Cited by 17

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Strain Accumulation and Release Rate in Canada: Implications for Long‐Term Crustal Deformation and Earthquake Hazards

Ojo, Adebayo Oluwaseun, Kao, Honn, Jiang, Yan, Craymer, Michael, Henton, Joseph·2021·Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

To advance the understanding of crustal deformation and earthquake hazards in Canada, we analyze seismic and geodetic data sets and robustly estimate the crust strain accumulation and release rate by earthquakes. We find that less than 20% of the accumulated strain is released by earthquakes across the study area providing evidence for large‐scale aseismic deformation. We attribute this to glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA) in eastern Canada, where predictions from the GIA model account for most of the observed discrepancy between the seismic and the geodetic moment rates. In western Canada, only a small percentage (<20%) of the discrepancy can be attributed to GIA‐related deformation. We suspect that this may reflect the inaccuracy of the GIA model to account for heterogeneity in Earth structure or indicate that the present‐day effect of GIA in western Canada is limited due to the fast response of the upper mantle to the deglaciation of the Cordillera Ice Sheet. At locations of previously identified seismic source zones, we speculate that the unreleased strain is been stored cumulatively in the crust and will be released as earthquakes in the future. The Gutenberg‐Richter model predicts, however, that the recurrence interval can vary significantly in Canada, ranging from decades near plate boundary zones in the west to thousands of years in the stable continental interior. Our attempt to quantify the GIA‐induced deformation provides the necessary first step for the integration of geodetic strain rates in seismic hazard analysis in Canada.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1029/2020jb020529

