Cited by 134Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestockGenetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and AnimalsGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

Reference genome of wild goat (Capra aegagrus) and sequencing of goat breeds provide insight into genic basis of goat domestication

Open access
Dong, Yang, Zhang, Xiaolei, Xie, Min, Arefnezhad, Babak, Wang, Zongji, Wang, Wenliang, Feng, Shaohong, Huang, Guodong +12 more·2015·BMC Genomics

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Domestic goats (Capra hircus) have been selected to play an essential role in agricultural production systems, since being domesticated from their wild progenitor, bezoar (Capra aegagrus). A detailed understanding of the genetic consequences imparted by the domestication process remains a key goal of evolutionary genomics. RESULTS: We constructed the reference genome of bezoar and sequenced representative breeds of domestic goats to search for genomic changes that likely have accompanied goat domestication and breed formation. Thirteen copy number variation genes associated with coat color were identified in domestic goats, among which ASIP gene duplication contributes to the generation of light coat-color phenotype in domestic goats. Analysis of rapidly evolving genes identified genic changes underlying behavior-related traits, immune response and production-related traits. CONCLUSION: Based on the comparison studies of copy number variation genes and rapidly evolving genes between wild and domestic goat, our findings and methodology shed light on the genetic mechanism of animal domestication and will facilitate future goat breeding.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12864-015-1606-1

Cites

77 of 77 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Signals of selection associated with serotonergic signaling have been identified in a tame strain of rat and the domesticated goat.

    “Signals of selection associated with serotonergic signaling have also been identified in a tame strain of rat and the domesticated goat (Albert et al., 2011;Dong et al., 2015).”

    From Glutamate receptors in domestication and modern human evolution (2020) · cites this paper as Dong et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [34]Nowak RM. Walker's Mammals of the World, 6th edn, vol. II: The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD. 1991:1135-1238.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dong, Y., Zhang, X., Xie, M., Arefnezhad, B., Wang, Z., Wang, W., Feng, S., Huang, G., Guan, R., Shen, W., Bunch, R., McCulloch, R., Li, Q., Li, B., Zhang, G., Xu, X., Kijas, J. W., Salekdeh, G. H., Wang, W., & Jiang, Y.
Affiliations
  • Kunming University of Science and Technology (CN)
  • Kunming Institute of Zoology (CN)
  • BGI Group (China) (CN)
  • Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute of Iran (IR)
  • Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (AU)
  • Royan Institute (IR)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Wenliang
  • Kijas, James W.
  • Salekdeh, Ghasem Hosseini
  • Wang, Wen
  • Jiang, Yu
Venue
BMC Genomics
Published
2015-06-05
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
431-431
ISSN
1471-2164 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1561398821
Cited by
116
References
77
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 5
FWCI
5.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • BMC Genomics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research at the University of Copenhagen (University of Copenhagen) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Government of Jiangxi Province
  • Environmental Protection Administration, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. Taiwan
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2013CB835200)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
goat domestication, Capra aegagrus, bezoar, goats, reference genome, copy number variation, coat color genes, rapidly evolving genes, immune response, production traits, goat breeds
MeSH terms
Amino Acid Sequence, Animals, Animals, Domestic, Animals, Wild, Breeding, DNA, Biological Evolution, Goats, Immune System, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Nervous System, Phylogeny, Genetic Variation, Sequence Alignment, Genome, Protein Structure, Tertiary, Receptor, Cholecystokinin A, DNA Copy Number Variations, Myelin and Lymphocyte-Associated Proteolipid Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review