The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds
Abstract
Mutual funds represent one of the fastest growing type of financial intermediary in the American economy. The question remains as to why mutual funds and in particular actively managed mutual funds have grown so fast, when their performance on average has been inferior to that of index funds. One possible explanation of why investors buy actively managed open end funds lies in the fact that they are bought and sold at net asset value, and thus management ability may not be priced. If management ability exists and it is not included in the price of open end funds, then performance should be predictable. If performance is predictable and at least some investors are aware of this, then cash flows into and out of funds should be predictable by the very same metrics that predict performance. Finally, if predictors exist and at least some investors act on these predictors in investing in mutual funds, the return on new cash flows should be better than the average return for all investors in these funds. This article presents empirical evidence on all of these issues and shows that investors in actively managed mutual funds may have been more rational than we have assumed.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Common risk factors in the returns on stocks and bonds
Fama, E. F., & French, K. R. (1993) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/0304-405x(93)90023-5 · Cited by 25,754
On Persistence in Mutual Fund Performance
Carhart, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb03808.x · Cited by 17,283
Sharpe, W. F. (1966) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/294846 · Cited by 3,937
Mutual Fund Performance: An Analysis of Quarterly Portfolio Holdings
Grinblatt, M., & Titman, S. (1989) · The Journal of Business · doi:10.1086/296468 · Cited by 1,349
Survivorship Bias in Performance Studies
Brown, S. J., Goetzmann, W., Ibbotson, R. G., & Ross, S. A. (1992) · Review of Financial Studies · doi:10.1093/rfs/5.4.553 · Cited by 1,121
Cited by
Measuring Mutual Fund Performance with Characteristic‐Based Benchmarks
DANIEL, K., GRINBLATT, M., TITMAN, S., & WERMERS, R. (1997) · The Journal of Finance · doi:10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb02724.x · Cited by 2,778
Mutual Fund Flows and Performance in Rational Markets
Berk, J. B., & Green, R. C. (2004) · Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1086/424739 · Cited by 2,083
Does Fund Size Erode Mutual Fund Performance? The Role of Liquidity and Organization
Chen, J., Hong, H., Huang, M., & Kubik, J. D. (2004) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/0002828043052277 · Cited by 1,430
Dumb money: Mutual fund flows and the cross-section of stock returns
Frazzini, A., & Lamont, O. A. (2008) · Journal of Financial Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jfineco.2007.07.001 · Cited by 882
The price of ethics and stakeholder governance: The performance of socially responsible mutual funds
Renneboog, L., Ter Horst, J., & Zhang, C. (2008) · Journal of Corporate Finance · doi:10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2008.03.009 · Cited by 835
Metadata
- Authors
- GRUBER, M. J.
- Venue
- The Journal of Finance
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1996-07
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 783-810
- ISSN
- 0022-1082 (ISSN-L)
- 1540-6261
- OpenAlex
- W2055337889
- Cited by
- 2,065
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 32.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb02707.x
- The paper
- GRUBER, M. J. (1996). Another Puzzle: The Growth in Actively Managed Mutual Funds. The Journal of Finance. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1996.tb02707.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.