Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 188

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Intentional Weight Loss in Overweight and Obese Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Is More Better?

Open access
Messier, Stephen P., Resnik, Allison E., Beavers, Daniel P., Mihalko, Shannon L., Miller, Gary D., Nicklas, Barbara J., deVita, Paul, Hunter, David J., Lyles, Mary F., Eckstein, Felix, Guermazi, Ali, Loeser, Richard F.·2018·Arthritis Care & Research

Abstract

Objective: To determine the dose response effect of weight loss on clinical and mechanistic outcomes in overweight and obese adults with knee osteoarthritis (OA). Methods: This is a secondary analysis of the diet‐induced weight loss only (D) and diet‐induced weight loss plus exercise (D + E) groups in the Intensive Diet and Exercise for Arthritis randomized controlled clinical trial. The 240 participants were overweight and obese older community‐dwelling adults with pain and radiographic knee OA. Participants were assigned to 1 of 4 groups according to weight loss achieved over an 18‐month period: <5% (<5% group), 5–10% (≥5% group), 10–20% (≥10% group), and >20% (≥20% group). Results: There were significant dose responses to weight loss for pain (P = 0.01), function (P = 0.0006), 6‐minute walk distance (P < 0.0001), physical (P = 0.0004) and mental (P = 0.03) health‐related quality of life (HRQ oL), knee joint compressive force (P < 0.0001), and interleukin‐6 (P = 0.002). Greater weight loss resulted in superior clinical and mechanstic outcomes, with the highest weight loss group (≥20% group) distinguishing itself on all measures compared with the <5% and ≥5% groups; the ≥20% group had 25% less pain and better function compared with the ≥10% group and significantly (P = 0.006) better physical HRQ oL. Conclusion: Long‐term weight loss of 10–19.9% of baseline body weight has substantial clinical and mechanistic benefits compared with less weight loss. The value of an additional 10% weight loss includes significantly improved physical HRQ oL and a clinically important reduction of pain and improvement in function.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/acr.23608

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 188

Metadata

Authors
Messier, S. P., Resnik, A. E., Beavers, D. P., Mihalko, S. L., Miller, G. D., Nicklas, B. J., deVita, P., Hunter, D. J., Lyles, M. F., Eckstein, F., Guermazi, A., & Loeser, R. F.
Venue
Arthritis Care & Research
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-10-26
Volume
70
Issue
11
Pages
1569-1575
ISSN
  • 0893-7524 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-464X
  • 2151-4658
OpenAlex
W2809330933
Cited by
188
References
6
FWCI
11.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Intentional Weight Loss in Overweight and Obese Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Is More Better? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/acr.23608
The paper
Messier, S. P., Resnik, A. E., Beavers, D. P., Mihalko, S. L., Miller, G. D., Nicklas, B. J., deVita, P., Hunter, D. J., Lyles, M. F., Eckstein, F., Guermazi, A., & Loeser, R. F. (2018). Intentional Weight Loss in Overweight and Obese Patients With Knee Osteoarthritis: Is More Better? Arthritis Care & Research. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.23608

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.