Cited by 160Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of LifeHealthcare cost, quality, practices

Cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of non-specific neck pain and low back pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis

Open access
Miyamoto, Gisela Cristiane, Lin, Chung-Wei Christine, Cabral, Cristina Maria Nunes, van Dongen, Johanna M, van Tulder, Maurits W·2019·British Journal of Sports Medicine

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy in the treatment of patients with non-specific neck pain and low back pain. Design: Systematic review of economic evaluations. Data sources: The search was performed in 5 clinical and 3 economic electronic databases. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies: We included economic evaluations performed alongside randomised controlled trials. Differences in costs and effects were pooled in a meta-analysis, if possible, and incremental cost-utility ratios (ICUR) were descriptively analysed. Results: Twenty-two studies were included. On average, exercise therapy was associated with lower costs and larger effects for quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) in comparison with usual care for subacute and chronic low back pain from a healthcare perspective (based on ICUR). Exercise therapy had similar costs and effect for QALY in comparison with other interventions for neck pain from a societal perspective, and subacute and chronic low back pain from a healthcare perspective. There was limited or inconsistent evidence on the cost-effectiveness of exercise therapy compared with usual care for neck pain and acute low back pain, other interventions for acute low back pain and different types of exercise therapy for neck pain and low back pain. Conclusions: Exercise therapy seems to be cost-effective compared with usual care for subacute and chronic low back pain. Exercise therapy was not (more) cost-effective compared with other interventions for neck pain and low back pain. The cost-utility estimates are rather uncertain, indicating that more economic evaluations are needed. Registration: PROSPERO, CRD42017059025.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/bjsports-2017-098765

Cites

62 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 1 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A 2019 meta-analysis concluded that exercise is more cost-effective than usual medical care for subacute and chronic low back pain.

    “A meta-analysis published in 2019 concluded that exercise is more cost-effective compared to usual medical care for subacute and chronic low back pain [10].”

    From Prevention of non-specific back pain through exercise and education: A systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [10]

    The Abstract says exercise therapy may be cost-effective compared with usual care for subacute and chronic low back pain, but calls the cost-utility estimates uncertain. The ‘Subacute and chronic low back pain’ section reports mixed cost-utility results, including one finding that exercise was not cost-effective. The citing sentence overstates this qualified conclusion as a definitive one. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 65 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miyamoto, G. C., Lin, C.-W. C., Cabral, C. M. N., van Dongen, J. M., & van Tulder, M. W.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • The University of Sydney (AU)
  • Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam, Noord-Holland, The Netherlands
Corresponding author
Miyamoto, Gisela Cristiane
Venue
British Journal of Sports Medicine
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2018-04-20
Volume
53
Issue
3
Pages
172-181
ISSN
  • 0306-3674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1473-0480
OpenAlex
W2802922258
Cited by
155
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 5
FWCI
1.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • British Journal of Sports Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • VU Research Portal (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • HighWire Press Open Archive (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • National Health and Medical Research Council
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare cost, quality, practices
Keywords
exercise therapy, cost-effectiveness, non-specific neck pain, low back pain, chronic low back pain, subacute low back pain, acute low back pain, quality-adjusted life years, incremental cost-utility ratio, usual care comparison, economic evaluation
MeSH terms
Cost-Benefit Analysis, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Low Back Pain, Quality-Adjusted Life Years, Neck Pain, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review