Cited by 672Electrocatalysts for Energy ConversionNanoporous metals and alloysMesoporous Materials and Catalysis

Engineering Ordered and Nonordered Porous Noble Metal Nanostructures: Synthesis, Assembly, and Their Applications in Electrochemistry

Zhu, Chengzhou, Du, Dan, Eychmüller, Alexander, Lin, Yuehe·2015·Chemical Reviews

Abstract

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTEngineering Ordered and Nonordered Porous Noble Metal Nanostructures: Synthesis, Assembly, and Their Applications in ElectrochemistryChengzhou Zhu†, Dan Du†⊥, Alexander Eychmüller‡, and Yuehe Lin*†§View Author Information† School of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Pullman, Washington 99164-2920, United States⊥ Key Laboratory of Pesticide and Chemical Biology of the Ministry of Education, College of Chemistry, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, P. R. China‡ Physical Chemistry, TU Dresden, Bergstrasse 66b, 01062 Dresden, Germany§ Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, United States*E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 16, 8896–8943Publication Date (Web):July 16, 2015Publication History Received28 April 2015Published online16 July 2015Published inissue 26 August 2015https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00255https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00255review-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2015 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views20444Altmetric-Citations575LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref an…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.chemrev.5b00255

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhu, C., Du, D., Eychmüller, A., & Lin, Y.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • Central China Normal University (CN)
  • Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
  • Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Lin, Yuehe
Venue
Chemical Reviews
Published
2015-07-16
Volume
115
Issue
16
Pages
8896-8943
ISSN
  • 0009-2665 (ISSN-L)
  • 1520-6890
OpenAlex
W2243888953
Cited by
672
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 22 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 55 · 2021: 50 · 2020: 68 · 2019: 92 · 2018: 95 · 2017: 70 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 11
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Chemical Reviews (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Laboratory Directed Research and Development
  • Alexander von Humboldt-Stiftung
  • Washington State University
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Electrocatalysts for Energy Conversion
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Nanoporous metals and alloys
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Mesoporous Materials and Catalysis
Keywords
ordered nanostructures, nanostructure assembly, electrocatalysis, electrochemistry, metal nanoparticles, nanoparticle synthesis, nanoparticle self-assembly, electrocatalyst design, electrocatalyst stability, electrocatalyst selectivity, electrocatalyst cost reduction, electrocatalyst durability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review