Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,603

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

How to Rate Management of Investment Funds

·2012·Treynor on Institutional Investing

Abstract

This chapter describes a simple graphical method for capturing the essence of what is permanent and distinctive about the performance of a fund, including the effects of fund management. It also introduces a concept of fund performance and a measure for rating fund-management performance. The characteristic line contains information about both expected rate of return and risk. The slope of the line measures volatility. Thus, a steep slope means that the actual rate of return for the fund in question is relatively sensitive to fluctuations in the general stock market. A gentle slope indicates that the fund in question is relatively insensitive to market fluctuations. A volatility of two means that a one-percent increases or decreases in the rate of return demonstrated by the Dow-Jones Average is accompanied, on the average, by a two-percent increase or decrease in the rate of return demonstrated by the particular fund in question. The characteristic line also contains information about management's ability to obtain a consistently higher return than the competitors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9781119196679.ch10

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 1,603

Metadata

Venue
Treynor on Institutional Investing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2012-01-02
Pages
69-87
OpenAlex
W149661105
Cited by
1,603
References
0
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How to Rate Management of Investment Funds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/9781119196679.ch10
The paper
How to Rate Management of Investment Funds. (2012). Treynor on Institutional Investing. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119196679.ch10

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.