Cited by 30Cognitive Functions and MemoryAging and Gerontology ResearchMemory Processes and Influences

The Use and Benefits of External Memory Aids in Older and Younger Adults

Schryer, Emily, Ross, Michael·2013·Applied Cognitive Psychology

Abstract

Summary: We examined the spontaneous use and benefits of external memory aids in older (aged 60–85 years) and younger (aged 17–31 years) adults. In Study 1, participants were or were not given the opportunity to use a memory aid in a phone message recall task. In Study 2, a memory aid was available for one of two similar tasks. Participants' spontaneous use of external memory aids was measured. On the Memory Compensation Questionnaire, older adults reported using external memory aids more frequently but were no more likely than younger adults to take notes on the messages. Older adults benefitted from the availability of notes in both studies; younger adults benefitted when the memory task was more challenging. The results illustrate the value of external memory aids and suggest that older adults may underutilize them. The findings also raise questions about the relation between self‐reported and actual use of strategies in everyday life. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acp.2946

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These findings are in line with the results obtained when looking at the effects of note-taking as well as the subjective perceptions of users of smart journaling apps.

    “Importantly, these findings are in line with the results obtained when looking at the effects of note-taking (Schryer & Ross, 2013) as well as the subjective perceptions of users of smart journaling apps (Hutmacher et al., 2023).”

    From Understanding Autobiographical Memory in the Digital Age: The AMEDIA-Model (2024) · cites this paper as Schryer & Ross, 2013

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schryer, E., & Ross, M.
Affiliations
University of Waterloo (CA)
Corresponding author
Schryer, Emily
Venue
Applied Cognitive Psychology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-08-29
Volume
27
Issue
5
Pages
663-671
ISSN
  • 0888-4080 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-0720
OpenAlex
W1516765900
Cited by
30
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3
FWCI
4.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Applied Cognitive Psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
Keywords
external memory aids, older adults, young adults, age differences, note-taking, memory compensation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review