The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Strain Accumulation and Release Rate in Canada: Implications for Long‐Term Crustal Deformation and Earthquake Hazards
Published version of a preprint
Abstract
To advance the understanding of crustal deformation and earthquake hazards in Canada, we analyze seismic and geodetic data sets and robustly estimate the crust strain accumulation and release rate by earthquakes. We find that less than 20% of the accumulated strain is released by earthquakes across the study area providing evidence for large‐scale aseismic deformation. We attribute this to glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) in eastern Canada, where predictions from the GIA model account for most of the observed discrepancy between the seismic and the geodetic moment rates. In western Canada, only a small percentage (<20%) of the discrepancy can be attributed to GIA‐related deformation. We suspect that this may reflect the inaccuracy of the GIA model to account for heterogeneity in Earth structure or indicate that the present‐day effect of GIA in western Canada is limited due to the fast response of the upper mantle to the deglaciation of the Cordillera Ice Sheet. At locations of previously identified seismic source zones, we speculate that the unreleased strain is been stored cumulatively in the crust and will be released as earthquakes in the future. The Gutenberg‐Richter model predicts, however, that the recurrence interval can vary significantly in Canada, ranging from decades near plate boundary zones in the west to thousands of years in the stable continental interior. Our attempt to quantify the GIA‐induced deformation provides the necessary first step for the integration of geodetic strain rates in seismic hazard analysis in Canada.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Seismic hazard studies and risk assessment of ongoing fault activity in intraplate regions are low compared to high-strain regions characterized by more frequent and higher magnitude earthquakes.
“Seismic hazard studies and risk assessment of ongoing fault activity in intraplate regions are low compared to high-strain regions characterized by more frequent and higher magnitude earthquakes”
From Tectonic geomorphology of the Ottawa-Bonnechere Graben, Eastern Canada: implications for regional uplift and intraplate seismicity (2023) · cites this paper as Ojo et al. 2021
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 134
- Adams J., 2003, Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: Values for over 650 Canadian localities intended for the 2005 Building Code of Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, Open File, 4459, 155
- Aki K., 1965, Maximum likelihood estimation of b in the formula log N = a − bM and its confidence limits, Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, Tokyo University, 43, 237
- 10.1007/s00190-016-0987-5 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/gji/ggx136 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04562.x · DOI
- 10.1785/0220130180 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019GL082406 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev-earth-060614-105302 · DOI
- 10.1002/2015JB012453 · DOI
- 10.1029/2009JB006637 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00190-010-0371-9 · DOI
- 10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530 · DOI
- 10.1785/0120150058 · DOI
- 10.1785/gssrl.81.2.184 · DOI
- 10.1029/2018EO104623 · DOI
- 10.1002/2015JB012552 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jog.2013.08.004 · DOI
- 10.1029/2001JB000570 · DOI
- 10.1130/g36710.1 · DOI
- 10.1029/2005JB004253 · DOI
- Carafa M. M., 2017, Assessing the seismic coupling of shallow continental faults and its impact on seismic hazard estimates: A case‐study from Italy, Geophysical Journal International, 209, 32
- Cassidy J. F., 1993, Source parameters of the 29 May and 5 June, 1940, Richardson Mountains, Yukon Territory, earthquakes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 83, 636
- Cassidy J. F., 2010, Canada's earthquakes: The good, the bad, and the ugly, Geoscience Canada, 37, 1
- 10.1785/0120060102 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tecto.2018.09.015 · DOI
- 10.1038/s41467-019-09804-8 · DOI
- 10.1029/97GL01042 · DOI
- 10.1785/0220150268 · DOI
- 10.1002/2014GL059230 · DOI
- 10.1093/gji/ggt085 · DOI
- 10.1785/0220180308 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1571-0866(04)80209-4 · DOI
- 10.1029/2009JB007139 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.278.5338.647 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019JB018837 · DOI
- 10.1785/gssrl.83.1.179 · DOI
- Fereidoni A., 2015, Composite Alberta Seismicity Catalog: CASC2014‐x
- 10.1785/BSSA0890030559 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017GC006838 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00024-011-0404-1 · DOI
- 10.1002/2016GL070042 · DOI
- 10.1785/0220170133 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00024-016-1270-7 · DOI
- 10.1029/2005JB004059 · DOI
- 10.1130/b25819.1 · DOI
- 10.1785/BSSA0340040185 · DOI
- 10.4095/297378 · DOI
- 10.1029/JB084iB05p02348 · DOI
