Cited by 892Animal Disease Management and EpidemiologyZoonotic diseases and public healthVeterinary Practice and Education Studies

Veterinary Epidemiology

Thrusfield, Michael, Christley, Robert, Brown, Helen, Diggle, Peter J., French, Nigel, Howe, Keith, Kelly, Louise, O'Connor, Annette +2 more·2018·Wiley eBooks

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781118280249

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Thrusfield, M., Christley, R., Brown, H., Diggle, P. J., French, N., Howe, K., Kelly, L., O'Connor, A., Sargeant, J., & Wood, H.
Affiliations
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
  • University of Liverpool (GB)
  • Roslin Institute (GB)
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • Massey University (NZ)
  • University of Exeter (GB)
  • University of Strathclyde (GB)
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • Ontario Veterinary College (CA)
Venue
Wiley eBooks
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-02-23
OpenAlex
W2896231580
Cited by
892
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 103 · 2025: 133 · 2024: 148 · 2023: 136 · 2022: 115 · 2021: 94 · 2020: 56 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
79.43
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Wiley eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Speech and Hearing › Veterinary Practice and Education Studies
Keywords
epizootiology, animal diseases, disease surveillance, risk factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review