CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 121Personality Traits and PsychologyAttachment and Relationship DynamicsPersonality Disorders and Psychopathology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 76 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Five‐Factor Model, Five‐Factor Theory, and Interpersonal Psychology

Costa, Paul T., McCrae, Robert R.·2010·Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology
DOI 10.1002/9781118001868.ch6
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The five-factor model (FFM) is a taxonomy of traits; five-factor theory (FFT) is a theory of personality based on research with the FFM. Both are useful in understanding interpersonal psychology. Traits traditionally considered interpersonal fall in the plane defined by FFM extraversion and agreeableness, but all five factors have interpersonal consequences. FFT offers an account of the operation of traits in interaction with the environment; in interpersonal interactions, people serve as reciprocal environments to each other. Adult attachment, like many other topics in interpersonal psychology, may be profitably viewed from the perspective of FFT.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118001868.ch6

Cites

76 of 76 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 77 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Costa P. T., 1992, Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO‐PI‐R) and NEO Five‐Factor Inventory (NEO‐FFI) professional manual
  2. Costa P. T., 1994, Personality stability and its contribution to successful aging, Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 27, 41
  3. Horowitz L. M., 2000, Inventory of Interpersonal Problems manual
  4. McCrae R. R., 2008, Handbook of personality: Theory and research, 159
  5. Wiggins J. S., 1996, The Five‐Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives
  6. Wiggins J. S., 1985, Perspectives in personality, 1
  7. Wiggins J. S., 1996, The Five‐Factor Model of personality: Theoretical perspectives, 88

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–121 of 121

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R.
Affiliations
National Institutes of Health (US)
ORCID
Venue
Handbook of Interpersonal Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2010-11-22
Pages
91-104
DOI
10.1002/9781118001868.ch6
OpenAlex
W1602351648
Semantic Scholar
a3dd9e5505e30b2f5919099d6fee20bfa575aa25
Cited by
121
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1 (tdm)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Keywords
Big Five personality traits, personality traits, interpersonal psychology, extraversion, agreeableness, trait-environment relationships, adult attachment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review