Cited by 228Cognitive Functions and MemoryMemory Processes and InfluencesAging and Gerontology Research

Age and Prospective Memory

Maylor, Elizabeth A.·1990·The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A

Abstract

This paper reports an investigation into the effects of age, intelligence, and retrospective memory on performance in a prospective memory task in which subjects aged between 52 and 95 were required to telephone once a day either between two times or at an exact time. The most important influence on performance was how subjects chose to remember to make the telephone calls. The best performance was from subjects who telephoned either in conjunction with another routine event or engaged in some form of advanced planning of the daily schedule. The worst performance was from those who relied on internal cues from their own memory. Performance was intermediate from those who used external cues such as notes or diary entries. Subjects in the between condition were less likely to choose internal cues than those in the exact condition, possibly because the task appeared more difficult, and this resulted in their showing superior performance. The effect of age was influenced by the cue used. For subjects using internal cues, those who forgot were older than those who remembered, whereas for subjects using the other cues, those who forgot were younger than those who remembered. Regardless of cue, self-ratings of cognitive failures were related to performance such that those who reported more minor everyday mistakes were indeed more likely to forget to telephone. While there was some indirect effect of general intelligence on performance in the task, there was no relationship between r…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/14640749008401233

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Participants' adaptive use of an externalizing strategy suggests that metacognitive awareness of the likelihood of forgetting prompted compensatory offloading of intentions.

    “Participants' adaptive use of an externalizing strategy suggests that their metacognitive awareness of the likelihood of forgetting (i.e., more likely when there is a higher memory load, or a more distracting ongoing task) prompted compensatory offloading of intentions (see Maylor, 1990, for a related finding).”

    From Strategic offloading of delayed intentions into the external environment (2015) · cites this paper as Maylor, 1990

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Maylor, E. A.
Affiliations
Age and Cognitive Performance Research Centre, Manchester, U.K.
Corresponding author
Maylor, Elizabeth A.
Venue
The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A
Published
1990-08
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
471-493
ISSN
  • 0272-4987 (ISSN-L)
  • 1464-0740
OpenAlex
W1973930868
Cited by
228
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 9
FWCI
5.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
prospective memory, aging, age differences, general intelligence, retrospective memory, internal cues, external cues, cognitive failure
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Attention, Cues, Female, Humans, Intelligence, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Mental Recall, Retention, Psychology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review