Nitrous oxide emissions from arable soils in Germany - an evaluation of six long-term field experiments.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Annual N losses by N2O from long-term field experiments with oilseed rape in Germany ranged between 1.4 and 4.0 kg N ha-1, of which 53 to 81% occurred during the winter season.
“Annual N losses by N2O from long-term field experiments with oilseed rape in Germany ranged between 1.4 and 4.0 kg N ha-1, of which 53 to 81% occurred during the winter season (Kaiser and Ruser, 2000).”
From Potential of Wheat Straw, Spruce Sawdust, and Lignin as High Organic Carbon Soil Amendments to Improve Agricultural Nitrogen Retention Capacity: An Incubation Study (2018) · cites this paper as Kaiser and Ruser, 2000
Remaining NO3- might be problematic in the winter season under field conditions, particularly in almost water-saturated soils after fertilization, after incorporation of crop residues, but also after weather-induced pulses of N mineralization.
“Nonetheless, remaining NO3- might be problematic in the winter season under field conditions (Kaiser and Ruser, 2000), particularly in almost water-saturated soils after fertilization, after incorporation of crop residues, but also after weather-induced pulses of N mineralization (Liang et al., 2016).”
From Potential of Wheat Straw, Spruce Sawdust, and Lignin as High Organic Carbon Soil Amendments to Improve Agricultural Nitrogen Retention Capacity: An Incubation Study (2018) · cites this paper as Kaiser and Ruser, 2000
The emission of N2O and the emission factor (N2O emission per applied N fertilizer) are crop-specific with up to a 700% difference between different crop types for the same site, fertilization rate and measurement period.
“The emission of N 2 O and also the emission factor (N 2 O emission per applied N fertil-izer) are crop-specific with up to a 700% difference between different crop types for the same site, fertilization rate and measurement period (Kaiser & Ruser, 2000).”
From Land‐use change to bioenergy production in <scp>E</scp> urope: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon (2012) · cites this paper as Kaiser & Ruser, 2000
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bioenergy and climate change mitigation: an assessment
Creutzig, F., Ravindranath, N. H., Berndes, G., Bolwig, S., Bright, R., Cherubini, F., Chum, H., Corbera, E., Delucchi, M., Faaij, A., et al. (2015) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/gcbb.12205 · Cited by 752 · see citing works
One Step Forward toward Characterization: Some Important Material Properties to Distinguish Biochars
Schimmelpfennig, S., & Glaser, B. (2012) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2011.0146 · Cited by 518 · see citing works
Walling, E., & Vaneeckhaute, C. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Management · doi:10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111211 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Don, A., Osborne, B., Hastings, A., Skiba, U., Carter, M. S., Drewer, J., Flessa, H., Freibauer, A., Hyvönen, N., Jones, M. B., et al. (2012) · GCB Bioenergy · doi:10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Reichel, R., Wei, J., Islam, M. S., Schmid, C., Wissel, H., Schröder, P., Schloter, M., & Brüggemann, N. (2018) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.00900 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Kim, E. J., Choi, S.-D., & Chang, Y.-S. (2011) · Environmental Science and Pollution Research · doi:10.1007/s11356-011-0515-3 · Cited by 70 · see citing works
Bundt, M., Krauss, M., Blaser, P., & Wilcke, W. (2001) · Journal of Environmental Quality · doi:10.2134/jeq2001.3041296x · Cited by 45 · see citing works
- Authors
- Kaiser, E.-A., & Ruser, R.
- Venue
- Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
- Published
- 2000
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
