Cited by 126Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesBehavioral Health and Interventions

Motivation and patch treatment for HIV+ smokers: a randomized controlled trial

Open access
Lloyd‐Richardson, Elizabeth E., Stanton, Cassandra A., Papandonatos, George D., Shadel, William G., Stein, Michael, Tashima, Karen, Flanigan, Timothy, Morrow, Kathleen +2 more·2009·Addiction

Abstract

Aims To test the efficacy of two smoking cessation interventions in a HIV positive (HIV+) sample: standard care (SC) treatment plus nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) versus more intensive motivationally enhanced (ME) treatment plus NRT. Design Randomized controlled trial. Setting HIV+ smoker referrals from eight immunology clinics in the northeastern United States. Participants A total of 444 participants enrolled in the study (mean age = 42.07 years; 63.28% male; 51.80% European American; mean cigarettes/day = 18.27). Interventions SC participants received two brief sessions with a health educator. Those setting a quit date received self‐help quitting materials and NRT. ME participants received four sessions of motivational counseling and a quit‐day counseling call. All ME intervention materials were tailored to the needs of HIV+ individuals. Measurements Biochemically verified 7‐day abstinence rates at 2‐month, 4‐month and 6‐month follow‐ups. Findings Intent‐to‐treat (ITT) abstinence rates at 2‐month, 4‐month and 6‐month follow‐ups were 12%, 9% and 9%, respectively, in the ME condition, and 13%, 10% and 10%, respectively, in the SC condition, indicating no between‐group differences. Among 412 participants with treatment utilization data, 6‐month ITT abstinence rates were associated positively with low nicotine dependence (P = 0.02), high motivation to quit (P = 0.04) and Hispanic American race/ethnicity (P = 0.02). Adjusting for these variables, each additional NRT contact improved the odds of smoking abstinence by a third (odds ratio = 1.32, 95% confidence interval = 0.99–1.75). Conclusions Motivationally enhanced treatment plus NRT did not improve cessation rates over and above standard care treatment plus NRT in this HIV+ sample of smokers. Providers offering brief support and encouraging use of nicotine replacement may be able to help HIV+ patients to quit smoking.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02623.x

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. [1]CDC HIV/AIDS Surveillance Report, Revised Edition 2007
  2. [35]Kohout FJ Berkman LF Evans DA Cornoni-Huntley J Two shorter forms of the CES-D (Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression) depression symptoms index J Aging Health 1993 5 179 193 10125443
  3. [36]Radloff LS The CES-D Scale: A self-report depressive scale for research in the general population Journal of Applied Psychological Measurement 1977 1 385 401
  4. [39]Shepard DS Neighbors CJ Lloyd-Richardson EE Beaston-Blaakman A Farrell N Niaura R Assessing costs and time of counseling services for HIV+ patients. XIV International AIDS Conference 2002 Barcelona, Spain Monduzzi Editore, International Proceedings Division (paper C708s9823)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lloyd‐Richardson, E. E., Stanton, C. A., Papandonatos, G. D., Shadel, W. G., Stein, M., Tashima, K., Flanigan, T., Morrow, K., Neighbors, C., & Niaura, R.
Affiliations
  • University of Massachusetts Dartmouth (US)
  • Brown University (US)
  • RAND Corporation (US)
  • National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (US)
Corresponding author
Lloyd‐Richardson, Elizabeth E.
Venue
Addiction
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-10-09
Volume
104
Issue
11
Pages
1891-1900
ISSN
  • 0965-2140 (ISSN-L)
  • 1360-0443
OpenAlex
W2066729021
Cited by
125
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 12
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Addiction (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K23HL069987)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01-DA12344-06, R01DA012344)
  • National Cancer Institute (K07CA095623, P50CA084719)
  • National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (P30AI042853)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
smoking cessation, nicotine replacement therapy, motivation enhancement, motivational counseling, nicotine dependence, abstinence rates, brief intervention, Hispanic Americans, race and ethnicity
MeSH terms
Administration, Cutaneous, Adult, Black or African American, Counseling, Female, Hispanic or Latino, HIV Seropositivity, Humans, Male, Motivation, New England, Nicotine, Smoking, Program Evaluation, Smoking Cessation, Treatment Outcome, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review