- Henton J. A., 2006, Crustal motion and deformation monitoring of the Canadian landmass, Geomatica, 60, 173
- 10.1038/s41467-018-03739-2 · DOI
- Hyndman R. D., 2003, Frequency of large crustal earthquakes in Puget Sound–Southern Georgia Strait predicted from geodetic and geological deformation rates, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108
- 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1983.tb02804.x · DOI
- 10.1016/s0277-3791(00)00076-7 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2004.02261.x · DOI
- 10.1007/s000240050277 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01671.x · DOI
- 10.1785/0120120110 · DOI
- 10.1002/2013JB010535 · DOI
- 10.1029/2018GL079288 · DOI
- 10.1093/gji/ggv207 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10712-010-9100-4 · DOI
- Kostrov B. V., 1974, Seismic moment and energy of earthquakes, and seismic flow of rock, Earth Physics, 1, 23
- 10.1002/2014GC005407 · DOI
- 10.1029/2017JB015257 · DOI
- 10.1029/1999JB900356 · DOI
- Kreemer C. Holt W. E. &Haines A. J.(2002).The global moment rate distribution within plate boundary zones. InS.Stein&J. T.Freymueller(Eds.) Plate boundary zones(pp.173–190).Washington DC:American Geophysical Union. · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.01.046 · DOI
- 10.1029/2000GL012611 · DOI
- 10.4095/210902 · DOI
- Lamothe P., 2010, A crustal deformation study of the Charlevoix seismic zone in Quebec, Geomatica, 64, 61
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.032 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.03.015 · DOI
- 10.1139/e02-046 · DOI
- 10.1029/2018JB015620 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2004.02465.x · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.09.038 · DOI
- 10.1029/2003GL017586 · DOI
- 10.1029/2004JB003590 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/2011GL049846 · DOI
- 10.1130/l65.1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1029/2012JB009473 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.tecto.2018.01.011 · DOI
- 10.1093/gji/ggx446 · DOI
- 10.1785/0120100223 · DOI
- 10.5078/corssa-00180805 · DOI
- 10.1038/35059054 · DOI
- 10.1785/0220170063 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pepi.2018.09.005 · DOI
- 10.1785/0220150059 · DOI
- 10.1093/gji/ggx524 · DOI
- 10.1785/0120040166 · DOI
- 10.1029/2001GL013782 · DOI
- 10.1126/science.265.5169.195 · DOI
- 10.1002/jqs.713 · DOI
- 10.1002/2014JB011176 · DOI
- 10.1002/2016JB013844 · DOI
- 10.3133/ofr20161035 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017JB014930 · DOI
- Reid H. F., 1910, The California earthquake of April 18, 1906. Volume II. The mechanics of the earthquake
- Riddihough R. P.&Hyndman R. D.(1991).Modern plate tectonic regime of the continental margin of Western Canada. InH.Gabrielse&C. J.Yorath(Eds.) Geology of the Cordilleran Orogen in Canada. Geology Survey Canada Geology of Canada No. 4 (also Geological Society American The Geology of North America V. G2). · DOI
- 10.1016/j.pepi.2012.07.005 · DOI
- Ristau J. P., 2004, Seismotectonics of western Canada from regional moment tensor analysis
- 10.1785/0120050028 · DOI
- 10.1785/0120130287 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.jog.2010.04.008 · DOI
- 10.1093/gji/ggx156 · DOI
- 10.1785/BSSA0870051345 · DOI
- 10.1029/2006GL027081 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934 · DOI
- 10.1785/0120140247 · DOI
- 10.1093/gji/ggw103 · DOI
- 10.1002/2016JB012884 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.11.058 · DOI
- Stern V. H., 2013, Alberta earthquake catalogue, version 1.0: September 2006 through December 2010, Alberta Geological Survey Open File Report, 2013
- 10.1029/2018JB017050 · DOI
- 10.1029/2017JB015417 · DOI · Paper page
- Theil H., 1950, A rank‐invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis, Indagationes Mathematicae, 12, 85
- 10.1007/s00024-011-0420-1 · DOI
- 10.1029/90JB01583 · DOI
- 10.1139/e09-044 · DOI
- 10.4095/306292 · DOI
- 10.1029/94GL02840 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03147.x · DOI
- 10.1029/2001JB001227 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00556.x · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.t01-2-00658.x · DOI
- 10.1785/BSSA0700041337 · DOI
- 10.1130/1052-5173(2004)014<4:WATECW>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
- 10.1002/2013eo450001 · DOI
- 10.1785/0119990114 · DOI
- 10.1029/2018JB016352 · DOI
- 10.1029/2019JB018248 · DOI
- 10.1002/2017GL075967 · DOI
- 10.1029/96JB03860 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Gusti, U. K., Peace, A. L., & Rimando, J. (2023) · Canadian Journal of Earth Sciences · doi:10.1139/cjes-2022-0137 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- Ojo, A. O., Kao, H., Jiang, Y., Craymer, M., & Henton, J.
- Affiliations
- Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada Sidney BC Canada
- Canadian Geodetic Survey Surveyor General Branch Natural Resources Canada Sidney BC Canada
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2021-04
- Volume
- 126
- Issue
- 4
- ISSN
- 2169-9313
- 2169-9356
- Cited by
- 17
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
- Funders
- Natural Resources Canada
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review