Cited by 32Space Science and Extraterrestrial LifePlanetary Science and ExplorationSpace exploration and regulation

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Astrobiology Exploratory Missions and Planetary Protection Requirements

Horneck, Gerda, Debus, André, Mani, Peter, Spry, J. Andrew·2007·Complete Course in Astrobiology

Abstract

This chapter contains sections titled: Rationale and History of Planetary Protection Current Planetary Protection Guidelines Category I Missions Category II Missions Category III Missions Category IV Missions Category V Missions Future Development of Planetary Protection Guidelines Implementation of Planetary Protection Guidelines Bioload Measurements Bioburden Reduction Surface Wiping with Biocleaning Agents Gamma Radiation Sterilization Dry-heat Sterilization Hydrogen Peroxide Vapor/Gas Plasma Sterilization Prevention of Recontamination Astrobiology Exploratory Missions of Concern to Planetary Protection Missions to the Moon Missions to Mars Orbiters or Flyby Missions to Mars Landers or Rovers with in Situ Measurements Landers or Rovers with Martian Samples Returned to the Earth Human Missions to Mars Missions to Venus Missions to the Moons of the Giant Planets Missions to Asteroids or Comets Outlook: Future Tasks of Planetary Protection Further Reading Concerning COSPAR Planetary Protection Guidelines Concerning Handbooks and Standards on Planetary Protection Concerning Bioload of Spacecraft Concerning Lunar Missions Concerning Missions to Terrestrial Planets Concerning Missions to Jupiter's Moon Europa Questions for students

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/9783527618996.ch13

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These levels of contamination vary from less than 30 bacterial spores per lander to undetermined levels in the case of missions of category I.

    “These levels of contamination vary from less than 30 bacterial spores per lander to undetermined levels in the case of missions of category I (Horneck et al., 2007).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Horneck et al., 2007

  • Procedures to reduce the bioburden of a spacecraft include surface wiping with sterilizing agents, gamma radiation sterilization, dry heat sterilization, and hydrogen peroxide vapor/gas plasma sterilization.

    “The procedures to reduce the bioburden of a spacecraft include (i) surface wiping with sterilizing agents, (ii) gamma radiation sterilization, (iii) dry heat sterilization, (iv) hydrogen peroxide vapor/gas plasma sterilization (Horneck et al., 2007).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Horneck et al., 2007

  • Planetary protection measures are designed to prevent contamination whether this occurs intentionally or unintentionally.

    “Planetary protection measures are designed to prevent contamination whether this occurs intentionally or unintentionally (Horneck et al., 2007; NASA Office of Planetary Protection, 2010).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Horneck et al., 2007

  • Prevention of back contamination is achieved through strict quarantine procedures.

    “The prevention of back contamination is achieved through strict quarantine procedures (Rummel, 2000; Mancinelli, 2003; Debus, 2006; Horneck et al., 2007).”

    From The Astrobiology Primer v2.0 (2016) · cites this paper as Horneck et al., 2007

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. 10.1016/0273-1177(83)90167-9 · DOI
  2. 10.1016/0273-1177(95)00821-U · DOI
  3. Rummel J. D.Report of COSPAR/IAU Workshop on Planetary Protection Williamsburg VA USA 2–4 April2002. 2002 available athttp://www.cosparhq.org/scistr/ppp.htm.
  4. 10.1073/pnas.061021398 · DOI
  5. 10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00479-9 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Rummel J. D., 2004, Issues in planetary protection; history, policy and prospects, COSPAR Information Bulletin, 160, 31
  7. 10.1016/j.spacepol.2003.11.005 · DOI · Paper page
  8. CNES System Safety. Planetary Protection Requirements. Référenciel Normatif CNESRNC–CNES‐R‐14(Edition 4) December2002.
  9. 10.1016/j.resmic.2005.06.013 · DOI · Paper page
  10. NASA, 1980, NASA Standard Procedures for the Microbial Examination of Space Hardware
  11. NASA, 2005, Planetary Protection Provisions for Robotic Extraterrestrial Missions
  12. Debus A. Auburtin T. Darbord J. C. Hydrogen peroxide gas plasma sterilization process qualification for space application SAE publication ICES‐128 2000. · DOI
  13. 10.1046/j.1462-2920.2003.00496.x · DOI
  14. 10.1099/ijs.0.02747-0 · DOI
  15. Link L., 2003, Extreme spore UV resistance of Bacillus pumilus isolates obtained from an ultraclean spacecraft assembly facility, Microbial Ecology
  16. 10.1016/j.asr.2005.10.026 · DOI
  17. 10.1128/AEM.71.12.8147-8156.2005 · DOI
  18. 10.1128/MMBR.64.3.548-572.2000 · DOI
  19. Puleo J. R., 1977, Microbiological profiles of the Viking spacecraft, Appl. Environ. Microbiol., 33, 379, 10.1128/aem.33.2.379-384.1977 · DOI
  20. 10.1016/j.asr.2006.01.006 · DOI
  21. 10.1016/S0019-1035(03)00200-8 · DOI
  22. 10.1078/0723-2020-00018 · DOI
  23. 10.1099/ijs.0.02311-0 · DOI
  24. 10.1016/S0167-7012(02)00192-6 · DOI
  25. 10.1016/S0273-1177(98)00034-9 · DOI
  26. 10.1016/j.spacepol.2004.08.003 · DOI
  27. 10.1016/S0094-5765(01)00160-6 · DOI
  28. 10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00482-9 · DOI
  29. Debus A., 2003, Proceedings of the 37th ESLAB Symposium — Tools and Technologies for Future Planetary Exploration, 103
  30. 10.1016/S0273-1177(02)00662-2 · DOI
  31. Horneck G., 2003, HUMEX, a Study on the Survivability and Adaptation of Humans to Long‐Duration Exploratory Missions
  32. Kminek G., 2006, Planetary Protection — Human System Research and Technology
  33. Rummel J. D., 2002, A Draft Test Protocol for Detecting possible Biohazards in Martian Samples Returned to Earth
  34. Sims M. R., 2004, Beagle 2 Mission Report
  35. Space Studies Board of the U. S. National Research Council, 2006, Preventing the Forward Contamination of Mars
  36. Space Studies Board of the US National Research Council, 2002, Safe on Mars, Precursor Measurements Necessary to Support Human Operations on the Martian Surface
  37. 1990, Lessons Learned from the Viking Planetary Quarantine and Contamination Control Experience
  38. 2005, Planetary Protection and Contamination Control Technologies for Future Space Science Missions

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • The Astrobiology Primer v2.0

    Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Domagal-Goldman, S. D., Wright, K. E., Adamala, K., Arina de la Rubia, L., Bond, J., Dartnell, L. R., Goldman, A. D., Lynch, K., et al. (2016) · Astrobiology · doi:10.1089/ast.2015.1460 · Cited by 136

    “The prevention of back contamination is achieved through strict quarantine procedures (Rummel, 2000; Mancinelli, 2003; Debus, 2006; Horneck et al., 2007).”
    Influential

Metadata

Authors
Horneck, G., Debus, A., Mani, P., & Spry, J. A.
Venue
Complete Course in Astrobiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-02-23
Pages
353-397
OpenAlex
W1539520236
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 23 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2012: 3
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Space Science and Extraterrestrial Life
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Space and Planetary Science › Planetary Science and Exploration
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Space exploration and regulation
Keywords
planetary protection, astrobiology, bioburden reduction, spacecraft sterilization, gamma irradiation sterilization, dry heat sterilization, plasma sterilization, lunar missions, Mars missions, Mars sample return, Venus missions, Europa, recontamination prevention

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review