Cited by 401EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningLanguage Development and DisordersSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

Maturational Constraints in SLA

Hyltenstam, Kenneth, Abrahamsson, Niclas·2003·The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Introduction Maturational Constraints as the Default Hypothesis The Empirical Evidence Theoretical Foundations Toward an Understanding of the Role of Maturation Future Research: Basic Methodological Requirements A Final Remark

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9780470756492.ch17

Cites

89 of 90 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 22

  1. Bialystok E., 1999, Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, 161
  2. Birdsong D., 1999, Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, 1, 10.4324/9781410601667 · DOI
  3. Bongaerts T., 1999, Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, 133
  4. Carroll J. B., 1959, Modern Language Aptitude Test. Form A
  5. Curtiss S., 1988, Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey. Vol. II, 99
  6. Curtiss S., 1989, The case of Chelsea: a new test case of the critical period for language acquisition
  7. Ekberg L., 1998, Nordiske sprog som andetsprog, 99
  8. Eubank L., 1999, Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, 65
  9. Flege J. E., 1999, Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, 101
  10. Harley B., 1997, Tutorials in Bilingualism: Psycholinguistic Perspectives
  11. Hene B., 1993, Utlandsadopterade barns och svenska barns ordförståelse: en jämförelse mellan barn i åldern 10–12 år
  12. Ioup G., 1989, Variation in Second Language Acquisition. Vol. 2: Psycholinguistic Issues, 160
  13. Lee D., 1992, Universal Grammar, learnability, and the acquisition of English reflexive binding by L1 Korean speakers
  14. Long M. H., 1993, Progression and Regression in Language, 196
  15. Moody M., 1996, Recent Advances in Otitis Media: Proceedings of the 6th International Symposium, 339
  16. Neufeld G., 1977, Language learning ability in adults: A study on the acquisition of prosodic and articulatory features, Working Papers on Bilingualism, University of Ontario, 12, 45
  17. Obler L. K., 1989, Variation in Second Language Acquisition. Vol. II: Psycholinguistic Issues, 141
  18. Ottó I., 1996, Hungarian Language Aptitude Test. Words in Sentences
  19. Schlyter S., 1993, Progression and Regression in Language, 289
  20. Schneiderman E. I., 1988, The Exceptional Brain: Neuropsychology of Talent and Special Abilities, 103
  21. Weber‐Fox C. M., 1999, Second Language Acquisition and the Critical Period Hypothesis, 23
  22. Zhang Y., 1992, The ultimate attainment of Chinese as a second language: a case study. Term paper. Department of English as a Second Language

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N.
Venue
The Handbook of Second Language Acquisition
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-01
Pages
538-588
OpenAlex
W1559758698
Cited by
400
References
89
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 14 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 22 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 28
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Language Development and Disorders
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
maturational constraints, second language acquisition, developmental constraints, language acquisition theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review