Higher-order theories of consciousness
Abstract
Higher-order theories purport to account for the conscious character of such states in terms of higher-order representations. This chapter focuses on three classes of higher-order theory of phenomenal consciousness, including inner-sense theory, actualist higher-order thought theory, and dispositionalist higher-order thought theory. All three of these higher-order theories purport to offer reductive explanations of phenomenal consciousness. Inner-sense theory has important positive virtues, but faces problems; whereas actualist higher-order thought theory avoids those problems, but at the cost of losing the positive virtues. Actualist higher-order thought theory has the advantage that no special organs or mechanisms need to be postulated. Dispositionalist higher-order thought theory claims to split the difference, providing an account that has all of the advantages of inner-sense theory with none of the flaws. The success of dispositionalist higher-order thought theory is premised upon the existence of dual analog contents.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories: New Foundations for Realism
Millikan, R. G. (1984) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4124.001.0001 · Cited by 4,758 · see citing works
Ten Problems of Consciousness: A Representational Theory of the Phenomenal Mind
Tye, M. (1995) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/6712.001.0001 · Cited by 1,718 · see citing works
Phenomenal Consciousness: A Naturalistic Theory
Carruthers, P. (2000) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511487491 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A higher-order theory of emotional consciousness
LeDoux, J. E., & Brown, R. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1619316114 · Cited by 690 · see citing works
Phenomenal Consciousness and Emergence: Eliminating the Explanatory Gap
Feinberg, T. E., & Mallatt, J. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01041 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
A beautiful loop: An active inference theory of consciousness.
Laukkonen, R., Friston, K., & Chandaria, S. (2025) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2025.106296 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Knowing Blue: Early Buddhist Accounts of Non-Conceptual Sense Perception
Sharf, R. (2017) · Philosophy East and West · doi:10.1353/pew.0.0126 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
- Authors
- Carruthers, P.
- Corresponding author
- Carruthers, Peter
- ORCID
- Carruthers, Peter
- Venue
- The Blackwell Companion to Consciousness
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2017-03-17
- Pages
- 288-297
- OpenAlex
- W4239668129
- Cited by
- 59
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 19 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
- Keywords
- higher-order theories of consciousness, phenomenal consciousness, higher-order representation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review