Cited by 95Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesMental Health Research TopicsIdentity, Memory, and Therapy

Depressive Rumination: Nature, Theory and Treatment

·2003·Wiley eBooks

Abstract

Rumination (recyclic negative thinking), is now recognised as important in the development, maintenance and relapse of recurrence of depression. For instance, rumination has been found to elevate, perpetuate and exacerbate depressed mood, predict future episodes of depression, and delay recovery during cognitive therapy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470713853

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Wiley eBooks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
OpenAlex
W4241298804
Cited by
95
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
FWCI
0.61
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
Keywords
rumination, depression, depressive rumination, negative thinking, relapse, depression maintenance, cognitive therapy, depressive mood

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review