Cited by 99Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationMyofascial pain diagnosis and treatmentPain Management and Treatment

The effects of pain neuroscience education and exercise on pain, muscle endurance, catastrophizing and anxiety in adolescents with chronic idiopathic neck pain: A school-based pilot, randomized and controlled study

Andias, Rosa, Neto, Maritza, Silva, Anabela G.·2018·Physiotherapy Theory and Practice

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the effectiveness of pain neuroscience education (PNE) and neck/shoulder exercises with no intervention in adolescents with chronic idiopathic neck pain (CINP). METHODS: Forty-three adolescents with CINP were randomly allocated to receive PNE and shoulder/neck exercises (n = 21) or no intervention (n = 22). Data on pain intensity, neck flexor and extensor muscles endurance, scapular stabilizers endurance, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, and knowledge of pain neurophysiology were collected. Measurements were taken before and after the intervention. RESULTS: All participants completed the study. Analysis using ANCOVA revealed a significant increase in the neck extensors endurance capacity (adjusted mean ± SE change = + 47.5 ± 13.5 s versus +14.2 ± 13.1 s) and knowledge of pain neurophysiology (adjusted mean ± SE change = + 9.8 ± 3.2 versus -0.6 ± 0.6) in the group receiving the intervention. A higher mean decrease in pain intensity, pain catastrophizing and anxiety and a higher mean increase in the scapular stabilizers endurance capacity were also found in the intervention group, but differences did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest a potential benefit of PNE and exercise for adolescents with CINP. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/09593985.2018.1423590

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The Andias et al. study had methodological shortcomings, including a small sample size (n = 43) and a control group that received no treatment or attention from therapists.

    “Yet, some methodological shortcomings were present in this study, such as the rather small sample size (n = 43) and the control group who did not receive any treatment (nor attention from the therapists).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Andias, R., Neto, M., & Silva, A. G.
Affiliations
  • University of Aveiro (PT)
  • Primary Healthcare Center, Ílhavo, Portugal
  • Centre for Health Technology and Services Research (PT)
Corresponding author
Silva, Anabela G.
Venue
Physiotherapy Theory and Practice
Published
2018-01-10
Volume
34
Issue
9
Pages
682-691
ISSN
  • 0959-3985 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5040
OpenAlex
W2784222969
Cited by
99
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2
FWCI
4.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Physiotherapy Theory and Practice (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Myofascial pain diagnosis and treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Treatment
Keywords
pain neuroscience education, adolescents, muscular endurance, pain catastrophizing, anxiety, pain intensity, scapular stabilizers, school-based intervention
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adolescent Behavior, Anxiety, Combined Modality Therapy, Exercise Therapy, Female, Humans, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Neck Muscles, Neurosciences, Patient Education as Topic, Physical Endurance, Portugal, School Health Services, Time Factors, Treatment Outcome, Exercise Tolerance, Neck Pain, Muscle Strength, Catastrophization, Chronic Pain

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review