The DOI matches its Crossref record; 131 of the 131 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Progress on the Critical Parameters for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries to be Practically Viable
Open accessAbstract
Lithium–sulfur batteries have great potential to satisfy the increasing demand of energy storage systems for portable devices, electric vehicles, and grid storage because of their extremely high specific capacity, cost‐effectiveness, and environmental friendliness. In spite of all these merits, the practical utilization of lithium–sulfur batteries is impeded by commonly known challenges, such as low sulfur utilization (<80%), short life (<200 cycles), fast capacity fade, and severe self‐discharge effect, which mainly result from the i) low conductivity of the active material, ii) serious polysulfide shuttling, iii) large volume changes, and iv) lithium–metal anode contamination/corrosion. Numerous approaches are reported to effectively mitigate these issues. Indeed, such approaches have shown enhanced lithium–sulfur battery performances. However, many reports overlook the critical parameters, including sulfur loading (<13 mg cm−2), sulfur content (<70 wt%), and electrolyte/sulfur ratio (>11 µL mg−1), that significantly affect the analyzed electrochemical characteristics, energy density, and practicality of lithium–sulfur batteries. This review highlights the trends and progress in making cells fulfilling these fabrication parameters and discuss the challenges of the amount of sulfur and electrolyte in fabricating cells with practically necessary parameters and with high electrochemical utilization and efficiency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Li-O2 and Li-S batteries with high energy storage
Bruce, P. G., Freunberger, S. A., Hardwick, L. J., & Tarascon, J.-M. (2012) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat3191 · Cited by 9,479
Li-ion battery materials: present and future
Nitta, N., Wu, F., Lee, J. T., & Yushin, G. (2015) · Materials Today · doi:10.1016/j.mattod.2014.10.040 · Cited by 7,389
Lithium Batteries and Cathode Materials
Whittingham, M. S. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020731c · Cited by 6,267
Toward Safe Lithium Metal Anode in Rechargeable Batteries: A Review
Cheng, X.-B., Zhang, R., Zhao, C.-Z., & Zhang, Q. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00115 · Cited by 6,197
A highly ordered nanostructured carbon–sulphur cathode for lithium–sulphur batteries
Ji, X., Lee, K. T., & Nazar, L. F. (2009) · Nature Materials · doi:10.1038/nmat2460 · Cited by 5,988
Electrochemical Energy Storage for Green Grid
Yang, Z., Zhang, J., Kintner-Meyer, M. C. W., Lu, X., Choi, D., Lemmon, J. P., & Liu, J. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr100290v · Cited by 5,250
Lithium Batteries: Status, Prospects and Future
Scrosati, B., & Garche, J. (2010) · Journal of Power Sources · doi:10.1016/j.jpowsour.2009.11.048 · Cited by 5,153
Lithium metal anodes for rechargeable batteries
Xu, W., Wang, J., Ding, F., Chen, X., Nasybulin, E., Zhang, Y., & Zhang, J.-G. (2014) · Energy Environ. Sci. · doi:10.1039/c3ee40795k · Cited by 4,704
Rechargeable Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Manthiram, A., Fu, Y., Chung, S.-H., Zu, C., & Su, Y.-S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr500062v · Cited by 4,665
Self-citationRole of renewable energy sources in environmental protection: A review
Panwar, N. L., Kaushik, S. C., & Kothari, S. (2011) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2010.11.037 · Cited by 3,897
Cited by
Current Status and Future Prospects of Metal–Sulfur Batteries
Chung, S., & Manthiram, A. (2019) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.201901125 · Cited by 622
Self-citationA Review of Functional Binders in Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Yuan, H., Huang, J., Peng, H., Titirici, M., Xiang, R., Chen, R., Liu, Q., & Zhang, Q. (2018) · Advanced Energy Materials · doi:10.1002/aenm.201802107 · Cited by 438
Recent Advances in Hollow Porous Carbon Materials for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries
Fu, A., Wang, C., Pei, F., Cui, J., Fang, X., & Zheng, N. (2019) · Small · doi:10.1002/smll.201804786 · Cited by 417
Li-S Batteries: Challenges, Achievements and Opportunities
Raza, H., Bai, S., Cheng, J., Majumder, S., Zhu, H., Liu, Q., Zheng, G., Li, X., & Chen, G. (2023) · Electrochemical Energy Reviews · doi:10.1007/s41918-023-00188-4 · Cited by 406
Ng, S., Lau, M. Y. L., & Ong, W. (2021) · Advanced Materials · doi:10.1002/adma.202008654 · Cited by 404
Metadata
- Authors
- Chung, S., Chang, C., & Manthiram, A.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-05-29
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 28
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2807433987
- Cited by
- 477
- References
- 131
- FWCI
- 23.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Progress on the Critical Parameters for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries to be Practically Viable. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201801188
- The paper
- Chung, S., Chang, C., & Manthiram, A. (2018). Progress on the Critical Parameters for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries to be Practically Viable. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201801188
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
