Cited by 44Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis ResearchDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchAlzheimer's disease research and treatments

Synaptic density in carriers of C9orf72 mutations: a [11C]UCB‐J PET study

Open access
Malpetti, Maura, Holland, Negin, Jones, P. Simon, Ye, Rong, Cope, Thomas E., Fryer, Tim D., Hong, Young T., Savulich, George +6 more·2021·Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology

Abstract

Synaptic loss is an early and clinically relevant feature of many neurodegenerative diseases. Here we assess three adults at risk of frontotemporal dementia from C9orf72 mutation, using [11 C]UCB‐J PET to quantify synaptic density in comparison with 19 healthy controls and one symptomatic patient with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. The three pre‐symptomatic C9orf72 carriers showed reduced synaptic density in the thalamus compared to controls, and there was an additional extensive synaptic loss in frontotemporal regions of the symptomatic patient. [11 C]UCB‐J PET may facilitate early, pre‐symptomatic assessment, monitoring of disease progression and evaluation of new preventive treatment strategies for frontotemporal dementia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acn3.51407

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Severe synaptic loss has been observed using 11C-UCBJ PET in series of cases with DLB, FTD, PD, PDD, PSP, CBD, and C9Orf72 mutation carriers.

    “while severe synaptic loss has been observed using 11C -UCBJ PET in series of cases with DLB, FTD, PD, PDD, PSP, CBD and C9Orf72 mutation carriers [205–209].”

    From The use of neuroimaging techniques in the early and differential diagnosis of dementia (2023) · cites this paper as [208]

    The Results report reduced thalamic [11C]UCB-J binding in each of three presymptomatic C9orf72 mutation carriers. They describe widespread severe synaptic loss in the symptomatic FTD patient, but do not characterize the loss in all three carriers as severe. This paper supports the C9orf72 portion of the grouped citation, with that severity qualification. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [1]Clare R King VG Wirenfeldt M Vinters HV Synapse loss in dementias [Internet] J Neurosci Res 2010 88 10 2083 2090 10.1002/jnr.22392 20533377 PMC3068914 · DOI · Paper page
  2. [6]Bang J Spina S Miller BL Frontotemporal dementia [Internet] Lancet 2015 386 10004 1672 1682 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00461-4 26595641 PMC5970949 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [18]Manavaki R Hong Y Fryer TD Brain MRI coil attenuation map processing for the GE SIGNA PET/MR: Impact on PET image quantification and uniformity IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Med Imaging Conf Proceedings 2019
  4. [25]Sha SJ Takada LT Rankin KP Frontotemporal dementia due To C9ORF72 mutations clinical and imaging features Neurology 2012 79 10 1002 1011 22875087 PMC3430713
  5. [29]Garibotto V Borroni B Agosti C Subcortical and deep cortical atrophy in Frontotemporal Lobar Degeneration [Internet] Neurobiol Aging 2011 32 5 875 884 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2009.05.004 19501427 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Malpetti, M., Holland, N., Jones, P. S., Ye, R., Cope, T. E., Fryer, T. D., Hong, Y. T., Savulich, G., Rittman, T., Passamonti, L., Mak, E., Aigbirhio, F. I., O’Brien, J. T., & Rowe, J. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • MRC Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit (GB)
  • Cambridge University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust Cambridge UK
Corresponding author
Malpetti, Maura
Venue
Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06-16
Volume
8
Issue
7
Pages
1515-1523
ISSN
2328-9503 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3166602195
Cited by
44
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 1
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Wellcome Trust (220258)
  • NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre (BRC‐1215‐20014)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Alzheimer's disease research and treatments
Keywords
C9orf72 mutation, frontotemporal dementia, synaptic density, behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia, neurodegeneration, early disease detection
MeSH terms
C9orf72 Protein, Carbon Radioisotopes, Female, Heterozygote, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Pyridines, Pyrrolidinones, Synapses, Positron-Emission Tomography, Frontotemporal Dementia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review