The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Synthesis and Rate Performance of Monolithic Macroporous Carbon Electrodes for Lithium‐Ion Secondary Batteries
Open accessAbstract
Three‐dimensionally ordered macroporous (3DOM) materials are composed of well‐interconnected pore and wall structures with wall thicknesses of a few tens of nanometers. These characteristics can be applied to enhance the rate performance of lithium‐ion secondary batteries. 3DOM monoliths of hard carbon have been synthesized via a resorcinol‐formaldehyde sol–gel process using poly(methyl methacrylate) colloidal‐crystal templates, and the rate performance of 3DOM carbon electrodes for lithium‐ion secondary batteries has been evaluated. The advantages of monolithic 3DOM carbon electrodes are: 1) solid‐state diffusion lengths for lithium ions of the order of a few tens of nanometers, 2) a large number of active sites for charge‐transfer reactions because of the material's high surface area, 3) reasonable electrical conductivity of 3DOM carbon due to a well‐interconnected wall structure, 4) high ionic conductivity of the electrolyte within the 3DOM carbon matrix, and 5) no need for a binder and/or a conducting agent. These factors lead to significantly improved rate performance compared to a similar but non‐templated carbon electrode and compared to an electrode prepared from spherical carbon with binder. To increase the energy density of 3DOM carbon, tin oxide nanoparticles have been coated on the surface of 3DOM carbon by thermal decomposition of tin sulfate, because the specific capacity of tin oxide is larger than that of carbon. The initial specific capacity of SnO 2‐coated 3DOM carbon increases compared to that of 3DOM carbon, resulting in a higher energy density of the modified 3DOM carbon. However, the specific capacity decreases as cycling proceeds, apparently because lithium–tin alloy nanoparticles were detached from the carbon support by volume changes during charge–discharge processes. The rate performance of SnO 2‐coated 3DOM carbon is improved compared to 3DOM carbon.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Templated nanocarbons for energy storage
Nishihara, H., & Kyotani, T. (2012) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201201715 · Cited by 745
Porous electrode materials for lithium-ion batteries–how to prepare them and what makes them special
Vu, A., Qian, Y., & Stein, A. (2012) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201200320 · Cited by 719
Self-citationAdvanced carbon aerogels for energy applications
Biener, J., Stadermann, M., Suss, M., Worsley, M. A., Biener, M. M., Rose, K. A., & Baumann, T. F. (2011) · Energy & Environmental Science · doi:10.1039/c0ee00627k · Cited by 651
Armstrong, E., & O'Dwyer, C. (2015) · Journal of Materials Chemistry C · doi:10.1039/c5tc01083g · Cited by 342
Carbon Aerogels and Monoliths: Control of Porosity and Nanoarchitecture via Sol–Gel routes
Antonietti, M., Fechler, N., & Fellinger, T.-P. (2014) · Chemistry of Materials · doi:10.1021/cm402239e · Cited by 227
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, K. T., Lytle, J. C., Ergang, N. S., Oh, S. M., & Stein, A.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-03-23
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 547-556
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2171236786
- Cited by
- 467
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synthesis and Rate Performance of Monolithic Macroporous Carbon Electrodes for Lithium‐Ion Secondary Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.200400186
- The paper
- Lee, K. T., Lytle, J. C., Ergang, N. S., Oh, S. M., & Stein, A. (2005). Synthesis and Rate Performance of Monolithic Macroporous Carbon Electrodes for Lithium‐Ion Secondary Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.200400186
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.