Cited by 134Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsMental Health Research Topics

Relationships between rumination, worry, intolerance of uncertainty and metacognitive beliefs

de Jong-Meyer, Renate, Beck, Beate, Riede, Katharina·2009·Personality and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.paid.2008.12.010

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
de Jong-Meyer, R., Beck, B., & Riede, K.
Affiliations
University of Münster (DE)
Venue
Personality and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-03
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
547-551
ISSN
0191-8869 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2015626180
Cited by
134
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 4
FWCI
7.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Personality and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Mental Health Research Topics
Keywords
rumination, worry, intolerance of uncertainty, metacognitive beliefs, repetitive negative thinking, depression, anxiety, community sample, transdiagnostic approach, psychopathology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review