Cited by 191Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation

Open access
Lindson, Nicola, Thompson, Tom P, Ferrey, Anne, Lambert, Jeffrey D, Aveyard, Paul·2019·Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Abstract

Does motivational interviewing help people to quit smoking? BackgroundMotivational interviewing is a type of counselling that can be used to help people to stop smoking.It aims to help people explore the reasons that they may feel unsure about quitting and find ways to make them feel more willing and able to stop smoking.Rather than telling the person why and how they should change their behaviour, counsellors try to help people to choose to change their own behaviour, increasing their confidence that they can succeed.This review explores whether motivational interviewing helps more people to stop smoking than no treatment, or other types of stop smoking treatment.It also looks at whether longer motivational interviewing, with more counselling sessions, helps more people to quit than shorter motivational interviewing with fewer sessions. Study characteristicsThis review included 37 trials covering over 15,000 people who smoked tobacco.Studies were conducted in a lot of different types of people, including people with health problems or drug use problems, young people, homeless people, and people who had been arrested or were in prison.Some people felt ready to quit smoking and others did not.Motivational interviewing was provided in one to 12 sessions and took from as little as five minutes, to as much as eight hours, to deliver.Studies lasted for at least six months.The evidence is up to date to August 2018. Key resultsThere was not enough information available to decide whether motivational interviewing helped more people to stop smoking than no stop smoking treatment.People were slightly more likely to stop smoking if they were provided with motivational interviewing rather than another type of treatment to stop smoking, but our findings suggest that there is still a chance that motivational interviewing could also reduce a person's chances of quitting compared with other stop smoking treatments.This means more research is needed to decide whether motivational interviewing can help more people to quit than other types of treatment.Using longer motivational interviewing with more treatment sessions may help more people to give up smoking than shorter motivational interviewing with fewer sessions, however more research is needed to be sure that this is the case.We also looked at whether being provided with motivational interviewing to quit smoking increased people's well-being.Most studies did not provide any information about this, and so more studies are needed to answer this question. Quality of the evidenceThere is low-quality evidence looking at whether motivational interviewing helps more people to quit smoking than no treatment.This means it is difficult to know whether motivational interviewing helps people to quit smoking or not, and more studies are needed.The quality of the evidence was also low for all of the other questions we asked about quitting smoking, which means that our findings may Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation (Review)

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/14651858.cd006936.pub4

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There was a lack of clear benefit of motivational interviewing, decision aids, real-time video counseling, print-based, nontailored self-help materials, biomedical risk assessment, exercise, acupuncture, hypnotherapy, and systems-level interventions compared with controls.

    “There was a lack of clear benefit of motivational interviewing,[37](#R37) decision aids,[46](#R46) real-time video counseling,[65](#R65) print-based, nontailored self-help materials,[40](#R40) biomedical risk assessment,[19](#R19) exercise,[66](#R66) acupuncture,[68](#R68) hypnotherapy,[13](#R13) and systems-level interventions[15](#R15),[61](#R61) compared with controls; however, there was subst”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Foxcro DR, Coombes L, Wood S, Allen D, Almeida Santimano NML, Moreira MT. Motivational interviewing for the prevention of alcohol misuse in young adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2016, Issue 7. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD007025.pub4] · DOI
  2. GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators 2016 GBD 2015 Risk Factors Collaborators. Global, regional, and national comparative risk assessment of 79 behavioural, environmental and occupational, and metabolic risks or clusters of risks, 1990-2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. Lancet 2016;388(10053):1659-724. [DOI: 10.1016/ S0140-6736(16)31679-8] · DOI · Paper page
  3. Heckman CJ, Egleston BL, Hofmann MT. Efficacy of motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tobacco Control 2010;19(5):410-6. [DOI: 10.1136/ tc.2009.033175] · DOI
  4. Hettema JE, Hendricks PS. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation: a meta-analytic review. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 2010;78(6):868-84. [PUBMED: 21114344]
  5. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 2003;7414:557-60.
  6. Jelsma JGM, Mertens V-C, Forsberg L, Forsberg L. How to measure motivational interviewing fidelity in randomized controlled trials: practical recommendations. Contemporary Clinical Trials 2015;43:93-9. [DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/ j.cct.2015.05.001] · DOI
  7. Jha P. Avoidable deaths from smoking: a global perspective. Public Health Reviews 2011;33(2):569-600.
  8. Lawendowski LA. A motivational intervention for adolescent smokers. Preventive Medicine 1998;5(3):A39-46.
  9. Markland D, Ryan RM, Tobin VJ, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing and self-determination theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology 2005;24(6):811-31.
  10. Mbuagbaw L, Ye C, Thabane L. Motivational interviewing for improving outcomes in youth living with HIV. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2012, Issue 9. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD009748.pub2] · DOI
  11. Miller WR. Motivational interviewing. III. On the ethics of motivational interviewing. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 1994;22(2):111-23.
  12. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Preparing People for Change. Guilford Press, 2002.
  13. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Ten things motivational interviewing is not. Behavioural and Cognitive Psychotherapy 2009;37:129-140.
  14. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change. 3rd Edition. New York: Guildford Press, 2013.
  15. Pierson HM, Hayes SC, Gifford EV, Roget N, Padilla M, Bissett R, et al. An examination of the motivational interviewing treatment integrity code. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 2007;32(1):11-7. [DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.jsat.2006.07.001] · DOI
  16. Rollnick S, Heather N, Bell A. Negotiating behaviour change in medical settings: the development of brief motivational interviewing. Journal of Mental Health 1992;1:25-37.
  17. Smedslund G, Berg RC, Hammerstrøm KT, Steiro A, Leiknes KA, Dahl HM, et al. Motivational interviewing for substance abuse. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 5. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008063.pub2] References to other published versions of this review Lai 2008 · DOI
  18. Lai DTC, Qin Y, Tang J-L. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006936] · DOI
  19. Lai DTC, Cahill K, Qin Y, Tang J-L. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2010, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006936.pub2; CD006936] · DOI
  20. Lindson-Hawley N, Thompson TP, Begh R. Motivational interviewing for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2015, Issue 3. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD006936.pub3] 1 All studies: cessation 19 5192 Risk Ratio (M-H, Random, 95% CI) 1.24 [0.91, 1.69] · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindson, N., Thompson, T. P., Ferrey, A., Lambert, J. D., & Aveyard, P.
Affiliations
  • University of Oxford (GB)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
Venue
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-07-31
Volume
2019
Issue
7
ISSN
  • 1361-6137 (ISSN-L)
  • 1465-1858
OpenAlex
W4210973137
Cited by
191
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 69 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
1.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PEARL (University of Plymouth) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Robert Wood Johnson Foundation
  • National Institute for Health and Care Research (NF-SI-0617-10064, 16/114/20, SRP/16/114/20)
  • Department of Health and Social Care
  • University College London
  • University of Wollongong
  • Illawarra Health and Medical Research Institute
  • National Institutes of Health (1r01ca193245-01a1, AI42853)
  • Center for AIDS Research, University of Washington
  • Evidence Synthesis Programme
  • NIHR Oxford Biomedical Research Centre
  • National Cancer Institute (P50CA084719)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI042853)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
motivational interviewing, smoking cessation, tobacco use, counseling intervention, treatment duration, well-being, homeless people, youth, prisoners

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review