The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
3D‐Printed Graphene Oxide Framework with Thermal Shock Synthesized Nanoparticles for Li‐CO2 Batteries
Abstract
Li‐CO 2 batteries have emerged as a promising energy storage technology due to their high theoretical energy density. A thick electrode design is an effective approach for further increasing the energy density on device level by decreasing the weight and volume ratios of inactive materials. Exploring and designing novel thick electrodes with high catalytic activity toward reversible reaction between lithium and carbon dioxide are key challenges to achieve a low charge overpotential, long cycling stability, and high rate performance. Herein, an ultrathick electrode (≈0.4 mm) design for Li‐CO 2 batteries by anchoring ultrafine Ni nanoparticles (≈5 nm) on a 3D‐printed reduced graphene oxide framework via thermal shock (1900 K for 54 ms) is demonstrated. The cathode displays low overpotential of 1.05 V at 100 mA g−1, high cycling stability of over 100 cycles, and good rate capability (up to 1000 mA g−1). In particular, a high areal capacity of 14.6 mA h cm−2 can be achieved due to the thick electrode design and uniform distribution of ultrafine catalyst nanoparticles. The strategy of combining an advanced 3D printing technique with fast thermal shock represents a promising direction toward thick electrode design in energy storage devices that are not limited to Li‐CO 2 batteries.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Zhu, C., Du, D., Eychmüller, A., & Lin, Y. (2015) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00255 · Cited by 672
Dynamics of Cellulose Nanocrystal Alignment during 3D Printing
Hausmann, M. K., Rühs, P. A., Siqueira, G., Läuger, J., Libanori, R., Zimmermann, T., & Studart, A. R. (2018) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.8b02366 · Cited by 282
Cited by
Additive Manufacturing of Batteries
Pang, Y., Cao, Y., Chu, Y., Liu, M., Snyder, K., MacKenzie, D., & Cao, C. (2020) · Advanced Functional Materials · doi:10.1002/adfm.201906244 · Cited by 298
Metadata
- Authors
- Qiao, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, C., Xie, H., Yao, Y., He, S., Ping, W., Liu, B., & Hu, L.
- Venue
- Advanced Functional Materials
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2018-10-26
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 51
- ISSN
- 1616-301X (ISSN-L)
- 1616-3028
- OpenAlex
- W2898601883
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: 3D‐Printed Graphene Oxide Framework with Thermal Shock Synthesized Nanoparticles for Li‐CO2 Batteries. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/adfm.201805899
- The paper
- Qiao, Y., Liu, Y., Chen, C., Xie, H., Yao, Y., He, S., Ping, W., Liu, B., & Hu, L. (2018). 3D‐Printed Graphene Oxide Framework with Thermal Shock Synthesized Nanoparticles for Li‐CO2 Batteries. Advanced Functional Materials. https://doi.org/10.1002/adfm.201805899
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.