The Use and Benefits of External Memory Aids in Older and Younger Adults
Abstract
Summary: We examined the spontaneous use and benefits of external memory aids in older (aged 60–85 years) and younger (aged 17–31 years) adults. In Study 1, participants were or were not given the opportunity to use a memory aid in a phone message recall task. In Study 2, a memory aid was available for one of two similar tasks. Participants' spontaneous use of external memory aids was measured. On the Memory Compensation Questionnaire, older adults reported using external memory aids more frequently but were no more likely than younger adults to take notes on the messages. Older adults benefitted from the availability of notes in both studies; younger adults benefitted when the memory task was more challenging. The results illustrate the value of external memory aids and suggest that older adults may underutilize them. The findings also raise questions about the relation between self‐reported and actual use of strategies in everyday life. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These findings are in line with the results obtained when looking at the effects of note-taking as well as the subjective perceptions of users of smart journaling apps.
“Importantly, these findings are in line with the results obtained when looking at the effects of note-taking (Schryer & Ross, 2013) as well as the subjective perceptions of users of smart journaling apps (Hutmacher et al., 2023).”
From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Schryer & Ross, 2013
Cites
Baltes, P. B. (1997) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.52.4.366 · Cited by 2,066 · see citing works
Maylor, E. A. (1990) · The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A · doi:10.1080/14640749008401233 · Cited by 228 · see citing works
External and internal memory aids: When and how often do we use them?
Intons-Peterson, M. J., & Fournier, J. (1986) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: General · doi:10.1037/0096-3445.115.3.267 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Risko, E. F., & Gilbert, S. J. (2016) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2016.07.002 · Cited by 1,502 · see citing works
Finley, J. R., & Naaz, F. (2023) · Memory · doi:10.1080/09658211.2022.2126858 · Cited by 21 · see citing works
Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model
Hutmacher, F., Appel, M., & Schwan, S. (2024) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2024.2384125 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
- Authors
- Schryer, E., & Ross, M.
- Affiliations
- University of Waterloo (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Schryer, Emily
- Venue
- Applied Cognitive Psychology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2013-08-29
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 663-671
- ISSN
- 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-0720
- OpenAlex
- W1516765900
- Cited by
- 30
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 4.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Applied Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Keywords
- external memory aids, older adults, young adults, age differences, note-taking, memory compensation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review