The DOI matches its Crossref record; 24 of the 24 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
MIDAS robust trend estimator for accurate GPS station velocities without step detection
Open accessAbstract
Automatic estimation of velocities from GPS coordinate time series is becoming required to cope with the exponentially increasing flood of available data, but problems detectable to the human eye are often overlooked. This motivates us to find an automatic and accurate estimator of trend that is resistant to common problems such as step discontinuities, outliers, seasonality, skewness, and heteroscedasticity. Developed here, Median Interannual Difference Adjusted for Skewness (MIDAS) is a variant of the Theil‐Sen median trend estimator, for which the ordinary version is the median of slopes v ij = ( x j –x i )/( t j –t i ) computed between all data pairs i > j . For normally distributed data, Theil‐Sen and least squares trend estimates are statistically identical, but unlike least squares, Theil‐Sen is resistant to undetected data problems. To mitigate both seasonality and step discontinuities, MIDAS selects data pairs separated by 1 year. This condition is relaxed for time series with gaps so that all data are used. Slopes from data pairs spanning a step function produce one‐sided outliers that can bias the median. To reduce bias, MIDAS removes outliers and recomputes the median. MIDAS also computes a robust and realistic estimate of trend uncertainty. Statistical tests using GPS data in the rigid North American plate interior show ±0.23 mm/yr root‐mean‐square (RMS) accuracy in horizontal velocity. In blind tests using synthetic data, MIDAS velocities have an RMS accuracy of ±0.33 mm/yr horizontal, ±1.1 mm/yr up, with a 5th percentile range smaller than all 20 automatic estimators tested. Considering its general nature, MIDAS has the potential for broader application in the geosciences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimates of the Regression Coefficient Based on Kendall's Tau
Sen, P. K. (1968) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934 · Cited by 14,517
Brazos River bar [Texas]; a study in the significance of grain size parameters
Folk, R. L., & Ward, W. C. (1957) · Journal of Sedimentary Research · doi:10.1306/74d70646-2b21-11d7-8648000102c1865d · Cited by 7,332
Leys, C., Ley, C., Klein, O., Bernard, P., & Licata, L. (2013) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2013.03.013 · Cited by 4,147 · cited 1×
“This requires an estimate of the standard deviation of the distribution that is not sensitive to outliers [Leys et al., 2013].”
BackgroundTechniques of trend analysis for monthly water quality data
Hirsch, R. M., Slack, J. R., & Smith, R. A. (1982) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/wr018i001p00107 · Cited by 2,934
Statistical Methods in Water Resources
(1992) · Studies in Environmental Science · doi:10.1016/s0166-1116(08)x7035-9 · Cited by 2,893
A Rank-Invariant Method of Linear and Polynomial Regression Analysis
Theil, H. (1992) · Advanced Studies in Theoretical and Applied Econometrics · doi:10.1007/978-94-011-2546-8_20 · Cited by 2,517
Introduction to Robust Estimation and Hypothesis Testing
(2012) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2010-0-67044-1 · Cited by 2,055
On the meaning and use of kurtosis.
DeCarlo, L. T. (1997) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037//1082-989x.2.3.292 · Cited by 1,755
A geodetic plate motion and Global Strain Rate Model
Kreemer, C., Blewitt, G., & Klein, E. C. (2014) · Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems · doi:10.1002/2014gc005407 · Cited by 1,013
Self-citationError analysis of continuous GPS position time series
Williams, S. D. P., Bock, Y., Fang, P., Jamason, P., Nikolaidis, R. M., Prawirodirdjo, L., Miller, M., & Johnson, D. J. (2004) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2003jb002741 · Cited by 734
Cited by
Sea Level, Tidal, and River Flow Trends in the Lower Columbia River Estuary, 1853–present
Talke, S. A., Mahedy, A., Jay, D. A., Lau, P., Hilley, C., & Hudson, A. (2020) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Oceans · doi:10.1029/2019jc015656 · Cited by 50
Ojo, A. O., Kao, H., Jiang, Y., Craymer, M., & Henton, J. (2021) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2020jb020529 · Cited by 17
Metadata
- Authors
- Blewitt, G., Kreemer, C., Hammond, W. C., & Gazeaux, J.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2016-03
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 2054-2068
- ISSN
- 2169-9313 (ISSN-L)
- 2169-9356
- OpenAlex
- W2264193409
- Cited by
- 361
- References
- 24
- FWCI
- 36.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: MIDAS robust trend estimator for accurate GPS station velocities without step detection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/2015jb012552
- The paper
- Blewitt, G., Kreemer, C., Hammond, W. C., & Gazeaux, J. (2016). MIDAS robust trend estimator for accurate GPS station velocities without step detection. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015jb012552
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.