Cited by 16Bone Tumor Diagnosis and TreatmentsSarcoma Diagnosis and TreatmentCancer Genomics and Diagnostics

Circulating tumour DNA is a promising biomarker for risk stratification of central chondrosarcoma with IDH1/2 and GNAS mutations

Open access
Lyskjær, Iben, Davies, Christopher, Strobl, Anna‐Christina, Hindley, Joanna, James, Steven, Lalam, Radhesh K., Cross, William, Hide, Geoff +8 more·2021·Molecular Oncology

Abstract

Chondrosarcoma (CS) is a rare tumour type and the most common primary malignant bone cancer in adults. The prognosis, currently based on tumour grade, imaging and anatomical location, is not reliable, and more objective biomarkers are required. We aimed to determine whether the level of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in the blood of CS patients could be used to predict outcome. In this multi-institutional study, we recruited 145 patients with cartilaginous tumours, of which 41 were excluded. ctDNA levels were assessed in 83 of the remaining 104 patients, whose tumours harboured a hotspot mutation in IDH1/2 or GNAS. ctDNA was detected pre-operatively in 31/83 (37%) and in 12/31 (39%) patients postoperatively. We found that detection of ctDNA was more accurate than pathology for identification of high-grade tumours and was associated with a poor prognosis; ctDNA was never associated with CS grade 1/atypical cartilaginous tumours (ACT) in the long bones, in neoplasms sited in the small bones of the hands and feet or in tumours measuring less than 80 mm. Although the results are promising, they are based on a small number of patients, and therefore, introduction of this blood test into clinical practice as a complementary assay to current standard-of-care protocols would allow the assay to be assessed more stringently and developed for a more personalised approach for the treatment of patients with CS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/1878-0261.13102

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [2]The WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board (2020) The WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO Classification of Tumours: Soft Tissue and Bone Tumours. IARC Press, Lyon.
  2. [10]Evans HL, Ayala AG & Romsdahl MM (1977) Prognostic factors in chondrosarcoma of bone. A clinicopathologic analysis with emphasis on histologic grading. Cancer 40, 818– 831. 890662

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lyskjær, I., Davies, C., Strobl, A., Hindley, J., James, S., Lalam, R. K., Cross, W., Hide, G., Rankin, K. S., Jeys, L., Tirabosco, R., Stevenson, J., Genomics England Research Consortium, O’Donnell, P., Cool, P., & Flanagan, A. M.
Affiliations
  • University College London (GB)
  • Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital (GB)
  • Royal Orthopaedic Hospital (GB)
  • Freeman Hospital (GB)
  • Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Flanagan, Adrienne M.
Venue
Molecular Oncology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-09-30
Volume
15
Issue
12
Pages
3679-3690
ISSN
  • 1574-7891 (ISSN-L)
  • 1878-0261
OpenAlex
W3200307827
Cited by
16
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2
FWCI
1.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Molecular Oncology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • WestminsterResearch (University of Westminster) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Keele Research Repository (Keele University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • UCLH Biomedical Research Centre
  • Lundbeckfonden (R303‐2018‐3018)
  • National Institute for Health Research
  • Bone Cancer Research Trust
  • Sarcoma UK (SUKG01.2018)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Keywords
central chondrosarcoma, circulating tumor DNA, liquid biopsy, IDH1 mutation, IDH2 mutation, GNAS mutation, risk stratification, prognosis, tumor grade, bone tumors, blood-based biomarkers
MeSH terms
Circulating Tumor DNA, Adult, Chondrosarcoma, Chromogranins, Humans, Isocitrate Dehydrogenase, Mutation, Biomarkers, Tumor, Risk Assessment, GTP-Binding Protein alpha Subunits, Gs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review