited by
613
References
267
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 32 · 2023: 35 · 2022: 38 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 44 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 33
FWCI
6.02
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Monash University Research Portal (Monash University) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Dentistry › Oral Surgery › Temporomandibular Joint Disorders
Keywords
neck pain, exercise therapy, cervicogenic headache, radiculopathy, chronic neck pain, acute neck pain, resistance training, endurance training, stretching, qigong, pain intensity, disability, quality of life, patient satisfaction, global perceived effect, exercise adherence, cervical range of motion
MeSH terms
Adult, Female, Headache, Humans, Male, Neck, Radiculopathy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Neck Pain, Physical Therapy Modalities, Manipulation, Chiropractic, Chronic Pain, Pain Management, Acute Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review