Cited by 36Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsFire effects on ecosystemsAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Weekly cycles of global fires—Associations with religion, wealth and culture, and insights into anthropogenic influences on global climate

Open access
Earl, Nick, Simmonds, Ian, Tapper, Nigel·2015·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

One approach to quantifying anthropogenic influences on the environment and the consequences of those is to examine weekly cycles (WCs). No long‐term natural process occurs on a WC so any such signal can be considered anthropogenic. There is much ongoing scientific debate as to whether regional‐scale WCs exist above the statistical noise level, with most significant studies claiming that anthropogenic aerosols and their interaction with solar radiation and clouds (direct/indirect effect) is the controlling factor. A major source of anthropogenic aerosol, underrepresented in the literature, is active fire (AF) from anthropogenic burning for land clearance/management. WCs in AF have not been analyzed heretofore, and these can provide a mechanism for observed regional‐scale WCs in several meteorological variables. We show that WCs in AFs are highly pronounced for many parts of the world, strongly influenced by the working week and particularly the day(s) of rest, associated with religious practices.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/2015gl066383

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A similar cultural signal has been shown globally, with fewer wildfires on Sundays than on other weekdays.

    “A similar cultural mark has also been demonstrated globally with a marked decline in wildfires on Sunday compared with other weekdays (41).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Earl, N., Simmonds, I. & Tapper, N. (2015). Weekly cycles of global fires-Associations with religion, wealth and culture, and insights into anthropogenic influences on global climate. GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 42 (21), pp.9579-9589. https:// doi.org/10.1002/2015GL066383. Persistent Link: http://hdl.handle.net/11343/116465

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Earl, N., Simmonds, I., & Tapper, N.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Earl, Nick
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2015-11-14
Volume
42
Issue
21
Pages
9579-9589
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2263207195
Cited by
36
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council (DP130103562)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Fire effects on ecosystems
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
weekly cycle, anthropogenic aerosols, anthropogenic climate influence, fire hotspots, land clearing, religious practice, working week, solar radiation, cloud interaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review