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 134

  1. Adams J., 2003, Fourth generation seismic hazard maps of Canada: Values for over 650 Canadian localities intended for the 2005 Building Code of Canada, Geological Survey of Canada, Open File, 4459, 155
  2. Aki K., 1965, Maximum likelihood estimation of b in the formula log N = a − bM and its confidence limits, Bulletin of the Earthquake Research Institute, Tokyo University, 43, 237
  3. 10.1007/s00190-016-0987-5 · DOI · Paper page
  4. 10.1093/gji/ggx136 · DOI
  5. 10.1111/j.1365-246X.2010.04562.x · DOI
  6. 10.1785/0220130180 · DOI
  7. 10.1029/2019GL082406 · DOI
  8. 10.1146/annurev-earth-060614-105302 · DOI
  9. 10.1002/2015JB012453 · DOI
  10. 10.1029/2009JB006637 · DOI
  11. 10.1007/s00190-010-0371-9 · DOI
  12. 10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530 · DOI
  13. 10.1785/0120150058 · DOI
  14. 10.1785/gssrl.81.2.184 · DOI
  15. 10.1029/2018EO104623 · DOI
  16. 10.1002/2015JB012552 · DOI
  17. 10.1016/j.jog.2013.08.004 · DOI
  18. 10.1029/2001JB000570 · DOI
  19. 10.1130/g36710.1 · DOI
  20. 10.1029/2005JB004253 · DOI
  21. Carafa M. M., 2017, Assessing the seismic coupling of shallow continental faults and its impact on seismic hazard estimates: A case‐study from Italy, Geophysical Journal International, 209, 32
  22. Cassidy J. F., 1993, Source parameters of the 29 May and 5 June, 1940, Richardson Mountains, Yukon Territory, earthquakes, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 83, 636
  23. Cassidy J. F., 2010, Canada's earthquakes: The good, the bad, and the ugly, Geoscience Canada, 37, 1
  24. 10.1785/0120060102 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/j.tecto.2018.09.015 · DOI
  26. 10.1038/s41467-019-09804-8 · DOI
  27. 10.1029/97GL01042 · DOI
  28. 10.1785/0220150268 · DOI
  29. 10.1002/2014GL059230 · DOI
  30. 10.1093/gji/ggt085 · DOI
  31. 10.1785/0220180308 · DOI
  32. 10.1016/S1571-0866(04)80209-4 · DOI
  33. 10.1029/2009JB007139 · DOI
  34. 10.1126/science.278.5338.647 · DOI
  35. 10.1029/2019JB018837 · DOI
  36. 10.1785/gssrl.83.1.179 · DOI
  37. Fereidoni A., 2015, Composite Alberta Seismicity Catalog: CASC2014‐x
  38. 10.1785/BSSA0890030559 · DOI
  39. 10.1002/2017GC006838 · DOI
  40. 10.1007/s00024-011-0404-1 · DOI
  41. 10.1002/2016GL070042 · DOI
  42. 10.1785/0220170133 · DOI
  43. 10.1007/s00024-016-1270-7 · DOI
  44. 10.1029/2005JB004059 · DOI
  45. 10.1130/b25819.1 · DOI
  46. 10.1785/BSSA0340040185 · DOI
  47. 10.4095/297378 · DOI
  48. 10.1029/JB084iB05p02348 · DOI
  49. Henton J. A., 2006, Crustal motion and deformation monitoring of the Canadian landmass, Geomatica, 60, 173
  50. 10.1038/s41467-018-03739-2 · DOI
  51. Hyndman R. D., 2003, Frequency of large crustal earthquakes in Puget Sound–Southern Georgia Strait predicted from geodetic and geological deformation rates, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 108
  52. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1983.tb02804.x · DOI
  53. 10.1016/s0277-3791(00)00076-7 · DOI
  54. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2004.02261.x · DOI
  55. 10.1007/s000240050277 · DOI
  56. 10.1046/j.1365-246x.2002.01671.x · DOI
  57. 10.1785/0120120110 · DOI
  58. 10.1002/2013JB010535 · DOI
  59. 10.1029/2018GL079288 · DOI
  60. 10.1093/gji/ggv207 · DOI
  61. 10.1007/s10712-010-9100-4 · DOI
  62. Kostrov B. V., 1974, Seismic moment and energy of earthquakes, and seismic flow of rock, Earth Physics, 1, 23
  63. 10.1002/2014GC005407 · DOI
  64. 10.1029/2017JB015257 · DOI
  65. 10.1029/1999JB900356 · DOI
  66. Kreemer C. Holt W. E. &Haines A. J.(2002).The global moment rate distribution within plate boundary zones. InS.Stein&J. T.Freymueller(Eds.) Plate boundary zones(pp.173–190).Washington DC:American Geophysical Union. · DOI
  67. 10.1016/j.epsl.2019.01.046 · DOI
  68. 10.1029/2000GL012611 · DOI
  69. 10.4095/210902 · DOI
  70. Lamothe P., 2010, A crustal deformation study of the Charlevoix seismic zone in Quebec, Geomatica, 64, 61
  71. 10.1016/j.epsl.2005.06.032 · DOI
  72. 10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.03.015 · DOI
  73. 10.1139/e02-046 · DOI
  74. 10.1029/2018JB015620 · DOI
  75. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2004.02465.x · DOI
  76. 10.1016/j.epsl.2006.09.038 · DOI
  77. 10.1029/2003GL017586 · DOI
  78. 10.1029/2004JB003590 · DOI · Paper page
  79. 10.1029/2011GL049846 · DOI
  80. 10.1130/l65.1 · DOI · Paper page
  81. 10.1029/2012JB009473 · DOI
  82. 10.1016/j.tecto.2018.01.011 · DOI
  83. 10.1093/gji/ggx446 · DOI
  84. 10.1785/0120100223 · DOI
  85. 10.5078/corssa-00180805 · DOI
  86. 10.1038/35059054 · DOI
  87. 10.1785/0220170063 · DOI
  88. 10.1016/j.pepi.2018.09.005 · DOI
  89. 10.1785/0220150059 · DOI
  90. 10.1093/gji/ggx524 · DOI
  91. 10.1785/0120040166 · DOI
  92. 10.1029/2001GL013782 · DOI
  93. 10.1126/science.265.5169.195 · DOI
  94. 10.1002/jqs.713 · DOI
  95. 10.1002/2014JB011176 · DOI
  96. 10.1002/2016JB013844 · DOI
  97. 10.3133/ofr20161035 · DOI
  98. 10.1002/2017JB014930 · DOI
  99. Reid H. F., 1910, The California earthquake of April 18, 1906. Volume II. The mechanics of the earthquake
  100. Riddihough R. P.&Hyndman R. D.(1991).Modern plate tectonic regime of the continental margin of Western Canada. InH.Gabrielse&C. J.Yorath(Eds.) Geology of the Cordilleran Orogen in Canada. Geology Survey Canada Geology of Canada No. 4 (also Geological Society American The Geology of North America V. G2). · DOI
  101. 10.1016/j.pepi.2012.07.005 · DOI
  102. Ristau J. P., 2004, Seismotectonics of western Canada from regional moment tensor analysis
  103. 10.1785/0120050028 · DOI
  104. 10.1785/0120130287 · DOI
  105. 10.1016/j.jog.2010.04.008 · DOI
  106. 10.1093/gji/ggx156 · DOI
  107. 10.1785/BSSA0870051345 · DOI
  108. 10.1029/2006GL027081 · DOI · Paper page
  109. 10.1080/01621459.1968.10480934 · DOI
  110. 10.1785/0120140247 · DOI
  111. 10.1093/gji/ggw103 · DOI
  112. 10.1002/2016JB012884 · DOI
  113. 10.1016/j.epsl.2013.11.058 · DOI
  114. Stern V. H., 2013, Alberta earthquake catalogue, version 1.0: September 2006 through December 2010, Alberta Geological Survey Open File Report, 2013
  115. 10.1029/2018JB017050 · DOI
  116. 10.1029/2017JB015417 · DOI · Paper page
  117. Theil H., 1950, A rank‐invariant method of linear and polynomial regression analysis, Indagationes Mathematicae, 12, 85
  118. 10.1007/s00024-011-0420-1 · DOI
  119. 10.1029/90JB01583 · DOI
  120. 10.1139/e09-044 · DOI
  121. 10.4095/306292 · DOI
  122. 10.1029/94GL02840 · DOI
  123. 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2006.03147.x · DOI
  124. 10.1029/2001JB001227 · DOI
  125. 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00556.x · DOI
  126. 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.t01-2-00658.x · DOI
  127. 10.1785/BSSA0700041337 · DOI
  128. 10.1130/1052-5173(2004)014<4:WATECW>2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  129. 10.1002/2013eo450001 · DOI
  130. 10.1785/0119990114 · DOI
  131. 10.1029/2018JB016352 · DOI
  132. 10.1029/2019JB018248 · DOI
  133. 10.1002/2017GL075967 · DOI
  134. 10.1029/96JB03860 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ojo, A. O., Kao, H., Jiang, Y., Craymer, M., & Henton, J.
Affiliations
  • Geological Survey of Canada, Natural Resources Canada Sidney BC Canada
  • Canadian Geodetic Survey Surveyor General Branch Natural Resources Canada Sidney BC Canada
Venue
Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth
Published
2021-04
Volume
126
Issue
4
ISSN
  • 2169-9313
  • 2169-9356
Cited by
17
References
0
Language
en
Funders
Natural Resources Canada

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review