Cited by 70Toxic Organic Pollutants ImpactFire effects on ecosystemsEnvironmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies

Levels and patterns of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils after forest fires in South Korea.

Kim, Eun Jung, Choi, Sung-Deuk, Chang, Yoon-Seok·2011·Environmental Science and Pollution Research

Abstract

Introduction To investigate the influence of biomass burning on the levels of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in soils, temporal trends and profiles of 16 US Environmental Protection Agency priority PAHs were studied in soil and ash samples collected 1, 5, and 9 months after forest fires in South Korea.Results and discussion The levels of PAHs in the burnt soils 1 month after the forest fires (mean, 1,200 ng/g dry weight) were comparable with those of contaminated urban soils. However, 5 and 9 months after the forest fires, these levels decreased considerably to those of general forest soils (206 and 302 ng/g, respectively). The burnt soils and ash were characterized by higher levels of light PAHs with two to four rings, reflecting direct emissions from biomass burning. Five and 9 months after the forest fires, the presence of naphthalene decreased considerably, which indicates that light PAHs were rapidly volatilized or degraded from the burnt soils.Conclusion The temporal trend and pattern of PAHs clearly suggests that soils in the forest-fire region can be contaminated by PAHs directly emitted from biomass burning. However, the fire-affected soils can return to the pre-fire conditions over time through the washout and wind dissipation of the ash with high content of PAHs as well as vaporization or degradation of light PAHs.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s11356-011-0515-3

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kim, E. J., Choi, S.-D., & Chang, Y.-S.
Affiliations
  • Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology (KR)
  • Pohang University of Science and Technology (KR)
Corresponding author
Choi, Sung-Deuk
Venue
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
Published
2011-05-07
Volume
18
Issue
9
Pages
1508-1517
ISSN
  • 0944-1344 (ISSN-L)
  • 1614-7499
OpenAlex
W1987057795
Cited by
70
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Environmental Science and Pollution Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Open Access System for Information Sharing (Pohang University of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
  • Scholarworks@UNIST (Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis › Toxic Organic Pollutants Impact
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Environmental and Analytical Chemistry Studies
Keywords
polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, forest fires, biomass burning, soil contamination, ash deposition, temporal trends, naphthalene, PAH degradation, South Korea
MeSH terms
Biodegradation, Environmental, Environmental Pollution, Fires, Naphthalenes, Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons, Soil, Soil Pollutants, Trees, United States, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Biomass, Republic of Korea

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review