Cited by 111Reliability and Agreement in MeasurementStatistical Methods and Bayesian InferenceStatistical Methods in Clinical Trials

The Concordance Correlation Coefficient for Repeated Measures Estimated by Variance Components

Carrasco, Josep L., King, Tonya S., Chinchilli, Vernon M.·2009·Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics

Abstract

The concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) is an index that is commonly used to assess the degree of agreement between observers on measuring a continuous characteristic. Here, a CCC for longitudinal repeated measurements is developed through the appropriate specification of the intraclass correlation coefficient from a variance components linear mixed model. A case example and the results of a simulation study are provided.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/10543400802527890

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • If available, test-retest data are extremely helpful, as they can help prioritize features on the basis of their reproducibility.

    “If available, test-retest data are also extremely helpful, as they can help prioritize features on the basis of their reproducibility (51,52).”

    From Radiomics: Images Are More than Pictures, They Are Data (2016) · cites this paper as [52]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Carrasco, J. L., King, T. S., & Chinchilli, V. M.
Affiliations
  • Universitat de Barcelona (ES)
  • Pennsylvania State University (US)
Corresponding author
Carrasco, Josep L.
Venue
Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
Published
2009-01-02
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
90-105
ISSN
  • 1054-3406 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-5711
OpenAlex
W2149541891
Cited by
111
References
13
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Reliability and Agreement in Measurement
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods and Bayesian Inference
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Keywords
concordance correlation coefficient, repeated measures, intraclass correlation coefficient, variance components, linear mixed models, interobserver agreement, longitudinal data, measurement agreement
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Analysis of Variance, Computer Simulation, Pharmaceutical Preparations, Humans, Hydrocortisone, Pharmacokinetics, Models, Statistical, Observer Variation, Confidence Intervals, Linear Models, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review